Re: Einsteinian Relativity...all Bluff and Bull***

On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:52:11 -0800 (PST), PD <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 13, 2:46 pm, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:08:15 -0800 (PST), PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 13, 8:01 am, kenseto <kens...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 12, 1:50 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Experimental results show that a CHANGE in relative motion can affect
the speed between macroscopic objects

Yes, indeed, but the speed of macroscopic objects is not determined by
the laws of electrodynamics.

Crap. All speed are fram dependent by definition.

That's simply not right, Hank. You're repeating an error that's been
corrected already. Not all speeds are frame-dependent. All speeds are
relative. From this does NOT follow that all speeds are frame-
dependent, without an additional assumption. And that additional
assumption turns out to be experimentally, numerically incorrect, for
ALL speeds.

Anything that takes time to go from A to B has a speed.

Frames differ solely in respect of their relative speeds.

The speed of anything is therefore frame dependent.

PD



Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.

......
.

Quantcast