Re: SR, frames, light and spatial separation

On Feb 2, 10:36 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 2, 9:35 am, "Strich.9" <strich.9...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Jan 27, 9:55 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jan 27, 8:06 pm, jonas.thornv...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Jan 27, 7:47 pm, Jim Newman <j...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

jonas.thornv...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 26 Jan, 16:12, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jan 26, 6:01 am, jonas.thornv...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

So Eric can two spatial separated objects constitute a frame in SR.

JT

*CAN* they? Sure. The whole planet Earth can be considered a frame if
you so choose.

I always thougt it did travel in an elliptic path around the sun and
thus was accelerated. Apparently i was wrong muhahaahahah

A frame can be non-inertial and still be a frame. I thought you knew that.

Well according to PD a frame could be the Aether too,

I didn't say the Aether, either. It doesn't have to be EITHER an
object OR the aether. Why do you think a frame has to be one or the
other?

no need for
object or observer you just imagine a point that need no place since
there is no absolulte space and this point is free to be moved
anywhere at once, to adjust the speed of light to c.

Go figure on that one for a while..........
And come back with a coherent definition for inertial frame.

None of you have any clue about what an inertial frame is, you only
keep on guessing from the dreamwork of Einstein.

A none inertial frame is quite useless for measuring the speed of
light, time dilation and length contraction,
*****i thought you knew that.*********

Because SRians always been invalidating accelerated frames for
comparisson of time dilation. That is the SRIANs main argument dealing
with anyone who asking them why objects orbiting around sun with
higher velocity than others do not experience any relative time
dilation to objects orbiting with lower velocities.

AND also you have the fact that an object at the earthpoles have a
relative lower speed than an object at the equator, and that clock
there should experience relative time dilation compared with clocks at
the poles.

But i thought you new that, or do you want to change your position so
we also can use accelerated frames to disprove SR fairy stories?

JT- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But you need an ether for light (the wave) to travel through.  Unless
you again invoke an exception to the rule...

What rule are you thinking of?
Is this similar to the rule that mammals all give live birth to their
young?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

First you diagnose your own condition, now you extend your BS into
biology? You are on a flight of ideas, Schizo-boy.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: My clock refuses to obey SRs time dilation!
    ... in one frame it has to travel more distance now for the ... > Except that I used a MASS instead of light to build my clock and the ... This is where you go wrong -- in the assumption the moving mass speeds ... My research determined that time dilation does ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: My clock refuses to obey SRs time dilation!
    ... in one frame it has to travel more distance now for the ... > Except that I used a MASS instead of light to build my clock and the ... This is where you go wrong -- in the assumption the moving mass speeds ... My research determined that time dilation does ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: My clock refuses to obey SRs time dilation!
    ... >> Except that I used a MASS instead of light to build my clock and the ... the frame of reference) predict the slowing of the clock due to mass ... The time dilation, the increase of mass, the reduction of the ruler just ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: My clock refuses to obey SRs time dilation!
    ... >> Except that I used a MASS instead of light to build my clock and the ... the frame of reference) predict the slowing of the clock due to mass ... The time dilation, the increase of mass, the reduction of the ruler just ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Distance-dependent time contraction
    ... >> as a frame of reference would move away from us, ... In this case, the observed, or measured time dilation could not be ... > I don't even look at your clock. ... while you will continue to observe my clock ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast