Re: Galilean transformation equations
- From: PD <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:07:49 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 11, 6:41 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 11, 3:30 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 10, 6:53 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 10, 2:19 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 10, 10:03 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 10, 8:52 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 05:37:52 -0800 (PST), PD
<TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 9, 10:41 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
x'=x-vt
y'=y
z'=z
t'=t
Robert B. Winn
I imagine that must feel good somehow. I can't think of any other
reason you'd do it.
Let's see what happens when nobody responds to him.
I anticpate a new thread within 5 days of the last response.
I am way ahead of you, Eric. I started a new thread last night. What
I am hoping for is an unmolested post about the Galilean
transformation equations. If I can keep scientists occupied with this
thread, perhaps they will not molest the other one.
Robert B. Winn
Now why on earth, Robert, would you post something to a DISCUSSION
group if you don't want people discussing it, or as you call it,
molesting it?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Wonderful to learn you have changed your mind about discussing the
Galilean transformation equations, PD.
I didn't say I wanted to discuss them. I want to discuss why you would
post something to a discussion group while saying that you don't want
people to "molest" your post.
Let's discuss that.
Here are the Galilean
transformation equations:
x'=x-vt
y'=y
z'=z
t'=t
Go ahead and discuss them.
Robert B. Winn- Hide quoted text -
Right. Well, go ahead with your discussion.
Robert B. Winn
I already have. I asked a question. Normally in a discussion, when one
person asks a question, another person answers the question. Also
normally in a discussion, when one person makes a statement, it is not
presumed that the statement will be not be "molested" by other
comments.
Why do you make posts to a *discussion* group, Bobby, if you don't
want your posts "molested" by discussion?
PD
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Galilean transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation equations
- References:
- Galilean transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation equations
- From: eric gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation equations
- From: PD
- Re: Galilean transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation equations
- From: PD
- Re: Galilean transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- Galilean transformation equations
- Prev by Date: Re: GR time question
- Next by Date: Re: Evidences showing that time dilation does not exist: Universal definition of the second of atomic time
- Previous by thread: Re: Galilean transformation equations
- Next by thread: Re: Galilean transformation equations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
