Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX

Hayek schrieb:

As I already mentioned: nobody has to "believe" anything. Just have a
look on the facts.

Which you do not.

I do.

I would
have to know what scientists think "time dilation" is.

I have already explained it: clocks will measure different durations
between given events, depending on the worldlines on which they travel.

And static clocks, just do magic.

No, static clocks do just the same. Static clocks travel through
spacetime along worldlines as well. Don't mix up space with spacetime.
Besides: the term "static" makes only sense in your chosen frame of
reference, and physics does not depend on the choice of reference frame.

I do believe
that a clock in a moving frame of reference is slower than a clock in
a frame of reference at rest.

There is no difference between a "moving frame of reference" and a
"frame of reference at rest" (you can choose this as you like), thus it
cannot be the explanation.

Not really, there is a preferential frame, the mass distribution of all
the masses around it(galaxies, universe) . This is the frame that causes
inertia in the first place, and makes all the frames move inertial.

No. Masses don't have anything to do with reference frames. A reference
frame is a coordinate system you introduce, so that you can label the
events of spacetime with coordinates (x, y, z, t).

Will a handwritten testimony of Einstein himself do ?
http://www.xs4all.nl/~notime/inert/gravp543.html

There ist no "handwritten testimony" of Einstein, and nevertheless
"testimonies" are not helpful in physics. Concerning gravitation and
inertia, you should read e.g. this book by Ciufolini and Wheeler:

http://press.princeton.edu/titles/5635.html

MfG,
Juergen
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: time dilation
    ... the laws of physics must remain the same in all frames of reference. ... train car to the floor, it falls a distance of y'. ... In the Lorentz equations, a clock in S', the frame of reference ... I don't need to use pendulum clocks. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
    ... these facts are relative to the frame of reference. ... he is experiencing time dilation. ... that he is moving,m by seeing all those clocks coming in and going out ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Astronomers Vs Harrison (clock maker) ref Longitude problem
    ... Your introduction of a 'frame of reference' for clocks and axial ... the pace of a clock to axial rotation is evident to all. ...
    (uk.sci.astronomy)
  • Re: Reviewing Statements in Einsteins 1905 paper.
    ... with the adoption of the second postulate. ... of reference, which is allthe standard metre requires). ... tilted time lines and out of sync clocks would be ... Agreed, nothing changed within a frame, just our preception of how ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
    ... >>in motion relative to himself to shrink, and measures clocks in motion ... you are saying that Einstein assumed the observer using the Lorentz ... same speed in all directions in his own frame. ... plugging numbers into the Lorentz transformation, ...
    (sci.physics)
Loading