Re: Query about Range of validity of field equations in Quantum Field Theory

On Nov 22, 5:50 am, Hayek <haye...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
xxeinwrote:
We have quantumly invented all kinds of things.  Most of which we can
measure.  The graviton is not going to be one of them.  Gravity has a
different character.  It is the ability of the rest of the quantum
particles to self-simulate into a form;

The way I see itxxein, that there is only one thing
that is quantized, and that is the unit of work.

Nature does this by making inertia fail, at uncertainty
conditions. Nature does not allow to store  energy in
the form of inertia, at any energy level lower than
this. It is not the electric, magnetic, or
electromagnetic phenomena that are quantized, it is
inertia, a component of the gravitational field that
fails at small scales. Thus in fact, quantization has
only one cause, the failure of inertia/gravitation.

Now, how can we quantize gravitation ?

That is the problems with physics nowadays, all
calculation, and certainly not knowing what they are doing.

This leads me to say :

"Quantum Gravity is an oxymoron"

Uwe Hayek.

xxein: Forgive me for not responding sooner. Reading, thinking,
contemplation and absorbing a thought may look different on a day by
day basis. This comes from being unsure of what the physic really
is. We fluctuate, by forgetting some things only to remember others.
This makes a belief transient. Is it short or long term? Only a look
at history can answer that. We do poorly as the track record shows.

But you are speaking in riddles. If inertia fails at small scales,
would you like to say that gravity doesn't? I don't get your point.

I'll give you my opinion regarding this, though. Inertia can exist
with matter and energy. Matter and energy cannot completely fill a
void. They have the potential, not mere properties or a web, that
allows them to move and interact. It is the 'move part' that is
continuous. It is the interaction that is wanted to be quantized.

We know that something goes from here to there. We fail to see that
our measurement of it all requires that we measure it with something.
That is where the quantization steps in. It is not in a movement such
a gravity or expansion provides; it becomes the granular scale because
of what we can measure it with.

OK. Why can't we measure a continuity at small scale, you might ask.
Think about it. Every one of the smallest structures of matter was
formed by an incongruity of the energy it interacted with. They were
formed as a coalescent energy that differed from the free energy.
Yadda, yadda, yadda.

We might not know exactly how or why how this happens, but we do know
that is how this works (to the very best of our knowledge).

What this means is that matter, itself, exists in a quantum state.
Only a less infinite and imperfect form of energy can form to be
matter. We are it.

It is quantum to our measurement because our tools to measure are
already quantiumized. They exist as lumps of energy in it's own
system of existing as what we call matter.

We know matter changes in "quantum leaps". There is nothing wrong
with that behavior. It is how we measure it. We are the continuously
quantum leap that measures it.

We know of adiabatic behavior (and I'll throw in chaos that somehow
leads to self-similarity).

You have a lot more thinking to do outside the normal channels that
any existing physical theory can provide. Step into the water. It is
not as cold as you may think it is.

Right now, you have solidified yourself into a winter and are walking
on thin ice. Yeah, the water is cold. Come summer, you might wish to
take a swim. But there is no season for thoughts. I can only hope
that you can understand the physic from without a preformed belief.

I wish you well.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... > force when the conversation is about gravity. ... >> What makes you think you can isolate a quantum Aether unit? ... >> Mass is just a dimension. ... the kinetic energy is equal to half the ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... > force when the conversation is about gravity. ... >> What makes you think you can isolate a quantum Aether unit? ... >> Mass is just a dimension. ... the kinetic energy is equal to half the ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... > force when the conversation is about gravity. ... >> What makes you think you can isolate a quantum Aether unit? ... >> Mass is just a dimension. ... the kinetic energy is equal to half the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: GRAVITATION
    ... values that are meaningful to the hydrogen atom, ... Gravity can't be shielded like EM can be for one. ... That is how quantum tweeezers work. ... energy sea would have to be "less than virtual". ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation
    ... we see as changes in motion due to what we call gravity. ... >It would violate the law of conservation of energy. ... matter expanding be a problem? ... rather than from principles ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)