sci.physics.relativity

• Date Index

---

• Einstein : Science and Religion., socratus
• DonoShito why do you post on alt.crackpot?, Juan R.
  • Juan Alvarez Gonzalez, aka Juanshito the Stalker belongs to alt. crackpot :-), Dono
• Third Draft, Possible Closed Form Solution to Gaussian-Based Integrals with High-Order Field Interactions, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Third Draft, Possible Closed Form Solution to Gaussian-Based Integrals with High-Order Field Interactions, Dono
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Third Draft, Possible Closed Form Solution to Gaussian-Based Integrals with High-Order Field Interactions, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Third Draft, Possible Closed Form Solution to Gaussian-Based Integrals with High-Order Field Interactions, Dono
      • Message not available
      • Re: Third Draft, Possible Closed Form Solution to Gaussian-Based Integrals with High-Order Field Interactions, Dono
      • Re: Third Draft, Possible Closed Form Solution to Gaussian-Based Integrals with High-Order Field Interactions, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Third Draft, Possible Closed Form Solution to Gaussian-Based Integrals with High-Order Field Interactions, George Hammond
• Re: Test SPF3, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Test SPF3, Ken S. Tucker
• "The Paradox of Zeno", Vres
• Latest effort on the Gaussian-Type integral, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Latest effort on the Gaussian-Type integral, Dono
  • Re: Latest effort on the Gaussian-Type integral, eric gisse
    • Re: Latest effort on the Gaussian-Type integral, George Hammond
  • Re: Latest effort on the Gaussian-Type integral, eric gisse
    • Re: Latest effort on the Gaussian-Type integral, Albertito
      • Re: Latest effort on the Gaussian-Type integral, Albertito
      • Re: Latest effort on the Gaussian-Type integral, eric gisse
• The real secret of the speed of light, Albertito
  • Re: The real secret of the speed of light, Tom Roberts
    • Re: The real secret of the speed of light, Spirit of Truth
    • Re: The real secret of the speed of light, Albertito
      • Re: The real secret of the speed of light, Tom Roberts
      • Re: The real secret of the speed of light, Albertito
      • Re: The real secret of the speed of light, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: The real secret of the speed of light, Albertito
      • Re: The real secret of the speed of light, Tom Roberts
      • Re: The real secret of the speed of light, Albertito
      • Re: The real secret of the speed of light, Tom Roberts
      • Re: The real secret of the speed of light, Albertito
      • Re: The real secret of the speed of light, Dono
      • Message not available
      • Re: The real secret of the speed of light, Tom Roberts
  • Message not available
    • Re: The real secret of the speed of light, Androcles
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness", Vres
• coordinates and equations., rbwinn
  • Re: coordinates and equations., papa_rios
    • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: coordinates and equations., papa_rios
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., eric gisse
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., papa_rios
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
  • Re: coordinates and equations., PD
    • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., PD
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., PD
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., PD
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
  • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
    • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
    • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
      • Re: coordinates and equations., YBM
      • Re: coordinates and equations., rbwinn
• Strange result, Dono
  • Re: Strange result, Juan R.
    • Re: Strange result, Dono
      • Re: Strange result, Juan R.
  • Re: Strange result, Albertito
    • Re: Strange result, Dono
  • Re: Strange result, mluttgens
    • Re: Strange result, Androcles
    • Re: Strange result, Dono
      • Re: Strange result, mluttgens
      • Re: Strange result, Dono
  • Re: Strange result, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: Strange result, Dono
      • Re: Strange result, Albertito
      • Re: Strange result, Dono
      • Re: Strange result, Juan R.
      • Re: Strange result, Dono
      • Re: Strange result, Juan R.
      • Message not available
      • Re: Strange result, Juan R.
      • Re: Strange result, Dono
      • Re: Strange result, Juan R.
    • Re: Strange result, Dono
    • Re: Strange result, Androcles
      • Re: Strange result, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Strange result, Androcles
  • Re: Strange result, RP
    • Re: Strange result, Dono
• Possible Closed Form Solution to Gaussian-Based Integrals with High-Order Field Interactions?, Jay R. Yablon
• Juanshito Alvarez Gonzalez, still stuck at alt.crackpot, the appropriate forum for him, Dono
  • Re: new insults from banned troll Dono, Juan R.
  • Re: Juanshito Alvarez Gonzalez, still stuck at alt.crackpot, the appropriate forum for him, Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) Revisited Part Two, bsr3997
• "Creation of Universe and the Gravity Transformations", Vres
• Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Dono
    • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, eric gisse
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Juan R.
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Dono
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Juan R.
      • Juanshito Alvarez Gonzalez keeps posting in the proper thread : alt.crackpot, Dono
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Juan R.
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Dono
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Juan R.
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Dono
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Juan R.
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Dono
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Dono
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Juan R.
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Dono
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Juan R.
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Dono
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Juan R.
      • Message not available
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Juan R.
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Dono
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Juan R.
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Dono
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Juan R.
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Dono
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Juan R.
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Dono
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Juan R.
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Dono
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Juan R.
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Juan R.
  • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, Albertito
  • Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Jay R. Yablon
    • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Dono
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Dono
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Albertito
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Dono
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Juan R.
    • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Dono
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Juan R.
    • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Albertito
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Dono
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Albertito
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Dono
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Juan R.
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Albertito
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Dono
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Juan R.
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Dono
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Dono
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Dono
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Juan R.
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Dono
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Juan R.
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, George Hammond
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, eric gisse
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Dono
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, eric gisse
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Dono
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Juan R.
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, eric gisse
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Juan R.
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Dono
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Juan R.
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Dono
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Juan R.
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, eric gisse
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Dono
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Juan R.
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, eric gisse
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Juan R.
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, John Park
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution, Juan R.
  • Message not available
    • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, John Park
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, John Park
      • Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral, John Park
• Re: Strength of gravity inside the Earth, eric gisse
• CREDIT CARD MENU, SAMANTHA
• Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?, Albertito
  • Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?, Dono
    • Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?, Albertito
      • Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?, Dono
      • Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?, Juan R.
      • Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?, Dono
      • Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?, Juan R.
  • Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?, Albertito
      • Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?, Dono
  • Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?, PD
  • Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?, xxein
    • Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?, rotchm
  • Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?, eric gisse
    • Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?, xxein
• QUATRON PARTICLES AND NEW PHYSICS, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• propagation of light, rbwinn
  • Re: propagation of light, eric gisse
    • Re: propagation of light, rbwinn
      • Re: propagation of light, eric gisse
      • Re: propagation of light, rbwinn
      • Re: propagation of light, eric gisse
      • Re: propagation of light, rbwinn
      • Re: propagation of light, eric gisse
      • Re: propagation of light, rbwinn
      • Re: propagation of light, eric gisse
      • Re: propagation of light, rbwinn
  • Re: propagation of light, YBM
    • Re: propagation of light, rbwinn
      • Re: propagation of light, YBM
      • Re: propagation of light, rbwinn
      • Re: propagation of light, YBM
      • Re: propagation of light, rbwinn
      • Re: propagation of light, YBM
  • Re: propagation of light, YBM
    • Re: propagation of light, rbwinn
    • Re: propagation of light, rbwinn
  • Re: propagation of light, xxein
    • Re: propagation of light, rbwinn
• Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
  • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dono
  • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Darwin123
    • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., doug
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., doug
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., doug
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dono
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., doug
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., doug
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., doug
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Darwin123
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Ace0f_5pades
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Darwin123
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., doug
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Darwin123
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Ace0f_5pades
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., PD
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Darwin123
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Darwin123
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., eRDe
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
    • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., eRDe
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., doug
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Darwin123
    • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., John Kennaugh
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., PD
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Darwin123
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Darwin123
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., John Kennaugh
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Darwin123
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., John Kennaugh
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Darwin123
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Darwin123
  • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., eric gisse
  • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Igor
    • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Igor
  • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Jürgen Clade
    • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., eric gisse
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., eric gisse
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., doug
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., PD
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., PD
  • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Juan R.
    • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Juan R.
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Juan R.
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Juan R.
  • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., doug
    • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., maxkeon
  • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., PD
    • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., PD
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., doug
      • Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First., PD
• Re: WHY EINSTEINIANS HAVE A JOB, shuba
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: WHY EINSTEINIANS HAVE A JOB, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: WHY EINSTEINIANS HAVE A JOB, Androcles
      • Re: WHY EINSTEINIANS HAVE A JOB, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: WHY EINSTEINIANS HAVE A JOB, Androcles
• Do you want to chat with troll Dono about relativity?, try this, Albertito
  • Re: Do you want to chat with troll Dono about relativity?, try this, Juan R.
    • Re: Do you want to chat with troll Dono about relativity?, try this, Albertito
      • Re: Do you want to chat with troll Dono about relativity?, try this, Juan R.
  • Re: Do you want to chat with troll Dono about relativity?, try this, eric gisse
    • Re: Do you want to chat with troll Dono about relativity?, try this, Albertito
      • Re: Do you want to chat with troll Dono about relativity?, try this, eric gisse
    • Re: Do you want to chat with troll Dono about relativity?, try this, Hayek
• Dirk, the Archetypical Tragic Figure, bjones
  • Re: Dirk, the Archetypical Tragic Figure, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Dirk, the Archetypical Tragic Figure, eric gisse
    • Re: Dirk, the Archetypical Tragic Figure, bjones
      • Re: Dirk, the Archetypical Tragic Figure, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: Dirk, the Archetypical Tragic Figure, PD
• "H.E.Retic Postings and SPAM", Vres
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Vres
• جندي بريطاني ... يتحول الى امرأة بعد رجوعه من العراق !!! بالصور, رودين
• A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
  • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, kenseto
    • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, kenseto
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Dono
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, kenseto
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Dono
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, kenseto
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, xray4abc
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, harry
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, kenseto
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, harry
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, kenseto
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, kenseto
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Dono
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, kenseto
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, kenseto
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, kenseto
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, kenseto
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, harry
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, kenseto
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, kenseto
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, kenseto
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Message not available
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, kenseto
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, PD
  • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Alen
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Alen
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Alen
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Alen
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Uncle Ben
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Bryan Olson
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, PD
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, Alen
      • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben, PD
• Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, blackhead
  • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Albertito
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Dono
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Darwin123
    • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Strich.9
  • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Sue...
  • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, OG
  • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, RP
    • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, eric gisse
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, RP
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Dono
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, OG
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, eric gisse
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Strich.9
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Dono
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Strich.9
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, RustyJames
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Dono
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Strich.9
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Dono
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Strich.9
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Dono
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Strich.9
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Dono
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Strich.9
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Dono
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Strich.9
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, eric gisse
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Dono
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Strich.9
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Dono
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Strich.9
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Dono
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Strich.9
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Strich.9
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, RustyJames
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Dono
    • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Tom Roberts
      • According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE], Strich.9
      • Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE], Dono
      • Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE], harry
      • Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE], Androcles
      • Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE], harry
      • Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE], Strich.9
      • Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE], Androcles
      • Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE], harry
      • Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE], Androcles
      • Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE], Strich.9
      • Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE], harry
      • Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE], Strich.9
      • Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE], Strich.9
      • Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE], harry
      • Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE], Strich.9
      • Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE], harry
      • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, Sue...
  • Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring, harry
• Little traveler problem, Ioannis
  • Re: Little traveler problem, Sue...
  • Re: Little traveler problem, Uncle Ben
    • Re: Little traveler problem, Sue...
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Steve Morris
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Strich.9
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Steve Morris
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Androcles
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Steve Morris
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Androcles
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Steve Morris
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Androcles
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Steve Morris
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Sue...
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Steve Morris
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Sue...
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Steve Morris
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Sue...
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Steve Morris
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Little traveler problem, Albertito
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Strich.9
  • Re: Little traveler problem, Albertito
    • Re: Little traveler problem, andrewgeorges93
    • Re: Little traveler problem, eric gisse
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Albertito
      • Re: Little traveler problem, eric gisse
  • Re: Little traveler problem, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: Little traveler problem, Ioannis
      • Re: Little traveler problem, Albertito
  • Re: Little traveler problem, andrewgeorges93
    • Re: Little traveler problem, Androcles
  • Re: Little traveler problem, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Little traveler problem, Androcles
• Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
  • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., doug
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Strich.9
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., RustyJames
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Strich.9
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Strich.9
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Strich.9
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., doug
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
    • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Strich.9
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., doug
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Strich.9
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., doug
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
  • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., eric gisse
    • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., eric gisse
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., eric gisse
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., RustyJames
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., eric gisse
  • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., RustyJames
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
  • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., eRDe
    • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., eRDe
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., eRDe
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., eRDe
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., eRDe
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., eRDe
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., eRDe
      • Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space., Paul B. Andersen
• precession of mercury, dseppala
  • Re: precession of mercury, eric gisse
    • Re: precession of mercury, dseppala
      • Re: precession of mercury, eric gisse
      • Re: precession of mercury, dseppala
      • Re: precession of mercury, eric gisse
  • Re: precession of mercury, Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Dono
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Uncle Ben
    • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, kenseto
  • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, eric gisse
    • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Hayek
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, eric gisse
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Hayek
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, kenseto
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, kenseto
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, kenseto
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, kenseto
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, kenseto
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, papa_rios
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, kenseto
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, kenseto
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, kenseto
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, kenseto
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Dono
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Strich.9
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Dono
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Strich.9
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, sam
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Androcles
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, sam
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Androcles
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, sam
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Androcles
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Strich.9
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, xray4abc
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Androcles
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, kenseto
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Hayek
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, kenseto
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Hayek
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Hayek
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, eric gisse
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Hayek
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, eric gisse
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Hayek
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, eric gisse
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Hayek
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Hayek
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Strich.9
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, Hayek
      • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, kenseto
  • Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited, sam
• Re: The End Of American Capitalism, davidmabus
• Auto Insurance Center - Auto Insurance Quote, darpana . 1226
• About " The third Newton's law "., socratus
  • Re: About " The third Newton's law "., Tom Roberts
    • Re: About " The third Newton's law "., socratus
      • Re: About " The third Newton's law "., socratus
      • Re: About " The third Newton's law "., socratus
    • Re: About " The third Newton's law "., Stamenin
      • Re: About " The third Newton's law "., socratus
      • Re: About " The third Newton's law "., socratus
• Einstein and Eddington, SAT 22, 21:10 GMT BBC2, Hayek
• "Gravity", Osp
  • Re: "Gravity", Uncle Ben
• Re: New proof of e=mc2, Androcles
• How long will the relativist Brother-hood stand this ?, Hayek
  • Re: How long will the relativist Brother-hood stand this ?, eric gisse
    • Re: How long will the relativist Brother-hood stand this ?, Hayek
      • Re: How long will the relativist Brother-hood stand this ?, eric gisse
      • Re: How long will the relativist Brother-hood stand this ?, Hayek
    • Re: How long will the relativist Brother-hood stand this ?, Hayek
  • Re: How long will the relativist Brother-hood stand this ?, John Kennaugh
• New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
  • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
  • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Igor
    • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Igor
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Tom Roberts
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
    • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Tom Roberts
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Albertito
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Albertito
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Albertito
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Albertito
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Tom Roberts
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
  • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
    • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
  • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Albertito
    • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
    • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Albertito
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
  • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
    • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
  • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Strich.9
    • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Strich.9
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Strich.9
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
    • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, doug
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Strich.9
    • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Tom Roberts
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Strich.9
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Strich.9
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Tom Roberts
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Strich.9
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Strich.9
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Tom Roberts
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Androcles
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Tom Roberts
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Eric Gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, mluttgens
    • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
    • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Dono
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
  • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
    • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, eric gisse
      • Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity, Juan R.
      • Re: New lie by crackpot Eric Gisse, Juan R.
• News: e=mc2: 103 years later, Einstein's proven right, Robert Karl Stonjek
• Analytically Exact Calculation of Yang Mills Action -- Looking for Feedback on a Research Direction, Jay R. Yablon
• For Gisse, From Einstein., Hayek
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy", Osp
  • Re: New nonsense by automated bot, Juan R.
• The solution to all problems in quantum physics and cosmic observations, john
• What is the shape of the multiverse?, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• simultaneity of events, rbwinn
  • Re: simultaneity of events, eric gisse
    • Re: simultaneity of events, rbwinn
      • Re: simultaneity of events, eric gisse
      • Re: simultaneity of events, rbwinn
      • Re: simultaneity of events, eric gisse
  • Re: simultaneity of events, RP
    • Re: simultaneity of events, eric gisse
      • Re: simultaneity of events, RP
      • Re: simultaneity of events, eric gisse
    • Re: simultaneity of events, Dono
    • Re: simultaneity of events, rbwinn
  • Re: simultaneity of events, Uncle Ben
    • Re: simultaneity of events, rbwinn
      • Re: simultaneity of events, Uncle Ben
      • Re: simultaneity of events, rbwinn
• Gravations passing from the 10th dimension through to the 11th dimensional membrane., RustyJames
• Open access physics papers, ehudza
  • Re: Open access physics papers, Dono
• The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1, Uncle Ben
  • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1, rotchm
  • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1, PD
  • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1, wugi
    • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1, Uncle Ben
      • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1, wugi
      • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1, Uncle Ben
      • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1, Uncle Ben
      • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1, Spirit of Truth
  • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1, Alen
  • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1 - the key to Einstein's fallacy, Spirit of Truth
    • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1 - the key to Einstein's fallacy, Uncle Ben
      • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1 - the key to Einstein's fallacy, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1 - the key to Einstein's fallacy, doug
      • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1 - the key to Einstein's fallacy, Spirit of Truth
      • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1 - the key to Einstein's fallacy, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1 - the key to Einstein's fallacy, Uncle Ben
      • Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1 - the key to Einstein's fallacy, Dr. Henri Wilson
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?", Osp
• transforming coordinates, rbwinn
  • Re: transforming coordinates, PD
    • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, PD
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, PD
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, PD
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, PD
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, PD
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, PD
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, PD
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, Dono
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, Dono
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, Dono
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, Dono
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, Dono
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, PD
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, PD
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, PD
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
  • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
    • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
  • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
    • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, eric gisse
      • Re: transforming coordinates, Dono
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, Dono
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, Dono
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, glird
      • Re: transforming coordinates, Dono
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, Paul Cardinale
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, Paul Cardinale
      • Re: transforming coordinates, PD
      • Re: transforming coordinates, PD
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, Paul Cardinale
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, YBM
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
      • Re: transforming coordinates, Paul Cardinale
      • Re: transforming coordinates, Igor
      • Re: transforming coordinates, rbwinn
• PD does not understand SR, Part II, bjones
  • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, dlzc
    • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, bjones
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, PD
    • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, bjones
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, bjones
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, bjones
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, bjones
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, Sue...
  • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, John Kennaugh
  • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, bjones
  • Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II, rotchm
• Time, Hayek
• A weird but serious solution for the Schrödinger’s Cat paradox, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • A weird but serious solution for the Schrödinger’s Cat paradox, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: A weird but serious solution for the Schrödinger’s Cat paradox, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Psychological Awareness of Time, Simple Simon
• Re: Everyone lies about sex as it always happens. Why?, dlzc
  • Re: Everyone lies about sex as it always happens. Why?, Hayek
    • Re: Everyone lies about sex as it always happens. Why?, dlzc
• What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?, Ridwan
  • Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?, Androcles
      • Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?, dlzc
      • Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?, Androcles
    • Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?, Strich.9
      • Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?, dlzc
      • Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?, Androcles
      • Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?, RustyJames
• Re: You guys should look up St Augustine and Time, Don Stockbauer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: You guys should look up St Augustine and Time, carlip-nospam
    • Re: You guys should look up St Augustine and Time, Spirit of Truth
• R of S for Dummies, Uncle Ben
  • Re: R of S for Dummies, Spirit of Truth
    • Re: R of S for Dummies, Uncle Ben
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Jim Newman
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Spirit of Truth
    • Re: R of S for Dummies, Uncle Ben
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Spirit of Truth
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Uncle Ben
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Uncle Ben
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Spirit of Truth
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Spirit of Truth
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Uncle Ben
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Spirit of Truth
      • Re: R of S for Dummies - the key to Einstein's fallacy, Spirit of Truth
      • Re: R of S for Dummies - the key to Einstein's fallacy, Uncle Ben
      • Re: R of S for Dummies - the key to Einstein's fallacy, Spirit of Truth
      • Re: R of S for Dummies - the key to Einstein's fallacy, Uncle Ben
  • Re: R of S for Dummies, papa_rios
    • Re: R of S for Dummies, Uncle Ben
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, papa_rios
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Uncle Ben
  • Re: R of S for Dummies, shuba
    • Re: R of S for Dummies, Uncle Ben
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, shuba
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Uncle Ben
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, shuba
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Jerry
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, shuba
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Jerry
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, shuba
  • Re: R of S for Dummies, kenseto
    • Re: R of S for Dummies, Dono
    • Re: R of S for Dummies, Uncle Ben
  • Re: R of S for Dummies, Hayek
  • Re: R of S for Dummies, PD
    • Re: R of S for Dummies, kenseto
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, PD
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, kenseto
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, PD
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, kenseto
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, PD
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, kenseto
  • Re: R of S for Dummies, wugi
    • Re: R of S for Dummies, Uncle Ben
  • Re: R of S for Dummies, kenseto
    • Re: R of S for Dummies, Uncle Ben
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: R of S for Dummies, Dono
    • Re: R of S for Dummies, kenseto
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Dono
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Dono
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Uncle Ben
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Dono
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, kenseto
      • Re: R of S for Dummies, Dono
• Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory, glird
    • Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory, xxein
    • Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory, xxein
      • Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory, glird
      • Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory, xxein
      • Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory, glird
      • Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory, xxein
      • Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory, Hayek
      • Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory, ESKI
      • Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory, xxein
      • Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory, xxein
• Physics and Geometry. / My opinion./, socratus
• Sitting at the center..., Hayek
  • Re: Sitting at the center..., Rudolf Drabek
    • Re: Sitting at the center..., Golden California Girls
    • Re: Sitting at the center..., Hayek
      • Re: Sitting at the center..., Rudolf Drabek
      • Re: Sitting at the center..., Hayek
      • Re: Sitting at the center..., corgorant
• Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Hayek
  • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Juan R.
    • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Hayek
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Albertito
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Hayek
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Juan R.
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Hayek
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Juan R.
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Hayek
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Juan R.
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Dono
      • Re: new insults by troll Dono, Juan R.
      • Shithead Juan R. Gonzalez Alvarez keeps on posting, Dono
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Hayek
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Juan R.
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Dono
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Hayek
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Juan R.
      • Re: new insult by banned nasty troll Dono, Juan R.
  • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., eric gisse
    • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Hayek
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., eric gisse
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Hayek
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., eric gisse
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., Hayek
      • Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel., eric gisse
      • Re: new lies and insults by Eric Gisse, Juan R.
      • Re: new lies and insults by Eric Gisse, eric gisse
      • Re: new lies and strawman by Eric Gisse, Juan R.
• Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Dr. Henri Wilson
  • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., eric gisse
  • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Tom Roberts
    • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Strich.9
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Androcles
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Strich.9
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Androcles
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Hayek
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., RP
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Tom Roberts
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., RP
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Paul B. Andersen
      • !, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: !, eric gisse
      • Re: !, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: !, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., RP
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., RP
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., RP
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., RP
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., RP
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., RP
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., RP
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Dono
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., RP
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Dono
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., RP
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Dono
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., RP
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., RP
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Dono
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Igor
    • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Androcles
  • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Dono
    • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., snapdragon31
      • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Androcles
  • Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist., Paul B. Andersen
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Wod
  • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Juan R.
    • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", xxein
      • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Juan R.
  • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", SolomonW
    • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Juan R.
      • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", SolomonW
      • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Juan R.
      • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", xxein
      • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Juan R.
      • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", xxein
      • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Juan R.
      • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", xxein
      • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Juan R.
      • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", xxein
      • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", xxein
      • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Juan R.
      • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", xxein
      • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Juan R.
• Optical Computing: special issue - Natural Computing, Springer, optical supercomputing
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Optical Computing: special issue - Natural Computing, Springer, optical supercomputing
  • Optical Computing: special issue - Natural Computing, Springer, optical supercomputing
  • Optical Computing: special issue - Natural Computing, Springer, optical supercomputing
• DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN, Stamenin
  • Re: DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN, Hayek
    • Re: DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN, Androcles
      • Re: DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN, Hayek
      • Re: DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN, Androcles
      • Re: DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN, John Kennaugh
      • Re: DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN, Androcles
      • Re: DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN, Hayek
      • Re: DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN, Hayek
• Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones, Albertito
  • Re: Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones, Hayek
    • Re: Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones, Albertito
      • Re: Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones, Hayek
  • Re: Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones, eric gisse
  • Re: Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones, PD
    • Re: Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones, PD
  • Re: Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones, RP
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", Wod
• Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing, Albertito
  • Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing, Albertito
    • Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing, dlzc
    • Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing, Albertito
  • Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing, Dono
    • Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing, Albertito
      • Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing, Juan R.
      • Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing, Dono
  • Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing, Juan R.
    • Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing, Albertito
      • Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing, Juan R.
  • Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing, eric gisse
    • Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing, Albertito
      • Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing, eric gisse
  • Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing, PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
  • Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
• New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues, Juan R.
  • Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues, Hayek
    • Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues, Juan R.
    • Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues, Juan R.
    • Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues, eric gisse
      • Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues, Hayek
      • Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues, eric gisse
      • Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues, Hayek
      • HIV Theory and TRUTH, Strich.9
      • Re: HIV Theory and TRUTH, Hayek
      • Re: HIV Theory and TRUTH, Strich.9
      • Re: HIV Theory and TRUTH, Hayek
    • Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues, Hayek
  • Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues, eric gisse
    • Re: New lies and strawman by crackpot Eric Gisse, Juan R.
    • Re: New lies and strawman by crackpot Eric Gisse, Juan R.
    • Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues, Hayek
    • Re: New lies and insults by crackpot Eric Gisse, Juan R.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues, Dono
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Wod
  • Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Jürgen Clade
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Vres
• cheap wholesale joran shoes and air force one, nikesoso1@xxxxxxxxx
• the more energy you use to acellerate the heaver the mass and density becomes., RustyJames
  • Re: the more energy you use to acellerate the heaver the mass and density becomes., Paul Cardinale
  • Re: the more energy you use to acellerate the heaver the mass and density becomes., pmb
• A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, John Kennaugh
  • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, eric gisse
    • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Hayek
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, eric gisse
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Hayek
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, eric gisse
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Hayek
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, eric gisse
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Hayek
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, strich . 9991
    • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, PD
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Strich.9
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, PD
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Strich.9
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, PD
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, PD
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Strich.9
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, eric gisse
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Hayek
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, John Kennaugh
    • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, maxwell
  • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Hayek
    • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Dono
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Hayek
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Dono
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, strich . 9991
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Dono
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Strich.9
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, PD
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Strich.9
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Hayek
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, strich . 9991
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Dono
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, strich . 9991
    • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, strich . 9991
  • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, rbwinn
  • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, holog
    • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, holog
  • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, harry
    • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Androcles
    • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, strich . 9991
    • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, harry
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, harry
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, maxwell
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, harry
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Androcles
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, glird
      • Gerald Lebau loosing it, Dono
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Hayek
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Dono
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Hayek
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Dono
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, harry
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Androcles
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, harry
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, harry
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Tim BandTech.com
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, glird
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Dono
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, harry
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, harry
      • the science of spin, Tim BandTech.com
      • Re: the science of spin, eric gisse
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Dono
  • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, GSS
    • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Dono
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, GSS
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Dono
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, GSS
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Dono
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, GSS
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Dono
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Dono
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, glird
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Dono
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Androcles
  • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Strich.9
    • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, PD
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Strich.9
  • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, xray4abc
    • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, xray4abc
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Tim BandTech.com
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Tim BandTech.com
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Tim BandTech.com
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, xray4abc
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Androcles
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2, Tim BandTech.com
• by reducing the over all resistance in to less tha 377 ohms, RustyJames
  • Re: by reducing the over all resistance in to less tha 377 ohms, Paul Cardinale
  • Re: by reducing the over all resistance in to less tha 377 ohms, Sue...
    • Re: by reducing the over all resistance in to less tha 377 ohms, RustyJames
      • Re: by reducing the over all resistance in to less tha 377 ohms, RustyJames
      • Re: by reducing the over all resistance in to less tha 377 ohms, Sue...
      • Re: by reducing the over all resistance in to less tha 377 ohms, RustyJames
      • Re: by reducing the over all resistance in to less tha 377 ohms, RustyJames
• YBM's problem, rbwinn
  • Re: YBM's problem, YBM
    • Re: YBM's problem, rbwinn
      • Re: YBM's problem, YBM
      • Re: YBM's problem, rbwinn
      • Re: YBM's problem, YBM
      • Re: YBM's problem, rbwinn
      • Re: YBM's problem, YBM
      • Re: YBM's problem, rbwinn
      • Re: YBM's problem, YBM
      • Re: YBM's problem, rbwinn
  • Re: YBM's problem, Igor
    • Re: YBM's problem, rbwinn
      • Re: YBM's problem, Igor
      • Re: YBM's problem, rbwinn
• May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
  • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Androcles
    • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Androcles
    • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
    • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Androcles
  • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., harry
    • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., harry
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., harry
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Androcles
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Androcles
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Strich.9
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Androcles
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., harry
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Androcles
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., harry
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., harry
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., harry
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., harry
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Androcles
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Androcles
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Androcles
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., harry
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Androcles
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., harry
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., harry
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., harry
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., harry
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Uncle Ben
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., harry
  • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
    • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
  • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Spirit of Truth
  • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., eric gisse
    • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., eric gisse
  • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Uncle Ben
    • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
    • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
  • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Tom Roberts
  • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., dlzc
    • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Androcles
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Androcles
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., dlzc
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Androcles
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RustyJames
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Androcles
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., dlzc
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Androcles
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
    • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Strich.9
  • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Sue...
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
    • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., Dono
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
      • Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory., RP
• A Simplified explanation for scientists, rbwinn
  • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, Dono
    • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, rbwinn
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, Dono
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, rbwinn
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, doug
  • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, eric gisse
    • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, rbwinn
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, eric gisse
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, RustyJames
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, doug
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, rbwinn
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, doug
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, rbwinn
    • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, doug
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, rbwinn
  • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, YBM
    • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, rbwinn
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, YBM
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, rbwinn
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, YBM
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, YBM
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, eric gisse
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, YBM
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, rbwinn
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, YBM
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, rbwinn
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, YBM
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, rbwinn
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, YBM
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, rbwinn
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, YBM
      • Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists, rbwinn
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Wod
  • Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", RustyJames
• Re: Counterintuitivity, shuba
  • Re: Counterintuitivity, Alen
    • Re: Counterintuitivity, shuba
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Counterintuitivity, bjones
  • Re: Counterintuitivity, shuba
    • Re: Counterintuitivity, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Counterintuitivity, kenseto
      • Re: Counterintuitivity, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Counterintuitivity, Uncle Ben
• ABOU THE VICIOUS CIRCLES IN PHYSICS, Stamenin
• Relativity expert...! this is for you, Nimo
• The Universe is at least 156 Billions light years wide ..., Noah's Dove
  • Re: The Universe is at least 156 Billions light years wide ..., funkenstein
    • Re: The Universe is at least 156 Billions light years wide ..., SolomonW
    • Re: The Universe is at least 156 Billions light years wide ..., Edward Green
• Re: Obama declares change in the speed of light, Don Stockbauer
  • Re: Obama declares change in the speed of light, Don Stockbauer
• "modern physics", holog
  • Re: "modern physics", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: "modern physics", Hayek
    • Re: "modern physics", Androcles
  • Re: "modern physics", Hayek
  • Re: "modern physics", harry
    • Re: "modern physics", Androcles
    • Re: "modern physics", maxwell
      • Re: "modern physics", harry
      • Re: "modern physics", Juan R.
      • Re: "modern physics", harry
      • Re: "modern physics", Juan R.
      • Re: "modern physics", harry
      • Re: "modern physics", Juan R.
      • Re: "modern physics", harry
      • Re: "modern physics", Juan R.
      • Re: "modern physics", Androcles
      • Re: "modern physics", Juan R.
      • Re: "modern physics", Juan R.
  • Re: "modern physics", John Kennaugh
• Sensation in Physics: Nimtz doeble prism experiment proven by the complex index theory of light., Josef Matz
• Occam’s razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Occam’s razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Occam’s razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Occam’s razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Occam’s razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Occam’s razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Occamʼs razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether., Juan R.
