sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: PD
• Einstein : Science and Religion.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Third Draft, Possible Closed Form Solution to Gaussian-Based Integrals with High-Order Field Interactions
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Third Draft, Possible Closed Form Solution to Gaussian-Based Integrals with High-Order Field Interactions
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: Third Draft, Possible Closed Form Solution to Gaussian-Based Integrals with High-Order Field Interactions
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real secret of the speed of light
  • From: Dono
• Re: Third Draft, Possible Closed Form Solution to Gaussian-Based Integrals with High-Order Field Interactions
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: PD
• Re: Third Draft, Possible Closed Form Solution to Gaussian-Based Integrals with High-Order Field Interactions
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: The real secret of the speed of light
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The real secret of the speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Vres
• Re: The real secret of the speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Third Draft, Possible Closed Form Solution to Gaussian-Based Integrals with High-Order Field Interactions
  • From: Dono
• Juan Alvarez Gonzalez, aka Juanshito the Stalker belongs to alt. crackpot :-)
  • From: Dono
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Dono
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Dono
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The real secret of the speed of light
  • From: Albertito
• DonoShito why do you post on alt.crackpot?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: eRDe
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: eRDe
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: maxkeon
• Re: How long will the relativist Brother-hood stand this ?
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1 - the key to Einstein's fallacy
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Third Draft, Possible Closed Form Solution to Gaussian-Based Integrals with High-Order Field Interactions
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Dono
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Igor
• Re: The real secret of the speed of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: The real secret of the speed of light
  • From: Albertito
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: John Park
• Re: The real secret of the speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The real secret of the speed of light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Test SPF3
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The real secret of the speed of light
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1 - the key to Einstein's fallacy
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1 - the key to Einstein's fallacy
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: The real secret of the speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Test SPF3
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: John Park
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: eRDe
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: John Park
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Dono
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Dono
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Dono
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Dono
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: John Park
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Latest effort on the Gaussian-Type integral
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Dono
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Dono
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Strange result
  • From: mluttgens
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Vres
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jerry
• Re: R of S for Dummies - the key to Einstein's fallacy
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Latest effort on the Gaussian-Type integral
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: The real secret of the speed of light
  • From: Albertito
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Latest effort on the Gaussian-Type integral
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Latest effort on the Gaussian-Type integral
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Latest effort on the Gaussian-Type integral
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Latest effort on the Gaussian-Type integral
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: R of S for Dummies - the key to Einstein's fallacy
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1 - the key to Einstein's fallacy
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: The real secret of the speed of light
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Latest effort on the Gaussian-Type integral
  • From: Dono
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Latest effort on the Gaussian-Type integral
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Dono
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Dono
• Re: R of S for Dummies - the key to Einstein's fallacy
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: PD
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: PD
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real secret of the speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Dono
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: doug
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: doug
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1 - the key to Einstein's fallacy
  • From: doug
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: doug
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: RP
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1 - the key to Einstein's fallacy
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• The real secret of the speed of light
  • From: Albertito
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Dono
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Dono
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Dono
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Dono
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Dono
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: eRDe
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Dono
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Albertito
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: RP
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Dono
• Re: coordinates and equations.
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: RP
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Juan R.
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Vres
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Strange result
  • From: RP
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Dono
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Dono
• coordinates and equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1 - the key to Einstein's fallacy
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: YBM
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: doug
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: PD
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: PD
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: PD
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: PD
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Strange result
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Strange result
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1 - the key to Einstein's fallacy
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: R of S for Dummies - the key to Einstein's fallacy
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Dono
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Dono
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Strange result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Dono
• Possible Closed Form Solution to Gaussian-Based Integrals with High-Order Field Interactions?
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Here Is What I Believe is the Solution
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: doug
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: WHY EINSTEINIANS HAVE A JOB
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: doug
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: doug
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: WHY EINSTEINIANS HAVE A JOB
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: doug
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: doug
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: doug
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: doug
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: YBM
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Dono
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Dono
• Re: New lie by crackpot Eric Gisse
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Juanshito Alvarez Gonzalez, still stuck at alt.crackpot, the appropriate forum for him
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: RP
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Dono
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Dono
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: PD
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: new insults from banned troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Dono
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?
