Re: HIV Theory and TRUTH

Strich.9 wrote:
On Nov 14, 8:09 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:24:39 +0100, Hayek <haye...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Juan R. González-Álvarez wrote:
What issue of the report has surprised you more and why?
I knew it was bad, but it did not know it was this bad.
It is guild protection as it used to exist in the middle Ages in our
regions.
And then it only half of the equation, like with Schon and also with
Catherine Verfaillie, and the hiv-aids debacle. They can publish all
kinds of nonsense, and mostly get away with it. If they get caught, like
Schon, is because they submitted twice the same graph.
Uwe Hayek.
How does someone with no medical education objectively evaluate the
vast literature on HIV and AIDS? Or something more relevant to this
newsgroup: relativity and the non-existence of the aether? You are
uneducated in both fields yet show zero humility.

I fail to see how you are different from the varying wingnuts who
dispute a large body of evidence with cries of conspiracy or other
equally stupid arguments.

Tell us again why you are more intelligent and better educated than
the people who have spent years studying the subject.
What makes you so fucking special?

I'm afraid I have to agree with Eric on this one. I saw the article
as well and the first several paragraphs were mere innuendo.

The article ? I read more than thousand dissident articles.
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/find.htm

It is a complex subject which is data intensive.
You want data ?

http://failingsofhivaidstheory.homestead.com/MedSeminar.pdf

Uwe Hayek.

But the truth, if
different from the current version, will eventually make its way out.
Perhaps not now, but sooner or later. And how do I knowthat? By
this theorem:

The TRUTH CONJECTURE: The truth represents the simplest account for
any set of events. Any account different from the truth will
eventually simply to the underlying truth.
.

Quantcast