• "Corrections to Special Relativity", Kin
  • Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity", mick
    • Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity", Androcles
    • Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity", RP
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "Corrections to Special Relativity", Vres
• Some fringe stuff to add to the Experimental Basis of Relativity, Dono
  • Re: Some fringe stuff to add to the Experimental Basis of Relativity, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Some fringe stuff to add to the Experimental Basis of Relativity, Dono
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
  • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Dr. Henri Wilson
    • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, papa_rios
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, papa_rios
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, eric gisse
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, strich . 9991
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, strich . 9991
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, strich . 9991
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Strich.9
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, strich . 9991
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, strich . 9991
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Strich.9
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Strich.9
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Strich.9
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Strich.9
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, strich . 9991
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, strich . 9991
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., Strich.9
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., doug
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., Strich.9
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., Strich.9
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., doug
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., strich . 9991
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., PD
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., Strich.9
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., John Park
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., Androcles
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., PD
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., strich . 9991
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., PD
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., strich . 9991
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., papa_rios
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., strich . 9991
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., eric gisse
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., strich . 9991
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., doug
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., strich . 9991
      • PD can lie, but he still cannot find time dilation, strich . 9991
      • Re: PD can lie, but he still cannot find time dilation, PD
      • Re: PD can lie, but he still cannot find time dilation, strich . 9991
      • Re: PD can lie, but he still cannot find time dilation, RustyJames
      • Re: PD can lie, but he still cannot find time dilation, PD
      • Re: PD can lie, but he still cannot find time dilation, strich . 9991
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., eric gisse
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., Strich.9
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., strich . 9991
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., strich . 9991
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., YBM
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., strich . 9991
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., YBM
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., strich . 9991
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., YBM
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., strich . 9991
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., YBM
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., strich . 9991
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., YBM
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., strich . 9991
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., PD
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., Strich.9
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., Strich.9
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., doug
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., Strich.9
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., Strich.9
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., PD
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., strich . 9991
      • Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time..., PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Paul B. Andersen
      • In English: Where is Time Dilation?, strich . 9991
      • Re: In English: Where is Time Dilation?, doug
      • Re: In English: Where is Time Dilation?, strich . 9991
      • Re: In English: Where is Time Dilation?, doug
      • Re: In English: Where is Time Dilation?, Strich.9
      • Re: In English: Where is Time Dilation?, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, PD
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Dono
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
  • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
    • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, YBM
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, doug
      • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, rbwinn
• Image uploaded...! from your observation whats the conclusion., Nimo
  • Re: Image uploaded...! from your observation whats the conclusion., Nimo
  • Re: Image uploaded...! from your observation whats the conclusion., Nimo
    • Re: Image uploaded...! from your observation whats the conclusion., Nimo
      • Re: Image uploaded...! from your observation whats the conclusion., Nimo
• Re: Test2 SPF, Ken S. Tucker
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Test2 SPF, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Test2 SPF, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Test2 SPF, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Test2 SPF, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Test2 SPF, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Test2 SPF, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Test2 SPF, Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, strich . 9991
    • Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, strich . 9991
      • Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, doug
      • Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, strich . 9991
      • Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, doug
      • Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, Strich.9
  • Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, Juan R.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, strich . 9991
  • Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, Sue...
  • Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, Sue...
  • Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, Sue...
• Re: Physics Aptitude Test for the EPG., Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: Physics Aptitude Test for the EPG., Dr. Henri Wilson
    • Re: Physics Aptitude Test for the EPG., Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Physics Aptitude Test for the EPG., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Physics Aptitude Test for the EPG., Paul B. Andersen
• Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
    • Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: confused with time dilation, strich . 9991
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: confused with time dilation, RustyJames
  • Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: confused with time dilation, strich . 9991
    • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, strich . 9991
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, strich . 9991
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Sue...
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, strich . 9991
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: confused with time dilation, strich . 9991
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: confused with time dilation, strich . 9993
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: confused with time dilation, strich . 9993
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Androcles
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, strich . 9991
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: confused with time dilation, strich . 9991
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, strich . 9991
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Time Dilation disappears, strich . 9991
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, doug
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, strich . 9991
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, doug
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, strich . 9991
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, RustyJames
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, strich . 9991
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, RustyJames
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, RustyJames
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, RustyJames
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, RustyJames
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, strich . 9991
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, strich . 9991
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, eric gisse
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, strich . 9991
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, strich . 9991
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, doug
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, doug
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, doug
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, zarmewa
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Hayek
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, doug
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, doug
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, doug
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, doug
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, doug
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, doug
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, doug
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, eric gisse
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, eric gisse
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, doug
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, eric gisse
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, zarmewa
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, zarmewa
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, zarmewa
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, eric gisse
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, zarmewa
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, zarmewa
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, zarmewa
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, zarmewa
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, zarmewa
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, zarmewa
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, zarmewa
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, RustyJames
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Hayek
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Hayek
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Hayek
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Hayek
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Hayek
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, eric gisse
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, doug
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, eric gisse
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, eric gisse
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jerry
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jerry
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, eric gisse
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, doug
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, strich . 9991
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Hayek
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Hayek
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Hayek
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Hayek
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Hayek
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Hayek
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dono
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Hayek
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dono
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, strich . 9991
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, strich . 9991
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Androcles
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, YBM
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Strich.9
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, RustyJames
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, RustyJames
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, YBM
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, strich . 9991
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, PD
      • Re: Time Dilation disappears, strich . 9991
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: confused with time dilation, RustyJames
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Androcles
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, strich . 9991
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, strich . 9991
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Strich.9
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
      • Re: confused with time dilation, Hayek
      • Re: confused with time dilation, strich . 9991
      • Re: confused with time dilation, doug
  • Re: confused with time dilation, Uncle Ben
  • Re: confused with time dilation, rbwinn
  • Re: confused with time dilation, rbwinn
  • Re: confused with time dilation, rbwinn
    • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
  • Re: confused with time dilation, rbwinn
  • Re: confused with time dilation, rbwinn
    • Re: confused with time dilation, PD
  • Re: confused with time dilation, rbwinn
  • Re: confused with time dilation, rbwinn
• Isotropy in both space and time., lundslaktare
  • Re: Isotropy in both space and time., xxein
  • Re: Isotropy in both space and time., Tom Roberts
    • Re: Isotropy in both space and time., lundslaktare
      • Re: Isotropy in both space and time., Sue...
      • Re: Isotropy in both space and time., Eric Gisse
      • Re: Isotropy in both space and time., Tom Roberts
• Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), dseppala
  • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), dseppala
      • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), Androcles
  • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), harry
    • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), Androcles
  • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), rotchm
    • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), dseppala
      • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), rotchm
      • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), dseppala
      • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), rotchm
  • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), OG
    • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), dseppala
      • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), xxein
      • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), OG
      • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), dseppala
      • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), OG
      • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), dseppala
  • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), eric gisse
  • Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces), Paul Cardinale
• A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, John Kennaugh
  • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, Androcles
  • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, holog
  • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, eric gisse
    • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, Hayek
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, eric gisse
  • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, xxein
    • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, Hayek
    • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, harry
  • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, Tom Roberts
    • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, Hayek
    • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, PD
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, xxein
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, PD
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, xxein
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, Nimo
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, PD
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, xxein
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1, harry
• Nudism pre teens video ogg vorbis ohsaa unofficial football, friendes
• bonnes affaires solde bonnes affaires lesbians fucking gallery lindsay, friendes
• GLAMOUR GIRLS... U JUST CLICK..., babu
• Patek Philippe Calatrava 18kt Yellow Gold Diamond Ladies Watch 4906-101J Collection, hlbobo023
• Hand holding notes to GUT and TOE group theory via email, akalaniz
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), Dr. Henri Wilson
  • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), doug
      • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), doug
      • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), doug
      • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), Paul B. Andersen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), Uncle Ben
  • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), strich . 9991
    • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), doug
      • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), Strich.9
• Re: PD does not understand SR, bjones
  • Re: PD does not understand SR, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: PD does not understand SR, Hayek
    • Re: PD does not understand SR, bjones
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, bjones
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
  • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
  • Re: PD does not understand SR, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: PD does not understand SR, Dr. Henri Wilson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PD does not understand SR, Sue...
    • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Sue...
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Sue...
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Sue...
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Sue...
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Sue...
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Sue...
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Sue...
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Sue...
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Sue...
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Sue...
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Dr. Henri Wilson
    • Re: PD does not understand SR, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Sue...
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Sue...
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, doug
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, doug
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: PD does not understand SR, Sue...
    • Re: PD does not understand SR, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Sue...
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: PD does not understand SR, Dr. Henri Wilson
  • Re: PD does not understand SR, kenseto
  • Re: PD does not understand SR, bjones
• Re: $10,000 reward!, Dono
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: $10,000 reward!, Androcles
  • Re: $10,000 reward!, dwhig265
    • Re: $10,000 reward!, Androcles
    • Re: $10,000 reward!, Dono
  • Re: $10,000 reward!, John Polasek
    • Re: $10,000 reward!, dwhig265
      • Re: $10,000 reward!, Androcles
      • Re: $10,000 reward!, John Polasek
      • Re: $10,000 reward!, dwhig265
      • Re: $10,000 reward!, Dono
      • Re: $10,000 reward!, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: $10,000 reward!, dwhig265
• Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc, funkenstein
• about space - time, ashu
  • Re: about space - time, dlzc
    • Re: about space - time, holog
      • Re: about space - time, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: about space - time, PD
    • Re: about space - time, Sue...
  • Re: about space - time, Sue...
• 21 hand holding pages of QFT (summing: think Feynman) and group theory made easy--will email file, akalaniz
• There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Hayek
  • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Androcles
    • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Hayek
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Dono
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Hayek
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Androcles
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., strich . 9993
    • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., strich . 9993
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Androcles
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., PD
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., strich . 9993
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., PD
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., strich . 9991
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., PD
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., strich . 9991
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., PD
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., strich . 9991
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., PD
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., strich . 9991
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., PD
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Strich.9
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., PD
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Hayek
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., PD
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Hayek
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., PD
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Androcles
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Jürgen Clade
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Androcles
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Hayek
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Androcles
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Jürgen Clade
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Hayek
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Jürgen Clade
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., strich . 9991
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Jürgen Clade
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., strich . 9991
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., harry
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Sue...
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., harry
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Androcles
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Strich.9
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Sue...
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Sue...
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Sue...
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Sue...
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Sue...
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Sue...
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Sue...
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., PD
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Sue...
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., PD
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Sue...
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., PD
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., strich . 9991
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., PD
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., doug
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Strich.9
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., YBM
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Strich.9
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Strich.9
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., YBM
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Strich.9
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., YBM
      • A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., Strich.9
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., YBM
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., strich . 9991
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., doug
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., Strich.9
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., PD
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., Strich.9
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., doug
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., strich . 9991
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., YBM
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., strich . 9991
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., doug
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., strich . 9991
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., PD
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., strich . 9991
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., doug
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., strich . 9991
      • Relativists cannot find the time dilating clock anymore, strich . 9991
      • Re: Relativists cannot find the time dilating clock anymore, doug
      • Re: Relativists cannot find the time dilating clock anymore, strich . 9991
      • Re: Relativists cannot find the time dilating clock anymore, doug
      • Re: Relativists cannot find the time dilating clock anymore, strich . 9991
      • Re: Relativists cannot find the time dilating clock anymore, doug
      • Relativists claim to have answered a question but have no answer, Strich.9
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., doug
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., PD
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., YBM
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., strich . 9991
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., RustyJames
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., strich . 9991
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., rbwinn
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., strich . 9991
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., strich . 9991
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., doug
      • There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists - LIARS, Strich.9
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists - LIARS, doug
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists - LIARS, Strich.9
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists - LIARS, doug
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists - LIARS, Strich.9
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists - LIARS, doug
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists - LIARS, Strich.9
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists - LIARS, Strich.9
      • Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., doug
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., papa_rios
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., strich . 9991
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., strich . 9991
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Sue...
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Sue...
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Sue...
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., Androcles
  • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists., eric gisse
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy, Dr. Henri Wilson
  • Re: Physical meaning of entropy, Hayek
    • Re: Physical meaning of entropy, Dr. Henri Wilson
  • Re: Physical meaning of entropy, Juan R.
    • Re: Physical meaning of entropy, Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: The Missing Symbol., glird
  • Re: The Missing Symbol., eric gisse
• Contradictions?, RP
  • Re: Contradictions?, Androcles
  • Re: Contradictions?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
    • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
  • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
  • Re: Contradictions?, Sue...
    • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Sue...
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Sue...
  • Re: Contradictions?, harry
    • Re: Contradictions?, Androcles
    • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Androcles
      • Re: Contradictions?, strich . 9991
      • Re: Contradictions?, harry
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, harry
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, harry
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, harry
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Androcles
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, Androcles
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, harry
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Androcles
      • Re: Contradictions?, harry
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Hayek
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, harry
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, Sue...