  • From: Dono
• Juanshito Alvarez Gonzalez, still stuck at alt.crackpot, the appropriate forum for him
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Dono
• Juanshito Alvarez Gonzalez posting in the appropraite thread : alt.crackpot
  • From: Dono
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Juanshito Alvarez Gonzalez keeps posting in the proper thread : alt.crackpot
  • From: Dono
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: RP
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) Revisited Part Two
  • From: bsr3997
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: WHY EINSTEINIANS HAVE A JOB
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Dono
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: harry
• "Creation of Universe and the Gravity Transformations"
  • From: Vres
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Albertito
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: doug
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: doug
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: kenseto
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: kenseto
• Re: WHY EINSTEINIANS HAVE A JOB
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Dirk, the Archetypical Tragic Figure
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Do you want to chat with troll Dono about relativity?, try this
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: eRDe
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: eRDe
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Steve Morris
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: YBM
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Dono
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Alen
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Alen
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Alen
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: rbwinn
• Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: doug
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: xxein
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Strength of gravity inside the Earth
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?
  • From: rotchm
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Dirk, the Archetypical Tragic Figure
  • From: PD
• Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: PD
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Steve Morris
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: YBM
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Dirk, the Archetypical Tragic Figure
  • From: bjones
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: doug
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: doug
• Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?
  • From: Dono
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?
  • From: Albertito
• CREDIT CARD MENU
  • From: SAMANTHA
• Re: Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?
  • From: Dono
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: kenseto
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: YBM
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: doug
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: doug
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Vres
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Do you want to chat with troll Dono about relativity?, try this
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: eRDe
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Alen
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• QUATRON PARTICLES AND NEW PHYSICS
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Do you want to chat with troll Dono about relativity?, try this
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Do you want to chat with troll Dono about relativity?, try this
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Do you want to chat with troll Dono about relativity?, try this
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: harry
• Re: Do you want to chat with troll Dono about relativity?, try this
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Do you want to chat with troll Dono about relativity?, try this
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Steve Morris
• Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE]
  • From: harry
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: About " The third Newton's law ".
  • From: socratus
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: doug
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Alen
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: doug
• Re: propagation of light
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Steve Morris
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Steve Morris
• propagation of light
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Igor
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Dono
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Steve Morris
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Steve Morris
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: eric gisse
• Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: WHY EINSTEINIANS HAVE A JOB
  • From: shuba
• Re: the science of spin
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dirk, the Archetypical Tragic Figure
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Do you want to chat with troll Dono about relativity?, try this
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Steve Morris
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: eRDe
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Dirk, the Archetypical Tragic Figure
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Strich.9
• the science of spin
  • From: Tim BandTech.com
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: sam
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Dirk, the Archetypical Tragic Figure
  • From: bjones
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE]
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE]
  • From: harry
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Dono
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: harry
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE]
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Dono
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Dono
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• "H.E.Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Vres
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: kenseto
• Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE]
  • From: harry
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE]
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: xxein
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: xxein
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Hayek
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE]
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE]
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE]
  • From: harry
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Hayek
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE]
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE]
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE]
  • From: harry
• Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE]
  • From: Androcles
• Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE]
  • From: harry
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Androcles
• Re: According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE]
  • From: Dono
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: About " The third Newton's law ".
  • From: socratus
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: RP
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: shuba
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory
  • From: xxein
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: xxein
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: Dono
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory
  • From: xxein
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: doug
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: bjones
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: OG
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Dono
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: eRDe
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Counterintuitivity
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: papa_rios
• According to SR, line segment [EF] <> line segment [FE]
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: kenseto
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory
  • From: ESKI
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: doug
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Vres
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: sam
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Dono
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Counterintuitivity
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Counterintuitivity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: kenseto
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Counterintuitivity
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: harry
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: RP
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Jerry
• جندي بريطاني ... يتحول الى امرأة بعد رجوعه من العراق !!! بالصور
  • From: رودين
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: harry
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: harry
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Counterintuitivity
  • From: shuba
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: RP
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: RP
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: doug
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: doug
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Hayek
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Hayek
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Hayek
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory
  • From: xxein
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Igor
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Hayek
• Re: precession of mercury
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: precession of mercury
  • From: dseppala
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: precession of mercury
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: OG
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: sam
• Re: Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Lorentz contraction of spinning ring
  • From: blackhead
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Albertito
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Ioannis
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: precession of mercury
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: andrewgeorges93
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: andrewgeorges93
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: kenseto
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Hayek
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1
  • From: Alen
• Re: precession of mercury
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Albertito
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: kenseto
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Little traveler problem
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Little traveler problem
  • From: Ioannis
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: About " The third Newton's law ".
