sci.physics.relativity

• Date Index

---

• Bell's Theorem incorrect? The Debate, FLASH
• Re: Visual refutation of Special Relativity, G
  • Re: Visual refutation of Special Relativity, Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
    • Re: Visual refutation of Special Relativity, doug
• Did CNN get it wrong?, yuancur
  • Re: Did CNN get it wrong?, Androcles
  • Re: Did CNN get it wrong?, OG
• Einstein's Law., Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Eric Gisse
• Why was length defined in terms of the speed of light (c) and not vice versa?, countableinfinity
  • Re: Why was length defined in terms of the speed of light (c) and not vice versa?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: Why was length defined in terms of the speed of light (c) and not vice versa?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Why was length defined in terms of the speed of light (c) and not vice versa?, dlzc
      • Re: Why was length defined in terms of the speed of light (c) and not vice versa?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Why was length defined in terms of the speed of light (c) and not vice versa?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Why was length defined in terms of the speed of light (c) and not vice versa?, Dono
      • Re: Why was length defined in terms of the speed of light (c) and not vice versa?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why was length defined in terms of the speed of light (c) and not vice versa?, Dono
  • Re: Why was length defined in terms of the speed of light (c) and not vice versa?, PD
• In emission theory, WHY is light emitted at precisely c relative to the source?, Cephalobus_alienus
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • In emission theory, WHY is light emitted at precisely c relative to the source?, Cephalobus_alienus
  • In emission theory, WHY is light emitted at precisely c relative to the source?, Cephalobus_alienus
  • Re: In emission theory, WHY is light emitted at precisely c relative to the source?, Cephalobus_alienus
    • Re: Why, in crackpot theory, should Minor Crank continue to beat his mother?, Androcles
      • In emission theory, WHY is light emitted at precisely c relative to the source?, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: In emission theory, WHY is light emitted at precisely c relative to the source?, Androcles
    • Re: In emission theory, WHY is light emitted at precisely c relative to the source?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: In emission theory, WHY is light emitted at precisely c relative to the source?, Cephalobus_alienus
  • In emission theory, WHY is light emitted at precisely c relative to the source?, Cephalobus_alienus
  • Re: In emission theory, WHY is light emitted at precisely c relative to the source?, harry
    • Re: In emission theory, WHY is light emitted at precisely c relative to the source?, Androcles
• Re: ROCK SOLID PROOF THAT RELATIVITY IS CRAP!, Sue...
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ROCK SOLID PROOF THAT RELATIVITY IS CRAP!, Sue...
  • Re: ROCK SOLID PROOF THAT RELATIVITY IS CRAP!, Sue...
  • Re: ROCK SOLID PROOF THAT RELATIVITY IS CRAP!, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: ROCK SOLID PROOF THAT RELATIVITY IS CRAP!, PD
• Re: Strich failing to refute gravity probe A, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Strich failing to refute gravity probe A, doug
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Strich failing to refute gravity probe A, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: Strich failing to refute gravity probe A, Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", Einsteinhoax
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics", Einsteinhoax
• Re: Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof, shuba
• Questions regarding "second quantization," Yang-Mills, and QCD confinement, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Questions regarding "second quantization," Yang-Mills, and QCD confinement, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
  • Re: Questions regarding "second quantization," Yang-Mills, and QCD confinement, xxein1
  • Re: Questions regarding "second quantization," Yang-Mills, and QCD confinement, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Questions regarding "second quantization," Yang-Mills, and QCD confinement, Daryl McCullough
• SR's Basic Mistake., Henry Wilson, DSc
  • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Eric Gisse
    • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Henry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Dono
  • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Sue...
    • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., RP
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Sue...
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., RP
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Sue...
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., RP
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Sue...
