Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: "Strich.9" <strich.9991@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:57:31 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 15, 2:47 pm, "Paul B. Andersen"
<paul.b.ander...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
snip
Paul,do you deny the diagonal movement of light in the moving
lightclock?
YES or NO?
(I know you are stupid and lazy, so now it is a simply true/false
question. Hopefully you can reply.)
(And this is relevant because the diagonal movement of light IS
aberration.)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Dr. Henri Wilson
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- References:
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Strich.9
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Strich.9
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: PD
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Strich.9
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Dr. Henri Wilson
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Strich.9
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Strich.9
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Strich.9
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Strich.9
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- Prev by Date: Re: GR time question
- Next by Date: Re: Test SPF4
- Previous by thread: Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- Next by thread: Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|