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: RP
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: sam
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: xxein
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: shuba
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: shuba
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Hayek
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: precession of mercury
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1
  • From: Uncle Ben
• precession of mercury
  • From: dseppala
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: glird
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: Dono
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The End Of American Capitalism
  • From: davidmabus
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Tim BandTech.com
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Auto Insurance Center - Auto Insurance Quote
  • From: darpana . 1226
• Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory
  • From: Hayek
• Re: You guys should look up St Augustine and Time
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: About " The third Newton's law ".
  • From: socratus
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory
  • From: glird
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: doug
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: xxein
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Igor
• Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory
  • From: xxein
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: PD
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: bjones
• Re: How long will the relativist Brother-hood stand this ?
  • From: Hayek
• Re: How long will the relativist Brother-hood stand this ?
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory
  • From: glird
• Re: How long will the relativist Brother-hood stand this ?
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: How long will the relativist Brother-hood stand this ?
  • From: Hayek
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: PD
• Re: How long will the relativist Brother-hood stand this ?
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: About " The third Newton's law ".
  • From: socratus
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: bjones
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: !
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: About " The third Newton's law ".
  • From: socratus
• Re: About " The third Newton's law ".
  • From: Tom Roberts
• About " The third Newton's law ".
  • From: socratus
• Einstein and Eddington, SAT 22, 21:10 GMT BBC2
  • From: Hayek
• "Gravity"
  • From: Osp
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: PD
• Re: New proof of e=mc2
  • From: Androcles
• How long will the relativist Brother-hood stand this ?
  • From: Hayek
• Re: New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• New knock to geometrical view of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: !
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity of events
  • From: rbwinn
• News: e=mc2: 103 years later, Einstein's proven right
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Analytically Exact Calculation of Yang Mills Action -- Looking for Feedback on a Research Direction
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: simultaneity of events
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory
  • From: xxein
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity of events
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity of events
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity of events
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity of events
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: PD
• For Gisse, From Einstein.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: bjones
• Re: New nonsense by automated bot
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: simultaneity of events
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: bjones
• Re: simultaneity of events
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: bjones
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: !
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: John Kennaugh
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Osp
• The solution to all problems in quantum physics and cosmic observations
  • From: john
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Tim BandTech.com
• Re: simultaneity of events
  • From: Dono
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: harry
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Tim BandTech.com
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: harry
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity of events
  • From: RP
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: new insult by banned nasty troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity of events
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: harry
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: harry
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: John Kennaugh
• !
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• What is the shape of the multiverse?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: simultaneity of events
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: simultaneity of events
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: simultaneity of events
  • From: RP
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: Dono
• Re: simultaneity of events
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• simultaneity of events
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: PD
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Tim BandTech.com
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: Dono
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Dono
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: kenseto
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Dono
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: harry
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: Open access physics papers
  • From: Dono
• Gravations passing from the 10th dimension through to the 11th dimensional membrane.
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Hayek
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Dono
• Open access physics papers
  • From: ehudza
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Dono
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Hayek
• Gerald Lebau loosing it
  • From: Dono
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: glird
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: glird
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: Dono
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dono
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: glird
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dono
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Dono
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: Dono
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Dono
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Shithead Juan R. Gonzalez Alvarez keeps on posting
  • From: Dono
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: harry
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: harry
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: new insults by troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: new lies and strawman by Eric Gisse
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Hayek
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1
  • From: wugi
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: Dono
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: Igor
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: PD
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1
  • From: wugi
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN
  • From: Hayek
• Re: DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN
  • From: Hayek
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1
  • From: PD
• Re: The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1
  • From: rotchm
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: PD
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: rotchm
• The Andromeda Paradox - Part 1
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: new lies and insults by Eric Gisse
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: PD
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: PD
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Dono
• Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues
  • From: Dono
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: shuba
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: maxwell
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Hayek
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Hayek
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: doug
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: PD
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Osp
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: PD
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: PD
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: new lies and insults by Eric Gisse
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New lies and insults by crackpot Eric Gisse
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: A weird but serious solution for the Schrödinger’s Cat paradox
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• A weird but serious solution for the Schrödinger’s Cat paradox
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Sitting at the center...
  • From: corgorant
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: xxein
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: harry
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: harry
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: YBM
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: PD
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: PD
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transforming coordinates
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: kenseto
• transforming coordinates
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: kenseto
• Re: PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• PD does not understand SR, Part II
  • From: bjones
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: bjones
• Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: You guys should look up St Augustine and Time
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: wugi
• Time
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: kenseto
• A weird but serious solution for the Schrödinger’s Cat paradox
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Everyone lies about sex as it always happens. Why?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Jim Newman
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: PD
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Hayek
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Everyone lies about sex as it always happens. Why?
