Re: A new GToR?
- From: "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <dlzc1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:06:42 -0700
Dear Ken S. Tucker:
"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:df9473d7-8121-4c2e-aa19-419dd18f2416@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
GToR =General Theory of Relativty.
A null result of LIGO sofar, together with
the ambiguous result of GP-b, (which is
unlikely to be trusted however the numbers
are skewered) , requires a new GToR.
Horse manure. These were based on *approximations* to GR, not GR
itself. The tools we know how to apply, in ways that the
researrchers wanted to apply it, predicted the results not
obtained.
Gravitational waves are moving angular momentum out of binary
pulsar systems. LAGEOS did obtain frame dragging.
David A. Smith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A new GToR?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A new GToR?
- References:
- A new GToR?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- A new GToR?
- Prev by Date: Re: Fizeau Refutes SR.
- Next by Date: Re: Absolute Simultaneity. Why Wilson is Smarter than Einstein.
- Previous by thread: Re: A new GToR?
- Next by thread: Re: A new GToR?
- Index(es):