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., harry
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., RP
    • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Henry Wilson, DSc
  • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., RP
    • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Henry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., harry
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Androcles
  • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., rbwinn
    • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Henry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Eric Gisse
    • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Eric Gisse
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., rbwinn
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Henry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Eric Gisse
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., rbwinn
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Eric Gisse
  • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Igor
    • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Androcles
  • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Henry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., RP
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Henry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., RP
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., RP
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Androcles
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Henry Wilson, DSc
      • Message not available
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., PD
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., G
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Androcles
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., PD
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., G
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Androcles
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., PD
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., G
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Androcles
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., PD
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., Henry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., PD
      • Re: SR's Basic Mistake., doug
• Relativity Predicts The Universe is Missing!!!, Fungi
  • Re: Relativity Predicts The Universe is Missing!!!, RP
• Relativity Predicts the Universe is Missing ???, cello
• The Atheist Apocalypse, michelnostradamus9@xxxxxxxxx
• Sigmoids. A new example of ZPE COSMIC ELECTRIC GENERATION between pairing black holes?, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Light cannot Enlight by Itself!, Cellulose
  • Re: Light cannot Enlight by Itself!, pmb
    • Re: Light cannot Enlight by Itself!, Cellulose
      • Re: Light cannot Enlight by Itself!, pmb
      • Re: Light cannot Enlight by Itself!, mesothorax
    • Re: Light cannot Enlight by Itself!, RP
      • Re: Light cannot Enlight by Itself!, pmb
      • Re: Light cannot Enlight by Itself!, RP
• Unified Field, Special Relativity, bkh99
  • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity, Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
      • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity, Cellulose
      • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity, Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
      • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity, Cellulose
      • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity, doug
      • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity, Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
    • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity, Josef Matz
      • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity, Androcles
    • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity, PD
      • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity, Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
  • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity, Androcles
  • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
  • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity, Sue...
• Iranian physicists work on warp drive?, FLASH
  • Re: Iranian physicists work on warp drive?, SolomonW
• Texas hold'em (2nd-P) NO-speed-of-light-LIMIT, Albertito
  • Re: Texas hold'em (2nd-P) NO-speed-of-light-LIMIT, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Texas hold'em (2nd-P) NO-speed-of-light-LIMIT, Albertito
      • Re: Texas hold'em (2nd-P) NO-speed-of-light-LIMIT, Androcles
      • Re: Texas hold'em (2nd-P) NO-speed-of-light-LIMIT, Eric Gisse
• Re: What have you discovered?, Uncle Ben
  • Re: What have you discovered?, Androcles
• Frank Wilczek's book Lightness of Being, FLASH
  • Re: Frank Wilczek's book Lightness of Being, Ace0f_5pades
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Frank Wilczek's book Lightness of Being, FLASH
    • Re: Frank Wilczek's book Lightness of Being, FLASH
• Relativistic Hydrogen molecules extract energy from Vacuum Flucuations, froarty572
  • Re: Relativistic Hydrogen molecules extract energy from Vacuum Flucuations, dlzc
• Relativity should be illegal, Norman Bates
  • Re: Relativity should be illegal, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
  • Re: Relativity should be illegal, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Relativity should be illegal, Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
  • Re: Relativity should be illegal, Androcles
  • Re: Relativity should be illegal, pmb
    • Re: Relativity should be illegal, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Relativity should be illegal, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: Relativity should be illegal, PD
      • Re: Relativity should be illegal, pmb
    • Re: Relativity should be illegal, YBM
    • Re: Relativity should be illegal, Androcles
      • Re: Relativity should be illegal, pmb
    • Re: Relativity should be illegal, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Relativity should be illegal, pmb
• Evolution of GR., Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Evolution of GR., Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
  • Re: Evolution of GR., Dono
  • Re: Evolution of GR., pmb
    • Re: Evolution of GR., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Tom Roberts
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Tom Roberts
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Juan R.
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Juan R.
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Juan R.
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Tom Roberts
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Juan R.
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Juan R.
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Juan R.
