Re: Test2 SPF
- From: "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
On Oct 11, 1:15 pm, "Cl\.Massé" <a...@xxxxx> wrote:
~~~~ clmasse on free F-country======================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT:
quantization (eg, energy of quantum oscillator) is quite different from
discretization (eg, wavelengths of classical standing waves)
They are the same thing. Quantization is the replacement of a classical
system by a wavefunction system. The consequence may be discretization, as
for the oscillator, that's why the meaning is close (quantum = discrete
quantity.)
Liberty, Equality, Profitability.
In old style tech lingo frequency "f" = "cycles / second",
expressed for the photon energy "/\E" as,
/\E = h*(cycles /second) .
When frequency is expressed as f = 1 / /\t , then, /\E = h / /\t,
and the resolution of the photon emission is " /\t" therefore,
Power "W" becomes
W = /\E / /\t = h / /\t^2 = /\E*f
which makes sense as "frequency" (= 1 / /\t), is the rate of energy
emitted or absorbed.
If we use a limit /\E / /\t => dE/dt , then that transforms away the
empirically proved quantization of Power and different math is
used for incremental calculus /\E / /\t than the differential
calculus
dE/dt, i.e. *the rules for manipulating logic are different*.
An example is Sigma summation compared to integration.
In the sample using Hi & Lois here,
http://physics.trak4.com/MST_UFT.pdf
let the gravitational red-shift be 0.9 as a photon is emitted at Lois
and absorbed at Hi's who is near oo, then sqrt(g_00) = 0.9 at Lois,
and g_00 = 0.81.
Using W=W_00 and g=g_00, the equation /\W = - /\g means
the photon loses power W = -0.19 and the g increments +0.19,
as a prediction and enables the covariant equation,
0 = /\W + /\g , Eq.(1),
in accord with Action, Energy, Power, QT of measurement and
General Relativity's gravitation contexted in Modern SpaceTime.
(We have some briefs on MST here,
http://physics.trak4.com/
we're working on, and they appear consistent, to date, also, with
the most up-to-date results of GP-b and LIGO, nulling).
Historically, emphasis is placed on the use of the Hamiltonian and
Lagrangian Equations, using energy and classical potentials.
What Eq.(1) provides is an alternative to those traditions by using
Power "W" and the GR potential "g" in a well defined quantized
setting.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker
kxsxt8
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Test2 SPF
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Test2 SPF
- References:
- Re: Test2 SPF
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Test2 SPF
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Test2 SPF
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Test2 SPF
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Test2 SPF
- Prev by Date: Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
- Next by Date: Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
- Previous by thread: Re: Test2 SPF
- Next by thread: Re: Test2 SPF
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|