Re: how not to be a physics crackpot
- From: PD <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:50:47 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 6, 3:20 pm, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 04:15:20 -0800 (PST), Uncle Ben <b...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 6, 6:43 am, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:51:20 -0800 (PST), FLASH <flash.starwal...@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
http://www.phys.uu.nl/~thooft/theorist.html
Should I tell him that Einstein's theory is crap from start to finish or will I
let him work it out himself?
Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
.....
I suggest that you wait until your own Nobel Prize comes through.
Then you might have some credibility.
Only arch-conformists get prizes....the goodie-goodies...
This in the spirit of Crank Martyrdom. "Only the right are castigated.
That's how we know we're right."
And in "Henri's" case, it's his only metric, since he doesn't believe
in letting experimental evidence determine the answer.
.
- References:
- how not to be a physics crackpot
- From: FLASH
- Re: how not to be a physics crackpot
- From: Dr. Henri Wilson
- Re: how not to be a physics crackpot
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: how not to be a physics crackpot
- From: Dr. Henri Wilson
- how not to be a physics crackpot
- Prev by Date: Re: Proposal for an experiment to differentiate SRT from LET
- Next by Date: Re: Size is not Absolute.
- Previous by thread: Re: how not to be a physics crackpot
- Next by thread: Re: how not to be a physics crackpot
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|