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Evolution of GR., koobee . wublee
      • Re: Evolution of GR., pmb
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: Evolution of GR., pmb
      • Re: Evolution of GR., Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Evolution of GR., Ken S. Tucker
• Question about black holes and neutron stars, Jimmy
  • Re: Question about black holes and neutron stars, dlzc
    • Re: Question about black holes and neutron stars, Jimmy
      • Re: Question about black holes and neutron stars, dlzc
  • Re: Question about black holes and neutron stars, Tom Roberts
• Re: .9 repeating, Uncle Ben
  • Re: .9 repeating, Androcles
    • Re: .9 repeating, Uncle Ben
      • Re: .9 repeating, Androcles
  • Re: .9 repeating, Androcles
    • Re: .9 repeating, Uncle Ben
      • Re: .9 repeating, Androcles
      • Re: .9 repeating, Uncle Ben
      • Re: .9 repeating, Androcles
      • Re: .9 repeating, Uncle Ben
      • Re: .9 repeating, Androcles
      • How many mathematicians ..., Uncle Ben
      • Re: How many mathematicians ..., Androcles
      • Re: How many mathematicians ..., Uncle Ben
      • Re: How many mathematicians ..., Androcles
      • Re: How many mathematicians ..., Uncle Ben
      • Re: How many mathematicians ..., Androcles
      • Re: How many mathematicians ..., Uncle Ben
      • Re: How many mathematicians ..., Androcles
      • Re: How many mathematicians ..., Uncle Ben
      • Re: How many mathematicians ..., Androcles
      • Re: How many mathematicians ..., Uncle Ben
      • Re: How many mathematicians ..., Androcles
      • Re: How many mathematicians ..., Uncle Ben
      • Re: How many mathematicians ..., Androcles
      • Re: How many mathematicians ..., Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Physics Website, aadi . physics
• How you can save fuel and the environment, Energy Saver
  • Re: How you can save fuel and the environment, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• The Race to the Asylum, Harry Wilson, DSc
  • Re: The Race to the Asylum, doug
  • Re: The Race to the Asylum, Shubee
    • Re: The Race to the Asylum, Harry Wilson, DSc
    • Re: The Race to the Asylum, Androcles
      • Re: The Race to the Asylum, Harry Wilson, DSc
  • Re: The Race to the Asylum, Dono
  • Re: The Race to the Asylum, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: The Race to the Asylum, Androcles
    • Re: The Race to the Asylum, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: The Race to the Asylum, Eric Gisse
      • Re: The Race to the Asylum, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: The Race to the Asylum, Eric Gisse
      • Re: The Race to the Asylum, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: The Race to the Asylum, Harry Wilson, DSc
• Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
  • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, RP
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Androcles
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, RP
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Darwin123
    • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, doug
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Darwin123
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Darwin123
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Stamenin
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Darwin123
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, PD
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, PD
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Androcles
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, doug
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Henry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, PD
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, PD
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, harry
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, harry
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, harry
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, PD
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, harry
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, harry
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Androcles
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Dorn Strich
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, harry
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Androcles
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, harry
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Androcles
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
  • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, RP
  • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, harry
    • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, harry
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, harry
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Androcles
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, harry
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, harry
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, harry
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Androcles
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Henry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, harry
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Androcles
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Henry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Henry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Androcles
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Androcles
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Darwin123
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
  • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, PD
    • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Darwin123
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Darwin123
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Henry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Darwin123
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Henry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Henry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Darwin123
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, PD
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, PD
      • Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?, Harry Wilson, DSc
• Why can we be sure that gravitational waves completely don't interact with vacuum?, dudajar
• Einstein is in Hell!!!, Snietsnie
  • Re: Einstein is in Hell!!!, Androcles
• Fresh "dicoveries" from Regress in Physics, Dono
• Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, Peter Riedt
  • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, Androcles
    • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, Peter Riedt
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, Androcles
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, Peter Riedt
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, Androcles
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, Peter Riedt
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, Peter Riedt
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, Androcles
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, Peter Riedt
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, Androcles
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, Peter Riedt
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, doug
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, Androcles
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, doug
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, doug
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, Peter Riedt
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, doug
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, Peter Riedt
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, doug
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, Peter Riedt
      • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, doug
  • Re: Riedt’s Anisotropic Light Formula, doug
• Re: When Cornered, Relativity shifts to New Mathematics, Papita
  • Re: When Cornered, Relativity shifts to New Mathematics, doug
    • Re: When Cornered, Relativity shifts to New Mathematics, Uncle Ben
      • Re: When Cornered, Relativity shifts to New Mathematics, Androcles
  • Re: When Cornered, Relativity shifts to New Mathematics, xray4abc
• Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
  • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Sue...
