The LHC needs two MIG-23. What kind of death do you prefer?

dlzc wrote:
Ivan Gorelik wrote:
funkenstein wrote:
3) an urgent appeal to shield the entire
solar system in a sphere of concrete to
avoid the constant stream of 1000TeV and
greater cosmic rays that collide with us

The neutron hole/drop made in collision of
cosmic rays and atmosphere particles has
velocity which is very close to the speed
of light.

Almost right. Once they interact, they most commonly interact many,
many times creating a shower of energetic "fragments" with
progressively slower velocities.

The neutron hole/drop made in collision of cosmic rays and atmosphere
particles will be overheated, and explode almost immediately.

The temperature of its surrounding will
be much more than many-many billions
Kelvin. As a result it will evaporate
immediately.

The temperature of the environs is inconsequential. However, if you
are interested in the facts, the background temperature being lower
allows for more rapid evaporation. LHC has a very low temperature, if
not as low as the CMBR.

CMBR is not an argument. Did you see how a meteorite enters into the
upper atmosphere? Why are they so bright? But before the melting, it
really had very low temperature.

But the neutron hole/drop made in
collision of protons in LHC can have
almost zero velocity. That corresponds
to a temperature, near to 0K.

... kinetic motion of a single entity has no effect on evaporation
rate. Such motion applies to "gasses" and temperature. Essentially
you speed the time rate of the object, allowing it to evaporate
faster, by not having it moving rapidly wrt the lab frame.

The microscopic neutron hole/drop will capture ordinary matter. It
will have microscopic accretion disk and microscopic jets. It will
live some time inside of magnet on the LHC. If it will be overheated
it will explode, if not – it will grow further. The LHC is the ideal
place, the best kinder garden, for the embryo of neutron star. Pump
the heat from their magnetic bed and it will grow faster.

Consequently, the neutron hole/drop
made on collider will not evaporate,

Incorrect. Already been done with more massive nucleii, and high
intensity. Evaporated.

Don’t lie. No one had already done it on the Earth. But soon we will
make it on the LHC.

By the way, neutrons have a short half-life... they will also
evaporate without massive gravity to drive their decay prodcuts back
together.

The computation shows that even two neutrons bonded into a neutron
hole have sufficient binding energy in order to prevent “evaporation”
though “15 minutes free-neutron-decay”. But the binding energy of
proton-neutron pair is greater and because of this the coupled neutron
pair will immediately undergo the beta decay, and will transform into
deuterium nuclei. The binding energy of two neutrons bonded into a
neutron droplet is smaller comparatively with that of neutron hole,
and is not known yet.

but will grow. The risk of global
catastrophe is very high. And CERN
becomes the global terrorist. Who
can stop CERN?

Winter.

Do not joke. It seems nobody does understand the threat from the
embryo of neutron star. It seems that it will be made soon. Then I
have several questions.
1) What form will have the ferromagnetic material, if it would be
liquid?
2) The growing embryo will radiate high energy particles. It will live
some time inside of some magnet, consuming it. Who will operate with
that radioactive magnet in order to put it on the space-rocket? What
if the embryo will drop out from that magnet at the time of the rocket
start?
3) After we will know that the embryo is already made, the people will
want to punish the creators of the collider. How to kill them? What
kind of death do you prefer?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Dark Matter....does it....matter that is?
    ... Say: 10,000,000,000 neutrinos ... > than or about the same as the density of a neutron star? ... The temperature of a black body distribution of freely ... propagating particles in the early universe scales as 1/a ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Proton-Proton Fusion- the easy way
    ... > <snip browser clash about neutron sources> ... It'd require a BEC made of something that has plenty ... AFAIK all other neutron sources are pretty much ... >> the temperature make thing more favorable still. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.science)
  • Re: Proton-Proton Fusion- the easy way
    ... It'd require a BEC made of something that has plenty of neutrons to give up, and a "seed source" of neutrons at the right energy to get the BEC to give its up all at once. ... Kinda handwavy, but might work. ... AFAIK all other neutron sources are pretty much incoherent, uncollimated, and nowhere near monoenergetic. ... Having the reaction take place in porous silicon apparently makes up for the problem, though, and increasing the temperature make thing more favorable still. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.science)