Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.

On Jan 2, 2:26 pm, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 03:48:45 -0800 (PST), Jerry <Cephalobus_alie...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:





On Jan 2, 3:55 am, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 00:54:37 -0800 (PST), Jerry <Cephalobus_alie...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 4:28 pm, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:

Let me explain again..... read carefully.
If a space telescope is sent into a circular ecliptic orbit and is accurately
aligned with a star that lies right on the ecliptic polar axis and if that
telescope spins on a similarly aligned axis once per its orbit period, the
image of that star will remain exactly in the viewing centre.

(sigh)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Your description of your proposal is ambiguous, but no matter how
it is interpreted, IT DOESN'T WORK.

You got it all wrong.
My telescope is actually orbiting the SUN not the Earth

You keep keep shifting your position, you weasel. How can anybody
discuss anything with you, when you keep altering your claims
and then LIE about your previous position?

Back in December, you EXPLICITLY DENIED that your proposal
involved solar orbit, but instead would work for a satellite in
Earth orbit.

On Thu, 25 Dec 2008, I pointed out:
  A satellite in ecliptic orbit around the Sun at one of
  Earth's stable Lagrangian points will still observe aberration.

to which you replied:
  Who said anything about Lagrangian points. By "In ecliptic orbit" I
meant "in
  an Earth orbit in the ecliptic plane". Do you understand now Crank?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/8736a4b9e99...

This will go on my lies list.

I JUST SAID IT CAN ALSO ROTATE AROUND THE EARTH IF YOU WANT IT TOO....BUT YOU
WILL HAVE TO ENSURE THAT IT IS AT HTE RIGHT PHASE WHEN YOU TAKE YOUR READNGS.

Besides which, your proposal STILL doesn't work for reasons that
both Paul and I have explained to you before, but which I will
put into a separate post so as not to clutter up this one.

Jerry
                     Henri Wilson's Lies
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/diploma.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/deception.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/rt_aurigae.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/history.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/snips.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/accuses.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/oh_dear.htm

Ah! I see you have now resorted to snipping the difficult stuff. That means I
have won the argument.

Nope. You've just been making a fool of yourself.

I see that Paul has beaten me to explaining why your proposal is
worthless for stars near the Ecliptic Poles.

Rather than repeat what Paul has to say, let me explain why your
proposal is worthless for stars away from the Poles.

Consider a star near (but not on) the ecliptic plane. Point your
telescope directly at the star.

-----
/ \
/ \
| |
| ---> *
| |
\ /
\ /
-----

Six months later, because you have been carefully rotating the
telescope axis in time with its orbit around the Sun, the scope
is pointed in the -opposite- direction from the star.

-----
/ \
/ \
| |
<--- | *
| |
\ /
\ /
-----

If you want to see that star again, you gotta turn that scope
around. (Note that I insisted that the star be -near- the
ecliptic plane, not on it. The Sun would otherwise get in the
way.)

-----
/ \
/ \
| |
---> | *
| |
\ /
\ /
-----

Bye, bye, carefully programmed rotation of the telescope axis!!!

Jerry

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: precession of mercury
    ... orbit in the ecliptic plane. ... However as long as the axis of precession of the ... Well, if the telescope does not spin on its own axis, the whole field of view ... Thus, relative star movement ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The Physics Behind Contractions.
    ... If a space telescope is sent into a circular ecliptic orbit and is accurately ... telescope spins on a similarly aligned axis once per its orbit period, ... image of that star will remain exactly in the viewing centre. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Hubble tug
    ... argument to salvage what's already in orbit. ... Not really germane to the replace v. upgrade question, ... I still conclude that there is cost savings from ... telescope was envisioned, a 2.4-meter telescope was a rarity, so the ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • International Team of Astronomers Finds Missing Link (Forwarded)
    ... National Research Council ... unusual orbit may help explain where comets come from. ... This discovery was made using the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope in Hawaii, ...
    (sci.space.news)
  • Re: The Physics Behind Contractions.
    ... If a space telescope is sent into a circular ecliptic orbit and is accurately ... telescope spins on a similarly aligned axis once per its orbit period, ... image of that star will remain exactly in the viewing centre. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)