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Sitting at the center...
  • From: Hayek
• Psychological Awareness of Time
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: maxwell
• Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Dono
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: Everyone lies about sex as it always happens. Why?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: kenseto
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: shuba
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: PD
• Re: Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones
  • From: PD
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Tim BandTech.com
• What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?
  • From: Ridwan
• Re: You guys should look up St Augustine and Time
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Sitting at the center...
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: SolomonW
• Re: R of S for Dummies
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• R of S for Dummies
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: RP
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: harry
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: harry
• Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory
  • From: xxein
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: harry
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: RP
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory
  • From: glird
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Optical Computing: special issue - Natural Computing, Springer
  • From: optical supercomputing
• Re: Sitting at the center...
  • From: Hayek
• Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Sitting at the center...
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: Moron Juashito Gonzalez is back
  • From: Dono
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: RP
• Physics and Geometry. / My opinion./
  • From: socratus
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sitting at the center...
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Sitting at the center...
  • From: Hayek
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Juan R.
• Mach's Principle by Bondi and Samuel.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: RP
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: RP
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: Moron Juashito Gonzalez is back
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: SolomonW
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: xxein
• Re: the more energy you use to acellerate the heaver the mass and density becomes.
  • From: pmb
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Optical Computing: special issue - Natural Computing, Springer
  • From: optical supercomputing
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Optical Computing: special issue - Natural Computing, Springer
  • From: optical supercomputing
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: GSS
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Hayek
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Wod
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Androcles
• Optical Computing: special issue - Natural Computing, Springer
  • From: optical supercomputing
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Hayek
• Re: DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN
  • From: Androcles
• Re: DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN
  • From: Hayek
• Re: DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Androcles
• Re: DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Hayek
• DECE SE FOLOSESTE NUMELE STAMENIN
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: doug
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues
  • From: Hayek
• Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: HIV Theory and TRUTH
  • From: Hayek
• Re: HIV Theory and TRUTH
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing
  • From: Dono
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Counterintuitivity
  • From: bjones
• Re: Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones
  • From: PD
• Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing
  • From: PD
• Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: harry
• Re: Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing
  • From: Juan R.
• Thermodynamics and relativity: cold clocks run faster than hot ones
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: HIV Theory and TRUTH
  • From: Hayek
• HIV Theory and TRUTH
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing
  • From: Albertito
• Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing
  • From: Dono
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing
  • From: Albertito
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Wod
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing
  • From: dlzc
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: harry
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: GSS
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists - LIARS
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists - LIARS
  • From: doug
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues
  • From: Hayek
• Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists - LIARS
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists - LIARS
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: New lies and strawman by crackpot Eric Gisse
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New lies and strawman by crackpot Eric Gisse
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues
  • From: Hayek
• Amazing breakthrough about gravitational lensing
  • From: Albertito
• Re: New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Hayek
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: doug
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists - LIARS
  • From: doug
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists - LIARS
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists - LIARS
  • From: doug
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: doug
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: doug
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Hayek
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists - LIARS
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: PD
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: PD
• Re: by reducing the over all resistance in to less tha 377 ohms
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: doug
• Re: by reducing the over all resistance in to less tha 377 ohms
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: PD
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: by reducing the over all resistance in to less tha 377 ohms
  • From: Sue...
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Strich.9
• New report on Science in the 21st century: social, political, and economic issues
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: PD
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: PD
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: GSS
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: bjones
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Hayek
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: bjones
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Hayek
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: Strich.9
• After 3 days, the relativists cannot apply their theory on a simple case
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: PD
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: PD
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Androcles
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Wod
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Dono
• cheap wholesale joran shoes and air force one
  • From: nikesoso1@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: by reducing the over all resistance in to less tha 377 ohms
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: PD
• Re: by reducing the over all resistance in to less tha 377 ohms
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: PD
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: GSS
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: harry
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: YBM
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: holog
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: holog
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: YBM's problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: YBM's problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The Universe is at least 156 Billions light years wide ...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Hayek
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: Hayek
• Re: YBM's problem
  • From: Igor
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: YBM
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: YBM
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: by reducing the over all resistance in to less tha 377 ohms
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: YBM
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: YBM
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: YBM
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: PD can lie, but he still cannot find time dilation
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: In English: Where is Time Dilation?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: PD
• Re: by reducing the over all resistance in to less tha 377 ohms
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: the more energy you use to acellerate the heaver the mass and density becomes.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: PD can lie, but he still cannot find time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: PD
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• the more energy you use to acellerate the heaver the mass and density becomes.
