Re: ABOUT THE GALILEI PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY

On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 17:17:02 -0800 (PST), rbwinn <rbwinn3@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Nov 6, 1:48?pm, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 06:46:40 -0800, doug <x...@xxxxxx> wrote:

rbwinn wrote:

{snip much babbling}

What I would like to do is apply these principles to orbits using the
principle of equivalence and gravitation the way Newton did. ?I have
not yet had a chance to do this because when I get on sci.physics.
relativity, most of my time is engaged in responding to inanities.

No, people have shown your errors for many years but you cannot
understand them. You just keep repeating the same nonsense.

Secondly, I have misplaced my physics book that had Newton's
equations, so I am slow to get started on this.

It is too bad that you do not have internet access. There is
a search engine called Google out there that could help you.

?You seem to have some
of this better thought out than I do. ?As I say, I am working as a
snail's pace on this because I only have a high school education,

and you have never studied any physics or math and have wasted
much time thrashing around uselessly in your ignorance.

?and
have never been able to convince anyone else about n' and the slower
clock in the moving frame of reference.

You have been shown to be wrong many times and that is why you can
not convince anyone of your ideas.

?Disciples of Einstein are
very derisive, and Lorentz ether theory disciples believe in a length
contraction the same as Einstein disciples. ?You are the first person
I have seen in this newsgroup who is also using the Galilean
transformation equations.
Robert B. Winn

You have found another crank who does not understand relativity either.
Have fun.

The principle of relativity is easy to understand. It's nothing more than
dx1/dt =(dx1/dx2).(dx2/dt).

The einsteinian interpretaion is also easy to understand because of its obvious
flaws.

Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So what are x1 and x2, Henri?

Coordinates on axes drawn in the direction of frame movement. x1 is at rest in
frame 1. x2 is at rest in frame 2.

Robert B. Winn



Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The princile of the relativity.
    ... .THE METAMORPHOSES OF THE PRINCIPLE OF THE RELATIVITY. ... definition of the absolute system of coordinates as being a system ... The only issue is the definition of an inertial frame. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The princile of the relativity.
    ... .THE METAMORPHOSES OF THE PRINCIPLE OF THE RELATIVITY. ... All the laws of the mechanics are ... The only issue is the definition of an inertial frame. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The princile of the relativity.
    ... .THE METAMORPHOSES OF THE PRINCIPLE OF THE RELATIVITY. ... The only issue is the definition of an inertial frame. ... Einstein definition of the Galileian system of coordinates is a vacum ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread)
    ... > "If we were to accept the relativity principle, ... same value in any frame. ... principle imposes that the *measured* light speed is the same in any frame, ... Notice finally that he only said that c is common to gravity, ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: .Re: Why all the fascination with E = mc^2 ??
    ... >> plus terms of order v^4, where M is the mass of the body before radiation. ... >relatively stationary frame. ... of Einstein's Principle of Relativity. ... relativity if you didn't know the principle. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)