Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.

On Jan 2, 3:55 am, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 00:54:37 -0800 (PST), Jerry <Cephalobus_alie...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 4:28 pm, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:

Let me explain again..... read carefully.
If a space telescope is sent into a circular ecliptic orbit and is accurately
aligned with a star that lies right on the ecliptic polar axis and if that
telescope spins on a similarly aligned axis once per its orbit period, the
image of that star will remain exactly in the viewing centre.

(sigh)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Your description of your proposal is ambiguous, but no matter how
it is interpreted, IT DOESN'T WORK.

You got it all wrong.
My telescope is actually orbiting the SUN not the Earth

You keep keep shifting your position, you weasel. How can anybody
discuss anything with you, when you keep altering your claims
and then LIE about your previous position?

Back in December, you EXPLICITLY DENIED that your proposal
involved solar orbit, but instead would work for a satellite in
Earth orbit.

On Thu, 25 Dec 2008, I pointed out:
A satellite in ecliptic orbit around the Sun at one of
Earth's stable Lagrangian points will still observe aberration.

to which you replied:
Who said anything about Lagrangian points. By "In ecliptic orbit" I
meant "in
an Earth orbit in the ecliptic plane". Do you understand now Crank?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/8736a4b9e99c2a4b

This will go on my lies list.

Besides which, your proposal STILL doesn't work for reasons that
both Paul and I have explained to you before, but which I will
put into a separate post so as not to clutter up this one.

Jerry
Henri Wilson's Lies
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/diploma.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/deception.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/rt_aurigae.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/history.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/snips.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/accuses.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/oh_dear.htm


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Physics Behind Contractions.
    ... If a space telescope is sent into a circular ecliptic orbit and is accurately ... This will go on my lies list. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The Physics Behind Contractions.
    ... If a space telescope is sent into a circular ecliptic orbit and is acc ... an Earth orbit in the ecliptic plane". ... the earth-sun Lagrange points follow the earth around its solar ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The Physics Behind Contractions.
    ... By "In ecliptic orbit" I ... an Earth orbit in the ecliptic plane". ... you were talking about the earth-sun Lagrange points. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The Physics Behind Contractions.
    ... If a space telescope is sent into a circular ecliptic orbit and is accurately ... telescope spins on a similarly aligned axis once per its orbit period, ... image of that star will remain exactly in the viewing centre. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Hubble tug
    ... argument to salvage what's already in orbit. ... Not really germane to the replace v. upgrade question, ... I still conclude that there is cost savings from ... telescope was envisioned, a 2.4-meter telescope was a rarity, so the ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)