Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory

On Nov 21, 3:47 pm, glird <gl...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 20, 8:52 pm,xxein<xxe...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<We need the thread that ties.  It will provide the understanding of the structure of our universe and beyond. >

  You are SO right! !!

  Here it is:    "LET MATTER BE COMPRESSIBLE!"

 Think about it; and follow the ramifications.  If and when you do,
you will understand everything in the universe, including what it's
made of and how it works.

glird

xxein: No reason to get that drastic. But they do compress (energy
to matter). They also reach a compression point for which it becomes
unstable due to a gravity.

We have to find out why energy gets entangled and regions of it can
get reduced in the overall energy equilibrium (usually expanding)
therefor causing a gravity toward that point (centric).

Self-similarity and adiabatics are certainly recognizable features.
We need to study them with a different approach. Self-similarities
seem to be fairly stable but transient forms of existence. Adiabatics
seems to define the unstableness between these transitions.

We have quantumly invented all kinds of things. Most of which we can
measure. The graviton is not going to be one of them. Gravity has a
different character. It is the ability of the rest of the quantum
particles to self-simulate into a form; and through adiabatics to
define them. But the process continues as they lock themselves out of
an ambient energy (the more basic energy equilibrium).

What this says, in effect, is that all pure energy might not have been
released equally into an expansion. Do an analysis of how a modicum
of gas releases and you will see different pressures all over the
place (both concentric (r) and along any circumference).

Nothing is perfect. That is why we have the diversity we do.

We don't even know if our universe is not one born out of a BH that
may exist in a super-universe comprised of trillions of BH's. The
speed of light will not allow us to see that.

And that brings up another interesting point (oh, so many). Light is
affected by gravity. Is it affected by the universal expansion?
There is a lot of science here that is lost to theories that are so
subjective to what we think we measure in an objective universe.

There is much more to be learned if we get our heads out of the same
traditional structural thoughts. OK. We tried that forever with
variable failure. Where is the future? Surely, we will not get a
TOE. Can we get closer? Yes. It may take a lucky guess (actually,
it does). But does that guess really lead us closer, or does it take
us down another wrong path? Who is smart enough to decide that?

I haven't exactly just been sitting on my ass since 1985. My method
of exploration seems to be eliminating the illogical theories and
examining them to find out where they became illogical. They all
become illogical through subjective measurement even when they attempt
to describe it.

They had no correct notion of an objective behavior derived from a
subjective sense of measurement even though they have a spectrum of
data from Q to U.

I think I fare better if only by degree.
.

Relevant Pages

  • T5HE UNIVERSE IS GOD
    ... RELATIVE TO THE REST OF THE UNIVERSE. ... PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY ... THE FORCE OF GRAVITY IS AN ILLUSION ...
    (sci.physics)
  • =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_Schr=F6dinger=27s_Universe?=
    ... This puts us back into a steady state universe again because if you ... cannot discern acceleration from gravity ... quanta bits, the same as energy. ... the emitting and receiving electrons are involved and if these "see" ...
    (sci.edu)
  • Re: An explanation for the increasing expansion
    ... > Yes, but he did that so as to come up with a static universe, and he ... then the forces of expansion and gravity must be close to ... > already delicate equilibrium which keeps the universe from collapsing? ... constituant energy, with the center as just a point of focus, rather ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Special relativity, the expanding universe and dark energy
    ... The theory says only that the universe ... one needs a working Quantum Theory of Gravity. ... > inflation part of the big bang theory doesn't seem rational.) ... and they are slowly converting mass into energy. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • What is the Universe made from? GR 17 Dublin, July 2004
    ... WHAT IS THE UNIVERSE MADE OF? ... Einstein’s gravity emerges from the ... Both dark energy and dark matter are simply residual total zero ...
    (sci.math)
Loading