Re: The Physics Behind 'Contractions'.

On Jan 20, 10:41 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 20, 7:36 pm, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:





On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:11:38 -0800 (PST), PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 18, 8:59 am, kenseto <kens...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 17, 5:59 pm, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:16:04 -0800 (PST), kenseto <kens...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 16, 3:30 pm, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:

Actually the vertical light beam remains vertical in the moving frame but moves
sideways as a whole. Light poles don't lean over no matter how fast you drive
past them.
The claimed diagonal movement is a major fallacy used by Einstein. The error
occurs because photons are wrongly regarded as tiny spheres.

Henry I agree. Vertical light beam remains vertical in the moving
frame

Right

as shown in the following link (page 1 and 2):
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/2008irt.dtg.pdf
That's why a cycle on a moving light clock takes longer time to
complete.

Wrong. There is no aether. It takes the same time in all frames..

assertion is not a valid arguement.

.....says the master of assertion...

I have a complete theory of physics with equations. Do you? Guess not.

Ken Seto

Gotta love Ken's style.
"My theory has equations. So yours isn't a theory and mine is. Nyah."

At least he tries....which is more than any member of the EPG is capable of
doing...

Well, you can root for the underdog if you wish, no matter how
incompetent the underdog. If you'd rather root than to try to point
out to the underdog how to become a little more competent, I'm sure
there's plenty room for you to do that. You go ahead and fulfill your
destiny in the peanut gallery.


ROTFLOL....this is PD's competency:
1. Directing the incoming light from a moving sodium source with a
toilet paper tube instead of a telescope to the grating to measure its
wavelength.
2. Observed closing velocity by the track observer will affect the
isotropy of the speed of light in the train and thus affecting the
simultaneity of events in the train. PD is not competent to know that
the train observer must make his own conclusion based on his won
measurements.
3. Insisted that from a fast moving muon at 0.99c will see a lab muon
decay at 20 us and claim that this has been comfirmed experimentally.

Ken Seto
3.


PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

.

Relevant Pages