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Androcles
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Androcles
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Androcles
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Sue...
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Sue...
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Sue...
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Sue...
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Sue...
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Sue...
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Sue...
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Sue...
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
  • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, doug
  • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
    • Message not available
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Androcles
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Cellulose
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Androcles
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Cellulose
  • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, pmb
    • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
      • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Phil
    • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Sue...
  • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Sue...
  • Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, Sue...
• johnreed take 26 Part-4, Modified April 15, 2009, johnlawrencereedjr
  • Re: johnreed take 26 Part-4, Modified April 15, 2009, Androcles
• Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
  • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Uncle Ben
    • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Uncle Ben
      • Message not available
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, papa_rios
      • Message not available
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, papa_rios
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, tess
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, papa_rios
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, tess
      • Message not available
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, tess
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, tess
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Jim Black
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Jim Black
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Jim Black
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Math, The Friend of Relativity, Androcles
• antimatter and gravity: status?, funkenstein
  • Re: antimatter and gravity: status?, Eric Gisse
    • Re: antimatter and gravity: status?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: antimatter and gravity: status?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: antimatter and gravity: status?, dlzc
  • Re: antimatter and gravity: status?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: antimatter and gravity: status?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: antimatter and gravity: status?, pmb
    • Re: antimatter and gravity: status?, Tom Roberts
• RECORD OF NEGATIVE OBSERVATIONS ABOUT LORENTZ TRANSFORMATION, Stamenin
  • Re: RECORD OF NEGATIVE OBSERVATIONS ABOUT LORENTZ TRANSFORMATION, Sue...
    • Message not available
      • Re: RECORD OF NEGATIVE OBSERVATIONS ABOUT LORENTZ TRANSFORMATION, Sue...
    • Re: RECORD OF NEGATIVE OBSERVATIONS ABOUT LORENTZ TRANSFORMATION, Stamenin
  • Re: RECORD OF NEGATIVE OBSERVATIONS ABOUT LORENTZ TRANSFORMATION, Dono
• virtual ethnography of science cranks, b jones
• Should GRT be amended?, mluttgens
  • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Tom Roberts
    • Message not available
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Dono
    • Re: Should GRT be amended?, mluttgens
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Surfer
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Dono
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, mluttgens
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Dono
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, mluttgens
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Dono
      • Message not available
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Dono
      • Message not available
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Dono
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Dono
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Dono
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, mluttgens
    • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Jonathan Doolin
  • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Dono
  • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Jonathan Doolin
    • Re: Should GRT be amended?, Jonathan Doolin
• Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, blackhead
  • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, pmb
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, pmb
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, pmb
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, blackhead
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, blackhead
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, pmb
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, pmb
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, blackhead
      • Re: Jackson's derivation of the Lorentz Matrix, pmb
• DIRTY WATER, washing Feet - silent teachings of ZEN and Naqshbandi, baba
• Wang et all re sagnac & linear composition of velocities, Dead Paul
  • Re: Wang et all re sagnac & linear composition of velocities, Dono
    • Re: Wang et all re sagnac & linear composition of velocities, Dono
      • Re: Wang et all re sagnac & linear composition of velocities, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: Wang et all re sagnac & linear composition of velocities, Dono
  • Re: Wang et all re sagnac & linear composition of velocities, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Wang et all re sagnac & linear composition of velocities, Sue...
  • Re: Wang et all re sagnac & linear composition of velocities, Dead Paul
    • Re: Wang et all re sagnac & linear composition of velocities, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Wang et all re sagnac & linear composition of velocities, Dead Paul
      • Re: Wang et all re sagnac & linear composition of velocities, Sue...
