Re: Dono, the most despicable crackpot trolling the forum also trolls the Wikipedia now

On 25 dic, 15:39, pmb <pm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 22, 10:28 am, "Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Do you remember that in the past Dono deleted his messages for hidding
his ignorance about relativistic Lagrangians?

Yes. I found that to be a very childish action. It showed his true
nature.

Agree.

During months, Dono failed to solve the elementary exercise of
obtaining the relativistic Hamiltonian from the given Lagrangian. > > He
gave us up to six nonsensical Hamiltonians (see the list in above
link).

He's not going to solve a problem like that since in doing it
coirrectly will show that he made a mistake in the past and you know
how some people can be about admitting to their mistakes. Another
childish attribute!

After dono was showed to be a complete ignorant in
electrodynamics,
mechanics, and relativity, I give to him the correct answer in
above
blog the day 12.

Is he the one that didn't understand the derivation I provided for > the
cyclotron? The one that confused it with Newtonian physics because > the
equations looked the same? LOL!

In my opinion, the more interesting aspect of those individuals is not
their obvious ignorance of most elementary aspects of electrodynamics,
mechanics, relativity... but their *arrogance*.

They write nonsense but still present themselves as knowledgeable
people :-)

Do you think he did learn something?

We can't say what they learn. We can only speak of what they display
and they will never display the fact that they made an error in the
past and therefore cannot display learning from their mistakes.

No, he decided to edit the
Wikipedia and then cite the article he had modified with another
nonsensical Hamiltonian against me!!!

I hope you didn't expect anything less, did you?

I waited all kind of nonsense and childish behavior in this newsgroup.
But, sincerely, I never imagined that dono could write such nonsense
in Wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&oldid=258225623

and believe that nobody would delete it. Of course, dono evident
nonsense was deleted by wikipedia user JRSpriggs the day 16

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&oldid=258431423

but dono resubmitted the same nonsense again!

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&oldid=258471322

Finally that kind of nonsense has been definitively eliminated from
Wikipedia but still he wrote some wrong stuff in the last editing.

There is a special talk in wikipedia related to Dono nonsensical
'contributions' (aka vandalism). Of course, Dono nonsense was
deleted
many times by other users, Dono resubmitted and was deleted
again. He
gave up to 45 editings of Wikipedia article in last four days!!!!

I'm glad that some knowledgebale and intelligent people are there to
correct his many mistakes

Indeed, also dono unfounded accusations in other wikipedia articles
have been deleted by other users!

I also invited people to submit art about the troll dono and
received
several pictures (see the blog) and also a funny talk that
simulates a
talk with dono

http://www.geocities.com/albertzotkin/usenet_talk.html

It is all for fun. Visit next links and enjoy:

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html

No thanks. I'm trying not to get down in the mud anymore. I don't
want to be like dono and others.

Of course, my only interest in people as dono was sociological. Once
exposed as the true ignorant troll he is I have started to ignore his
usual nonsensical messages showing the little he knows about physics.

Best wishes

And Happy Holidays Pete!
.