Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX

Jürgen Clade wrote:
rbwinn schrieb:

[...]
Well, I do not know if I believe in "time dilation" or not.

As I already mentioned: nobody has to "believe" anything. Just have a
look on the facts.

Which you do not.

I would
have to know what scientists think "time dilation" is.

I have already explained it: clocks will measure different durations
between given events, depending on the worldlines on which they travel.

And static clocks, just do magic.


I do believe
that a clock in a moving frame of reference is slower than a clock in
a frame of reference at rest.

There is no difference between a "moving frame of reference" and a
"frame of reference at rest" (you can choose this as you like), thus it
cannot be the explanation.

Not really, there is a preferential frame, the mass distribution of all the masses around it(galaxies, universe) . This is the frame that causes inertia in the first place, and makes all the frames move inertial.

Will a handwritten testimony of Einstein himself do ?
http://www.xs4all.nl/~notime/inert/gravp543.html

Uwe Hayek.


The Galilean transformation equations
show that it is slower.

No, they don't. According to the Galilean transformation equations, t = t'.

MfG,
Juergen


--
Als ik nu op dit moment geld transfereer [in België] naar een
andere rekening staat dat een uur later daar gecrediteerd.
-- Boutros Gali, realiteitsdeskundige.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
    ... SR claims A runs slower than B in the frame ... of reference where B is at rest, but SR also claims that B runs ... The Nobel Committee avoids committing itself to the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Relativity is wrong because there is a preferred frame of reference
    ... SR claims A runs slower than B in the frame ... of reference where B is at rest, but SR also claims that B runs ... The Nobel Committee avoids committing itself to the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Tidal Effects
    ... "The equivalence between inertia and gravity cannot explain these tidal ... effects - it cannot explain the variation of the gravitational field ... built upon an ambiguous selection of reference frame: ... reference for the question the earth, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
    ... Cartesian coordinates S to represent the frame of reference of the ... where it is reflected by the mirror. ... Nobody knows the essence of the physics they are talking ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: .Re: Why all the fascination with E = mc^2 ??
    ... specific frame of reference. ... >> No. Einstein took the classical Conservation of Energy is both frames. ... >> had already calculated how the energy of radiation transforms between ...
    (sci.physics)
Loading