• For a really good laugh..., Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: For a really good laugh..., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: For a really good laugh..., brentlmt
    • Re: For a really good laugh..., Androcles
      • Re: For a really good laugh..., brentlmt
      • Re: For a really good laugh..., Androcles
      • Re: For a really good laugh..., brentlmt
      • Re: For a really good laugh..., Androcles
      • Re: For a really good laugh..., brentlmt
      • Re: For a really good laugh..., Androcles
  • Re: For a really good laugh..., Dorn.Strich
    • Re: For a really good laugh..., doug
  • Re: For a really good laugh..., Dono
• Unified Field: Relative Momentum, bkh99
• Number of free parameters for the Lorentz group?, blackhead
  • Re: Number of free parameters for the Lorentz group?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Number of free parameters for the Lorentz group?, Jonathan Doolin
    • Re: Number of free parameters for the Lorentz group?, blackhead
  • Re: Number of free parameters for the Lorentz group?, Simple Simon
    • Re: Number of free parameters for the Lorentz group?, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Number of free parameters for the Lorentz group?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Number of free parameters for the Lorentz group?, Jonathan Doolin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Number of free parameters for the Lorentz group?, erg
• Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
  • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Androcles
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, harry
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, xxein1
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, doug
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, pmb
    • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, pmb
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, pmb
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, pmb
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, pmb
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
  • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, harry
    • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, harry
  • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Darwin123
    • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
  • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, PD
    • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, doug
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, doug
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, doug
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, doug
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, doug
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Sue...
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Sue...
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Sue...
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Sue...
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, shuba
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, PD
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, doug
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, doug
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, PD
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Phil
      • Re: Should evidence which ambiguously supports a concept be a concern for physics?, Jonathan Doolin
• Unified Field Theory: The Higgs Field, bkh99
• Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dead Paul
  • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Androcles
    • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dead Paul
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Androcles
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Androcles
  • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., pmb
  • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Tom Roberts
  • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dead Paul
    • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., PD
  • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., harry
    • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dead Paul
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., doug
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dead Paul
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., doug
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dead Paul
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., doug
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dead Paul
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., harry
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dead Paul
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., harry
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Tom Roberts
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Sue...
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., harry
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., doug
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Tom Roberts
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., PD
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dono
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., PD
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., PD
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dono
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Tom Roberts
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Sue...
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., harry
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dead Paul
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Sue...
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dead Paul
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dead Paul
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., harry
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dead Paul
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., harry
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., glird
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Androcles
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., PD
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Sue...
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., PD
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Sue...
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., PD
  • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Sue...
    • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dead Paul
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., pmb
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dead Paul
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Sue...
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dead Paul
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Sue...
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Dead Paul
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., Sue...
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., doug
      • Re: Einsteins 1905 paper flawed from the start., doug
• Why physicists don’t say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, socratus
  • Message not available
    • Re: Why physicists don’t say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, Dono
      • Re: Why physicists don't say: 'potential mass/energy E=Mc^2' ?, Josef Matz
      • Re: Why physicists don't say: 'potential mass/energy E=Mc^2' ?, Androcles
      • Re: Why physicists don't say: 'potential mass/energy E=Mc^2' ?, Josef Matz
  • Re: Why physicists don’t say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, pmb
• Question on the Ives and Stilwell experiment, xray4abc
  • Re: Question on the Ives and Stilwell experiment, Uncle Ben
    • Re: Question on the Ives and Stilwell experiment, xray4abc
      • Re: Question on the Ives and Stilwell experiment, Uncle Ben
      • Re: Question on the Ives and Stilwell experiment, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: Question on the Ives and Stilwell experiment, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: Question on the Ives and Stilwell experiment, xray4abc
      • Re: Question on the Ives and Stilwell experiment, Dono
      • Re: Question on the Ives and Stilwell experiment, xray4abc
      • Re: Question on the Ives and Stilwell experiment, Dono
  • Re: Question on the Ives and Stilwell experiment, Sue...
• Nike Shoes,Jordan Shoes are on sale in this online store, you can buy cheap Jordan Shoes here and we have new Air Jordan, nike shoes every weeks,Nike Air Jordan Shoes,Nike Shoes,Gucci Shoes,(www.lagogoing.com), three
• MMX proves Light anisotropic, Peter Riedt
  • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Tom Roberts
    • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Tom Roberts
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Androcles
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, doug
    • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Alfonso
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Androcles
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Sue...
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Alfonso
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Androcles
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Sue...