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PD can lie, but he still cannot find time dilation
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PD can lie, but he still cannot find time dilation
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: RustyJames
• A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: YBM
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: jem
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: jem
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: jem
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: jem
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: harry
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: Strich.9
• by reducing the over all resistance in to less tha 377 ohms
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: harry
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: PD can lie, but he still cannot find time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Hayek
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: harry
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: YBM's problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: YBM's problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: YBM's problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: harry
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: harry
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Doug can whine and bicker, but he cannot identify the time dilated clock
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: In English: Where is Time Dilation?
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: Strich.9
• Relativists claim to have answered a question but have no answer
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Doug can whine and bicker, but he cannot identify the time dilated clock
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: In English: Where is Time Dilation?
  • From: doug
• Re: Relativists cannot find the time dilating clock anymore
  • From: doug
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: doug
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Time Dilation disappears
  • From: doug
• Re: Relativists cannot find the time dilating clock anymore
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Relativists cannot find the time dilating clock anymore
  • From: doug
• Re: Doug can whine and bicker, but he cannot identify the time dilated clock
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: In English: Where is Time Dilation?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Relativists cannot find the time dilating clock anymore
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Relativists cannot find the time dilating clock anymore
  • From: doug
• Re: In English: Where is Time Dilation?
  • From: doug
• Re: Doug can whine and bicker, but he cannot identify the time dilated clock
  • From: doug
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: doug
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Doug can whine and bicker, but he cannot identify the time dilated clock
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• PD can lie, but he still cannot find time dilation
  • From: strich . 9991
• Relativists cannot find the time dilating clock anymore
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Time Dilation disappears
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: doug
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: doug
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: doug
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: doug
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: PD
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: PD
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: xxein
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: xxein
• Re: WHERE IS TIME DILATION?
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: PD
• Re: YBM's problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: YBM's problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: YBM's problem
  • From: Igor
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: doug
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: doug
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: doug
• In English: Where is Time Dilation?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: PD
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: YBM's problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: YBM's problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: harry
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: doug
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: harry
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: harry
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: YBM's problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: YBM
• Re: YBM's problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: YBM
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Counterintuitivity
  • From: shuba
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: doug
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: John Park
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: YBM
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: YBM's problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: Juan R.
• YBM's problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: doug
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: doug
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: doug
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: doug
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: PD
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: doug
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: harry
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: YBM
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: PD
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: PD
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: harry
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: Counterintuitivity
  • From: Alen
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: YBM
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: YBM
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: harry
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Dono
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: doug
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: doug
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: harry
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: doug
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• May sound silly, but then it isn't my theory.
  • From: RP
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• A SINGLE CLOCK CANNOT HAVE TWO READINGS IN A SINGLE FRAME.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: YBM
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• PD has been LYING and DENYING in sci.physics for a long time...
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: doug
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: YBM
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: YBM
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: xxein
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: xxein
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: doug
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Dono
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: doug
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: doug
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: doug
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: doug
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: doug
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: doug
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: doug
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: YBM
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: Dono
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: Dono
• A Simplified explanation for scientists
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: doug
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: doug
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: maxwell
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: PD
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: strich . 9991
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Wod
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: The Universe is at least 156 Billions light years wide ...
  • From: SolomonW
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: PD
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The Universe is at least 156 Billions light years wide ...
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: harry
• Re: Counterintuitivity
  • From: shuba
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: xxein
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Sue...
• ABOU THE VICIOUS CIRCLES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Relativity expert...! this is for you
  • From: Nimo
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: Obama declares change in the speed of light
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Physics Aptitude Test for the EPG.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• The Universe is at least 156 Billions light years wide ...