      • Re: Contradictions?, RustyJames
  • Re: Contradictions?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Contradictions?, RP
    • Re: Contradictions?, strich . 9993
      • Re: Contradictions?, Androcles
      • Re: Contradictions?, PD
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Contradictions?, strich . 9991
  • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
  • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
    • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
    • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
  • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
  • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
    • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
      • Re: Contradictions?, RP
      • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
  • Re: Contradictions?, Dono
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment, rwjefferson
  • Re: Michelson and Morley experiment, Dr. Henri Wilson
    • Re: Michelson and Morley experiment, YBM
      • Re: Michelson and Morley experiment, Dr. Henri Wilson
  • Re: Michelson and Morley experiment, Androcles
    • Re: Michelson and Morley experiment, Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Hayek
    • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), xxein
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), xxein
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), strich . 9991
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), eric gisse
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), strich . 9991
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Hayek
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Dono
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Hayek
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Dono
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Hayek
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Dono
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), eric gisse
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Hayek
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), eric gisse
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Hayek
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), strich . 9993
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Hayek
      • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Dirk Van de moortel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Androcles
    • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Dr. Henri Wilson
  • Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist), Spirit of Truth
• Re: "Communicating at Translight Velocities", zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• cheap jordan shoes, nikesoso1
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity", Kin
• The Alpha and Omega of Special Relativity & Co., Spirit of Truth
  • Re: The Alpha and Omega of Special Relativity & Co., Sue...
    • Re: The Alpha and Omega of Special Relativity & Co., Hayek
      • Re: The Alpha and Omega of Special Relativity & Co., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: The Alpha and Omega of Special Relativity & Co., Hayek
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spirit of Truth
  • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, PD
    • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, strich . 9993
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, PD
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, strich . 9993
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Androcles
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, strich . 9991
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, PD
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, doug
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spaceman
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, strich . 9991
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, PD
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, strich . 9991
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, PD
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Strich.9
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, PD
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, PD
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, strich . 9991
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, PD
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Strich.9
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, doug
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, strich . 9991
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, doug
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, strich . 9991
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, doug
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Strich.9
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, PD
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Strich.9
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, PD
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Strich.9
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, doug
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, strich . 9991
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, PD
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Strich.9
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, PD
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Strich.9
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, PD
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, doug
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, doug
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, strich . 9991
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, doug
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Strich.9
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, PD
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Strich.9
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, doug
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, strich . 9991
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, doug
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, strich . 9991
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, doug
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Strich.9
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, doug
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Strich.9
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, doug
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Strich.9
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, doug
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, strich . 9991
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, doug
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, strich . 9991
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, YBM
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, strich . 9991
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, doug
      • Message not available
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, PD
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, strich . 9991
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, doug
      • Doug can whine and bicker, but he cannot identify the time dilated clock, strich . 9991
      • Re: Doug can whine and bicker, but he cannot identify the time dilated clock, doug
      • Re: Doug can whine and bicker, but he cannot identify the time dilated clock, strich . 9991
      • Re: Doug can whine and bicker, but he cannot identify the time dilated clock, eric gisse
      • Re: Doug can whine and bicker, but he cannot identify the time dilated clock, Strich.9
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, PD
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, strich . 9991
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, PD
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, Strich.9
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, PD
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, Strich.9
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, PD
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, strich . 9991
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, PD
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, strich . 9991
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, PD
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, strich . 9991
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, PD
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, strich . 9991
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, PD
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, Strich.9
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, PD
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, Strich.9
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, PD
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, Strich.9
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, jem
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, jem
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, jem
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, jem
      • Message not available
      • Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?, doug
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, doug
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, PD
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, RustyJames
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Strich.9
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Androcles
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, strich . 9993
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Androcles
      • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, strich . 9991
    • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spirit of Truth
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
  • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
    • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
    • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
  • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
    • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Message not available
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Message not available
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
  • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
    • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
    • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Message not available
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, strich . 9991
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, doug
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, strich . 9991
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Message not available
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, glird
  • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
    • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
  • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, xxein
    • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Strich.9
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Strich.9
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Strich.9
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Strich.9
      • After 3 days, the relativists cannot apply their theory on a simple case, Strich.9
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, xxein
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, xxein
      • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
• Re: I have got an idea!, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Einstein reborn as Yedi., Hayek
  • Re: Einstein reborn as Yedi., Dono
    • Re: Einstein reborn as Yedi., Hayek
      • Re: Einstein reborn as Yedi., Dono
      • Re: Einstein reborn as Yedi., Hayek
      • Re: Einstein reborn as Yedi., Dono
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Hayek
  • Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, YBM
    • Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Hayek
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations, Igor
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations, Dono
    • Re: Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations, Hayek
      • Re: Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations, Dono
      • Re: Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations, Hayek
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
  • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Edward Green
  • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Edward Green
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
    • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Edward Green
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Edward Green
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, carlip-nospam
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, carlip-nospam
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, carlip-nospam
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
    • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Hayek
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Hayek
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, strich . 9991
    • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, carlip-nospam
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Edward Green
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Edward Green
  • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Igor
    • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Edward Green
    • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Sue...
  • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Juan R.
    • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Juan R.
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Juan R.
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Juan R.
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Juan R.
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
    • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Juan R.
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, strich . 9991
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Juan R.
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: new insults and nonsenses by crackpot Eric Gisse, Juan R.
      • Re: new insults and nonsenses by crackpot Eric Gisse, eric gisse
      • Re: new insults and nonsenses by crackpot Eric Gisse, strich . 9993
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, strich . 9991
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Juan R.
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Dono
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, strich . 9993
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Dono
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, strich . 9993
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Dono
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Strich.9
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Strich.9
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Juan R.
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Dono
      • Re: new lie by Dono, Juan R.
      • Moron Juashito Gonzalez is back, Dono
      • Re: Moron Juashito Gonzalez is back, Strich.9
      • Re: Moron Juashito Gonzalez is back, Dono
      • MORON Juanshito Gonzalez Alvarez thinks that GP-B is set to measure GR waves, Dono
      • Re: MORON Juanshito Gonzalez Alvarez thinks that GP-B is set to measure GR waves, Dono
      • Re: new lie and insults by nasty troll Dono, Juan R.
      • Re: new lie and insults by nasty troll Dono, Juan R.
      • Re: new lie and insults by nasty troll Dono, Juan R.
      • Moron Juan Alvarez Gonzalez, Dono
      • Message not available
      • Juanshito Alvarez Gonzalez posting in the appropraite thread : alt.crackpot, Dono
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, eric gisse
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Juan R.
  • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, strich . 9993
    • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, strich . 9991
• Re: Galilean transformation, YBM
  • Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Galilean transformation, YBM
    • Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
  • Re: Galilean transformation, eric gisse
    • Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation, eric gisse
      • Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation, eric gisse
      • Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean transformation, eric gisse
      • Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, PD
  • Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, Hayek
    • Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, PD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, Hayek
  • Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, John Kennaugh
    • Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, Androcles
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, Don Stockbauer
  • Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, Hayek
    • Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, Edward Green
      • Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, Don Stockbauer
      • Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, Hayek
      • Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, Hayek
      • Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, eric gisse
      • Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, Hayek
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, Jim Black
    • Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, Androcles