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Sue...
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Alfonso
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Androcles
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Tom Roberts
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, TickerBandit
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Bruce Richmond
    • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Max Keon
  • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Dono
  • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Eric Gisse
    • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Eric Gisse
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Dono
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, doug
  • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Androcles
    • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Androcles
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Androcles
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Androcles
  • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Cephalobus_alienus
    • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Androcles
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Dono
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Tom Roberts
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Dono
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Androcles
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: MMX proves Light isotropic, Androcles
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, doug
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Eric Gisse
      • Re: MMX proves Light isotropic, Androcles
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Tom Roberts
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, doug
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, doug
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, doug
  • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, harry
    • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, harry
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Androcles
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Dono
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Androcles
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Androcles
      • Re: MMX proves Light anisotropic, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX proves Light isotropic, Androcles
      • Re: MMX proves Light isotropic, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX proves Light isotropic, Androcles
• Re: The nuclear atom is illogical., shuba
• A Useful Website for Physics Researchers - MyNetResearch.com, Dr. Bay Arinze
• Re: ABOUT THE SPACE-TIME CONTINUUM, Sue...
  • Re: ABOUT THE SPACE-TIME CONTINUUM, Stamenin
    • Re: ABOUT THE SPACE-TIME CONTINUUM, Sue...
      • Re: ABOUT THE SPACE-TIME CONTINUUM, Stamenin
      • Re: ABOUT THE SPACE-TIME CONTINUUM, Sue...
• Old Data/New Model, ESKI
  • Re: Old Data/New Model, dlzc
    • Re: Old Data/New Model, ESKI
      • Re: Old Data/New Model, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Integrity and Credibility among Physicists, Jim Black
• Time dilation #2, bill
  • Re: Time dilation #2, Dono
    • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Dono
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Dono
  • Re: Time dilation #2, Sue...
    • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
  • Re: Time dilation #2, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Dono
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Dono
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Dono
  • Re: Time dilation #2, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, John Polasek
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation #2, John Polasek
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time dilation #2, John Polasek
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time dilation #2, John Polasek
      • Message not available
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time dilation #2, harry
      • Re: Time dilation #2, harry
      • Re: Time dilation #2, shuba
      • Re: Time dilation #2, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, harry
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, harry
      • Re: Time dilation #2, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Dono
    • Re: Time dilation #2, Sue...
  • Re: Time dilation #2, Sue...
  • Re: Time dilation #2, PD
    • Re: Time dilation #2, TickerBandit
    • Re: Time dilation #2, John Polasek
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Sue...
    • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, John Polasek
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, PD
      • Re: Time dilation #2, harry
      • Re: Time dilation #2, harry
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, PD
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, PD
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation #2, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Time dilation #2, PD
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time dilation #2, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time dilation #2, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time dilation #2, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, harry
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, harry
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, harry
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, harry
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, harry
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Dono
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation #2, Dono
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, PD
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, PD
      • Re: Time dilation #2, bill
      • Re: Time dilation #2, PD
• Re: Hyperbolic and Elliptic geodesics in 3D, gudi
  • Re: Hyperbolic and Elliptic geodesics in 3D, Androcles
    • Re: Hyperbolic and Elliptic geodesics in 3D, gudi
      • Re: Hyperbolic and Elliptic geodesics in 3D, Androcles
    • Re: Hyperbolic and Elliptic geodesics in 3D, gudi
• Re: geodesic parallels, gudi
• Re: Geodesics in elliptic, hyperbolic 3D geometries, gudi
• shoes,clothing,watches, caps,etc. (paypal payment), lili
• A Review of Classical and Quantum Electromagnetism in Integral Formulation, and a Possible Explanation of Certain Aspects of the Casimir Effect, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: A Review of Classical and Quantum Electromagnetism in Integral Formulation, and a Possible Explanation of Certain Aspects of the Casimir Effect, Darwin123
• Questions about Casimir effect, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Questions about Casimir effect, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Questions about Casimir effect, Sue...
• Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
  • Re: Is gravity relative?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Is gravity relative?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Is gravity relative?, Darwin123
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: Is gravity relative?, Sue...
