Re: Androcles's accusations of lying



On Feb 22, 8:28 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Jonathan Doolin" <good4us...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:5430bf3e-0fee-4e51-abe1-ba11b524f7a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 22, 7:08 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





"Uncle Ben" <b...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:d468166f-b279-4754-885d-a81b8208ff44@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

That is less important than the violence of Androcles's language in
denouncing me. His language is skirting the limits of permissible
discourse. In New York State, it is an offense called "menacing" to
threaten someone with bodily harm. Androcles may be safe across the
ocean, but he should be careful.

===============================================

Let me set your tiny mind at rest, dork.

"Beating the *** out of you" is a metaphor for defeating you in logical
debate, Uncle Bull***, and I have.

http://knowgramming.com/metaphors/metaphor_chapters/what_is_a_metapho...

No physical violence is intended or implied. I do not have the physical
capacity to engage in martial arts, having suffered various ailments not
of your concern, but they include an aortal aneurysm.
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/dci/images/aneurysm_aortic.jpg
You will probably gleefully outlive me.

This is a battle of wits, cretin, not one of violence, and for that
I give no quarter and I ask no quarter.

Androcles wins every battle of wits because he is his mind is an
impenetreble fortress.

=============================================
Androcles wins every battle of wits because the opposition is illogical
and in Uncle Bonehead's case because Bonehead lies and refuses to
address Einstein's illogical
 the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
the "time" each way is the same
as you do, running away like the coward you are.

Nature doesn't care about Einstein's theories, she has her own secrets
to hide. Discovering them is what science is about.
Androcles is a scientist, that's why he wins and you never will.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If admitting error means losing, and not admitting error means
winning, then yes. I lose quite frequently. If admitting ignorance
means losing, and not admitting ignorance means winning, then yes, I
will never win, and you always will. I graciously accept defeat.

However, the place where we disagree is that you believe that the
Special Theory of relativity does not make sense. Hence, when I say
that I understand the Special Theory of Relativity, you must believe
that I am a liar, because it is impossible to understand something
which does not make sense.

For instance, on an earlier thread, I posted this:

http://www.wiu.edu/users/jdd109/stuff/relativity/LT.html

and Androcles response was:

"F**king ignorant rubbish; time is not a vector, don't treat it as if
it were."

Again, Androcles was victorious, because I have absolutely no idea how
to respond.
.


Quantcast