Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
- From: "Spirit of Truth" <juneharton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 23:48:04 -0700
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d084adaa-8f36-4b2f-b940-ed68c8349c6d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Oct 23, 10:54 pm, "Spirit of Truth" <junehar...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Androcles" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:COYLk.219959$zj5.50421@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
that math is correct but WRONG
Well, Androcles, at least you got that correct. You see, math
can well well be correct in itself but factors that should be in the math
can be omitted. The math can be actually only applicable to
a science-fiction universe...which is the case with SR and GR.
NOW is a common NOW to all,
What makes you say that?
so lack of simultaneity is
obviously incorrect and SR and GR have been misleading people
since at least 1905.
Spirit of Truth
......................................................................................................
......................................................................................................
BECAUSE lack of simultaneity causes absurd SR FACTS
like you see in the Andromeda Paradox in the link below:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special_Relativity/Simultaneity%2C_time_dilation_and_length_contraction
Spirit of Truth
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
- Next by Date: The Alpha and Omega of Special Relativity & Co.
- Previous by thread: Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
- Next by thread: Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