    • Re: Is gravity relative?, Darwin123
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Sue...
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Sue...
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Androcles
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Sue...
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brad
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Androcles
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Sue...
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brad
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Androcles
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Androcles
  • Re: Is gravity relative?, pmb
    • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Androcles
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, PD
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, PD
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Androcles
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Androcles
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, carlip-nospam
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, dlzc
  • Re: Is gravity relative?, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Is gravity relative?, carlip-nospam
    • Re: Is gravity relative?, koobee . wublee
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
    • Re: Is gravity relative?, Sue...
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Androcles
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Androcles
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Androcles
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Sue...
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Sue...
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Sue...
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Dono
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Sue...
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brad
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Sue...
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Sue...
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Androcles
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, doug
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Is gravity relative?, Androcles
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, brentlmt
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Androcles
      • Re: Is gravity relative?, Henry Wilson, DSc
• The Unification of GRAVITY with RELATIVITY finally discovered ! !, warmbeach
• The Galilean Limit of EM (and Gauge Theory) Done Right (or: Correcting Levy-Leblond's Mistake), Rock Brentwood
• Universe expands into WHAT?, The Benutzer
  • Re: Universe expands into WHAT?, pmb
    • Re: Universe expands into WHAT?, The Benutzer
      • Re: Universe expands into WHAT?, pmb
  • Re: Universe expands into WHAT?, Jim Black
  • Re: Universe expands into WHAT?, PD
• Is Einstein a subset of Darwin?, Edon Benutzer
  • Re: Is Einstein a subset of Darwin?, warmbeach
  • Re: Is Einstein a subset of Darwin?, pmb
    • Re: Is Einstein a subset of Darwin?, The Benutzer
      • Re: Is Einstein a subset of Darwin?, pmb
  • Re: Is Einstein a subset of Darwin?, Jim Black
• Who is who ?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Who is who ?, Edon Benutzer
  • Re: Who is who ?, shuba
    • Re: Who is who ?, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: Who is who ?, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: Who is who ?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Who is who ?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Who is who ?, Eric Gisse
• Re: Why is Google Groups the most popular way to post ?, Don Stockbauer
  • Re: Why is Google Groups the most popular way to post ?, sal
• Why Space-Time does not predict The Simulation?, Edon Benutzer
• Why Big Bang is such a small Theory?, Edon Benutzer
• Back to Relativity, zarmewa
  • Re: Back to Relativity, Dono
  • Re: Back to Relativity, Danny
  • Re: Back to Relativity, sal
    • Re: Back to Relativity, Androcles
  • Re: Back to Relativity, Sue...
• Einstein elevator and the EEP, mluttgens
  • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, PD
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
  • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
    • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, mluttgens
  • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, brentlmt
    • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, PD
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, PD
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Edon Benutzer
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dono
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, brentlmt
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, brentlmt
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, brentlmt
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, brentlmt
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, brentlmt
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, betterboybob
  • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How is Gravity "acting at distance"???, PD
• Test your basic knowledge of physics during break from relativity., zarmewa
  • Re: Test your basic knowledge of physics during break from relativity., PD
  • Re: Test your basic knowledge of physics during break from relativity., Androcles
  • Re: Test your basic knowledge of physics during break from relativity., sal
• Re: Androcles's accusations of lying, Chris
  • Re: Androcles's accusations of lying, Jonathan Doolin
    • Re: Androcles's accusations of lying, Androcles
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Androcles's accusations of lying, Chris
• The need for Empirical Evidences, Edon Benutzer
• Instructor Solution Manual, markrainsun
• A new concept of flying. How can that be?, Yuriy
  • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, Yuriy
    • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, Yuriy
      • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, PD
      • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, PD
    • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, PD
    • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, Yuriy
    • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, Yuriy
• johnreed take 26 Part-4 on the Principle of Equivalence: Saturday, 28 March, 2009 - Summary, johnlawrencereedjr
  • Re: johnreed take 26 Part-4 on the Principle of Equivalence: Saturday, 28 March, 2009 - Summary, Androcles
• causality?, marcofuics
  • Re: causality?, Tom Roberts
• Where does the mass of the particle come from?, socratus
  • Re: Where does the mass of the particle come from?, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Where does the mass of the particle come from?, Edon Benutzer
• Simultaneity - Albert Einstein and the Theory of Relativity, zarmewa
  • Re: Simultaneity - Albert Einstein and the Theory of Relativity, dlzc
  • Re: Simultaneity - Albert Einstein and the Theory of Relativity, Uncle Ben
    • Re: Simultaneity - Albert Einstein and the Theory of Relativity, Androcles
    • Re: Simultaneity - Albert Einstein and the Theory of Relativity, Sue...
