Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson)
- Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:59:54 GMT
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:16:04 -0800 (PST), kenseto <kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 16, 3:30 pm, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
Actually the vertical light beam remains vertical in the moving frame but moves
sideways as a whole. Light poles don't lean over no matter how fast you drive
past them.
The claimed diagonal movement is a major fallacy used by Einstein. The error
occurs because photons are wrongly regarded as tiny spheres.
Henry I agree. Vertical light beam remains vertical in the moving
frame
Right
as shown in the following link (page 1 and 2):
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/2008irt.dtg.pdf
That's why a cycle on a moving light clock takes longer time to
complete.
Wrong. There is no aether. It takes the same time in all frames.
assertion is not a valid arguement.
......says the master of assertion...
Ken seto
Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
......
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: kenseto
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: kenseto
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- References:
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Strich.9
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Strich.9
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Dr. Henri Wilson
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: kenseto
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: Dr. Henri Wilson
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- From: kenseto
- Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- Prev by Date: Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- Next by Date: Re: Galilean transformation equations
- Previous by thread: Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- Next by thread: Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|