  • From: Noah's Dove
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Obama declares change in the speed of light
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: Hayek
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: Hayek
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: glird
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: "modern physics"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: PD
• "modern physics"
  • From: holog
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: PD
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: RP
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: doug
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Sensation in Physics: Nimtz doeble prism experiment proven by the complex index theory of light.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Occamʼs razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Occam’s razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Occam’s razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Occam’s razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Occam’s razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Occam’s razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Occam’s razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: YBM
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: doug
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: doug
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: doug
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: doug
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: mick
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: Physics Aptitude Test for the EPG.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Moron Juan Alvarez Gonzalez
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: new lie and insults by nasty troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: MORON Juanshito Gonzalez Alvarez thinks that GP-B is set to measure GR waves
  • From: Dono
• MORON Juanshito Gonzalez Alvarez thinks that GP-B is set to measure GR waves
  • From: Dono
• Re: new lie and insults by nasty troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: new lie and insults by nasty troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: doug
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: doug
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: doug
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: strich . 9991
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Kin
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: doug
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: harry
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Moron Juashito Gonzalez is back
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Some fringe stuff to add to the Experimental Basis of Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Some fringe stuff to add to the Experimental Basis of Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: harry
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Image uploaded...! from your observation whats the conclusion.
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Physics Aptitude Test for the EPG.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: new lie by Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: harry
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: harry
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Image uploaded...! from your observation whats the conclusion.
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Some fringe stuff to add to the Experimental Basis of Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: Hayek
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: Hayek
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: Hayek
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: xxein
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: doug
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: harry
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: doug
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Dono
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: doug
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Dono
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Dono
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Dono
• Re: new insults and nonsenses by crackpot Eric Gisse
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: new insults and nonsenses by crackpot Eric Gisse
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Image uploaded...! from your observation whats the conclusion.
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY
  • From: doug
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Image uploaded...! from your observation whats the conclusion.
  • From: Nimo
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: new insults and nonsenses by crackpot Eric Gisse
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Sue...
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Sue...
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Image uploaded...! from your observation whats the conclusion.
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Isotropy in both space and time.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: rotchm
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: doug
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Physics Aptitude Test for the EPG.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: dseppala
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: OG
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: dseppala
• Re: $10,000 reward!
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: $10,000 reward!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: $10,000 reward!
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: $10,000 reward!
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Physics Aptitude Test for the EPG.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Isotropy in both space and time.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Isotropy in both space and time.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: about space - time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: about space - time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Isotropy in both space and time.
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: OG
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: rotchm
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: xxein
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: xxein
• Re: Isotropy in both space and time.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Isotropy in both space and time.
  • From: xxein
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: holog
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: dseppala
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: $10,000 reward!
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: $10,000 reward!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Isotropy in both space and time.
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: OG
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: rotchm
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: harry
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: strich . 9991
• Simultaneous events and gravity (and other forces)
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: $10,000 reward!
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 1
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: harry
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: about space - time
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: harry
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Nudism pre teens video ogg vorbis ohsaa unofficial football
  • From: friendes
• bonnes affaires solde bonnes affaires lesbians fucking gallery lindsay
  • From: friendes
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• GLAMOUR GIRLS... U JUST CLICK...
  • From: babu
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Patek Philippe Calatrava 18kt Yellow Gold Diamond Ladies Watch 4906-101J Collection
  • From: hlbobo023
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: harry
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Hand holding notes to GUT and TOE group theory via email
  • From: akalaniz
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: $10,000 reward!
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: about space - time
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: xxein
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: doug
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: about space - time
  • From: holog
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: harry
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: $10,000 reward!
  • From: Dono
• Re: $10,000 reward!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: $10,000 reward!
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: $10,000 reward!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: bjones
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: $10,000 reward!
  • From: Dono
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: about space - time
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: PD
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• about space - time
  • From: ashu
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• 21 hand holding pages of QFT (summing: think Feynman) and group theory made easy--will email file
  • From: akalaniz
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: The Missing Symbol.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: harry
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: The Missing Symbol.
  • From: glird
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Dono
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Dono
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Contradictions?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Edward Green
• Contradictions?
  • From: RP
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: YBM
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: rwjefferson
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: xxein
• Re: Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations
  • From: Dono
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Why Einstein was wrong about relativity (New Scientist)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Edward Green
• cheap jordan shoes
  • From: nikesoso1
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Hayek
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Kin
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein reborn as Yedi.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: The Alpha and Omega of Special Relativity & Co.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Alpha and Omega of Special Relativity & Co.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Alpha and Omega of Special Relativity & Co.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Hayek
• Re: The Alpha and Omega of Special Relativity & Co.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein reborn as Yedi.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Sue...
• The Alpha and Omega of Special Relativity & Co.
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein reborn as Yedi.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein reborn as Yedi.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Einstein reborn as Yedi.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: YBM
• Re: I have got an idea!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Einstein reborn as Yedi.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations
  • From: Igor
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Igor
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: PD
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Don Stockbauer