Re: transforming coordinates

On Nov 19, 5:11�pm, YBM <ybm...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
rbwinn a �crit :





On Nov 19, 11:39 am, YBM <ybm...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
rbwinn a crit :

On Nov 18, 11:18 pm, YBM <ybm...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
rbwinn a crit :
On Nov 18, 6:00 pm, YBM <ybm...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
rbwinn a crit :
On Nov 18, 5:02 pm, YBM <ybm...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
rbwinn a crit :
,
and one by a scientist in France who extracted the following
equation
n'=t(1-v/c)
Stop lying.
Oh, don't be so modest, YBM. Anyone can go back and see the post
where you extracted the equation.
Right, and then see that follows a proof that n'=t(1-w/c) is meaningless
and contradictory on the simpliest case.
But you know that, don't you? Otherwise you wouldn't forget this
equation everytime I recall this fact by posting again the plain
GT equations and pretending I would have written that GT is meaningless.
Which is not what I wrote, and you know that.
A central value in science is honesty. Every of your posts show your
complete, absolute lack of honesty.
Well, whatever your intentions were, you did derive the equation,
which is something I had not yet done. I have to give credit where
credit is due.
If you want to give me credit for what I'v done, please add "who has
then proven my 'slow clock theory' to be absurd" at every mention of
what you improperly call a "derivation".
Otherwise I won't forget to give you credit for your dishonesty.
Moreover, one of these days, you could get the kick in the ass you
deserve.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I don't recall seeing your proof of the "slow clock theory' being
absurd. Would you mind posting it again?
References :
49188b96$0$24212$426a3...@xxxxxxxxxxxx
4918693f$0$14484$426a3...@xxxxxxxxxxxx
49180ed5$0$2329$426a7...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/MovingAtRest.html
4917a115$0$14756$426a7...@xxxxxxxxxxxx
49179e45$0$11775$426a7...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/4fd428622f9...Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Sorry, YBM, that does not work with me. �

Not because of the proofs, but because of your mental disabilities
and deep dishonesty. What shall I do about that? Kick you in the ass?



Here is what you would have
to disprove.
...
� � � � � � � n'= t(1-v/w)

Done.-

That means about as much as walking up to another person and yelling,
"Checkmate."
The question that would have to be asked is, "Where is the chess
set?"
Robert B. Winn
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: transforming coordinates
    ... credit is due. ... Moreover, one of these days, you could get the kick in the ass you ... Sorry, YBM, that does not work with me. ... and deep dishonesty. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: ZeN/NZ
    ... I give credit where credit is due. ... Absurd, but remarkably familiar. ... I tried the Vista speech recognition by running the tutorial. ...
    (rec.games.abstract)
  • Re: Ford 2.3i 16v engines (Pingu RichardK)
    ... >> absolute steal than I'd originally given it credit for, ... >> kick myself to this day for missing out on it... ... > IIRC, it's also tuneable to 250+ bhp whilst still being tractable, ...
    (uk.rec.cars.misc)
  • Re: The odds
    ... Most of you guys are not giving Evans much credit because he is boring. ... So he will be fresh enough to KICK ASS on the ITT! ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)
  • Re: transforming coordinates
    ... A central value in science is honesty. ... credit is due. ... then proven my 'slow clock theory' to be absurd" at every mention of ... Would you mind posting it again? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast