Re: Time Dilation disappears


<zarmewa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5f57cf14-93b7-4092-b8fd-73d436436d2f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sorry for the intruption

Consider four clocks in order to measure the time of light to reach
earth from sun.

First clock is at the center of sun
Second is on sun (stationary)
Third one is traveling along with photon at speed of light and
Fourth is on earth (stationary)

Clock stop or almost close to zero at the center of gravity of sun
(where all gravitational force cancel each other) if there is no other
gravitational force except sun ? Not sure but guess

Clock undergone traveling will show less than 8.4 min due to time
dilation.
Clock on earth will show 8.4 min app

Which one of above is actual speed of light.

Is value of ?c? constant if clock 3 is actual speed light and time
dilation is true
==========================================

Doesn't matter since it's all done with algebraic smoke and mirrors.

Ref:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img22.gif


What kind of lunacy prompted Einstein to say
the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
the "time" each way is the same?


Your answer goes here:

________________________________________________________

Other answers have been:

According to the illiterate crank "Peter Webb"
<webbfamily@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Its two equations.
________________________________________________________

According to the novice mitch sperkins@xxxxxxxxx (or mitchs perkins)

because +v / -v cancel out?
________________________________________________________
According to the Pillock Shawn Pollock (aka mathkills):

Mikelzon Morrly, whatever.
What Einstein does is basically modify Galilean relativity as follows

X'=A(X-vt)
yes you [Androcles] are an ass (presumably because I asked the question)

________________________________________________________
According to glird the tord:

Both x and x' are in the domain of the function x |-> x' such that x' =
x-vt
________________________________________________________

According to Idiot Ian Parker:

We are not talking about the speed of light here we are talking
classical stability theory.
________________________________________________________
According to Cretin harald.vanlintelButNotThis@xxxxxxx

Easy: he did NOT say that.
According to cretin van lintel, Einstein did not write the equation he
wrote.
________________________________________________________
According to xxein (not a true dingleberry):
It is an artefactual/superficially imposed yin-yang of sorts.
________________________________________________________
According to Lamenting Shubert:
Why do you want to know?
________________________________________________________
According to Imbecile Jimmy Black:

" In neither system (meaning frame of reference in modern-day terminology)
is the speed of light c-v or c+v. In both systems the speed of light is c."

According to Imbecile Jimmy Black, Einstein did not write the equation he
wrote.
________________________________________________________
According to Cretin Dork Bruere

I don't give a damn what Einstein wrote.
________________________________________________________
According to Lying Little Shit Matthew Johnson

And even the question is wrong! For he never said any such thing.
This should be painfully obvious from what he _did_ say,
namely, that the vacuum speed of light is a constant of nature,
invariant under all admissable [sic] transformations between
inertial reference frames.

Apparently LLS Matthew Johnson has rewritten Einstein's paper.

A team of scientists working under the direction of researchers from the
University of Sussex have recently discovered that Einstein did not say
"inertial".

According to LLS Matthew Johnson, Einstein did not write the equation he
wrote.
________________________________________________________
According to Chief Wanker Uncle Stooopid Schwartz:

"c+v appears nowhere in the paper, nor could it. [sic]
According to Chief Wanker Uncle Stooopid, Einstein did not write the
equation he wrote.
________________________________________________________
According to Dolt "Spirit of Truth"

that math is correct but WRONG
________________________________________________________


Note: some names may be the aliases of a crank or cranks unknown.








.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: When will Friar Broccoli produce conclusive evidence that the
    ... orbits the sun? ... order to determine the kind of evidence you are asking for. ... Einstein and Mach both avered that it didn't matter because both were ... reproduced which indicate that the earth is not moving. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Light speed in emission theory
    ... for I claim that should I take a caesium or similar atomic clock ... Saturn it will remain synchronised with clocks ... on Earth and measure the period of Titan to be exactly the same (within ... That the light from Sun travels to Earth ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Light speed in emission theory
    ... for I claim that should I take a caesium or similar atomic clock ... Saturn it will remain synchronised with clocks ... on Earth and measure the period of Titan to be exactly the same (within ... That the light from Sun travels to Earth ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Alternative to the analemma hoax
    ... both the variations in the noon cycles and seasonal daylight/darkness ... Sun in winter and away in summer.,The Northern hemisphere does no such ... to say that the Earth axis has an angle relative to the plane of its ... "Huygens's clock was also the first to be accurate to minutes a day, ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: When will Friar Broccoli produce conclusive evidence that the
    ... orbits the sun? ... Einstein and Mach both avered that it didn't matter because both were ... reproduced which indicate that the earth is not moving. ... The relative motions seem to be consistent with a modified Tychoian ...
    (talk.origins)