  • Re: Simultaneity - Albert Einstein and the Theory of Relativity, Androcles
    • Re: Simultaneity - Albert Einstein and the Theory of Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation - can't spot my error., John Kennaugh
  • Re: Time dilation - can't spot my error., Tom Roberts
    • Re: Time dilation - can't spot my error., John Kennaugh
      • Re: Time dilation - can't spot my error., Tom Roberts
  • Re: Time dilation - can't spot my error., harry
    • Re: Time dilation - can't spot my error., Androcles
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Time dilation - can't spot my error., kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Time dilation - can't spot my error., Androcles
• does light travel in 4 D, Chris
  • Re: does light travel in 4 D, Eric Gisse
  • Re: does light travel in 4 D, dlzc
• Post Deletions, Chris
  • Re: Post Deletions, Uncle Ben
    • Re: Post Deletions, Bob Remeaux
      • Re: Post Deletions, George Hammond
      • Re: Post Deletions, Bob Remeaux
  • Re: Post Deletions, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Post Deletions, dlzc
  • Re: Post Deletions, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: Post Deletions, PD
• hi, letsdobiz@xxxxxxxx
  • Re: hi, Bill Hobba
• Re: Time dilation, valls
  • Re: Time dilation, Dono
    • Re: Time dilation, valls
  • Re: Time dilation, Dono
    • Re: Time dilation, valls
      • Re: Time dilation, Dono
      • Re: Time dilation, valls
      • Re: Time dilation, Dono
      • Re: Time dilation, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time dilation, Dono
      • Re: Time dilation, Dono
      • Re: Time dilation, valls
      • Re: Time dilation, Dono
      • Re: Time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: Time dilation, Androcles
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Time dilation, harry
    • Re: Time dilation, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Time dilation, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation, harry
      • Re: Time dilation, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Time dilation, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation, harry
      • Re: Time dilation, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Time dilation, harry
      • Re: Time dilation, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Time dilation, harry
      • Re: Time dilation, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Time dilation, harry
      • Re: Time dilation, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Time dilation, shuba
      • Re: Time dilation, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation, harry
      • Re: Time dilation, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Time dilation, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation, Sue...
      • Re: Time dilation, harry
      • Re: Time dilation, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Time dilation, shuba
  • Re: Time dilation, harry
    • Re: Time dilation, bill
      • Re: Time dilation, harry
      • Re: Time dilation, bill
      • Re: Time dilation, bill
      • Re: Time dilation, harry
      • Re: Time dilation, valls
      • Re: Time dilation, Androcles
      • Re: Time dilation, valls
      • Re: Time dilation, Androcles
• Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, maxwell
  • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, harry
    • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, maxwell
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, doug
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, doug
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, harry
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, harry
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, harry
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, harry
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, harry
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, Sue...
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, harry
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, maxwell
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, harry
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, maxwell
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, harry
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, Androcles
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, maxwell
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, harry
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, Sue...
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, harry
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, harry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, maxwell
    • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, PD
    • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, Darwin123
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, maxwell
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, Darwin123
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, OG
    • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, harry
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, maxwell
      • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, harry
  • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, Cephalobus_alienus
  • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, pmb
    • Re: Evidence for Lorentz Contraction?, Androcles
• Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", maxwell
  • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", harry
    • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", sal
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Dono
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", xxein1
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", sal
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", xxein1
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Androcles
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", sal
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", harry
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Androcles
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", harry
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", mL
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", harry
    • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", maxwell
    • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", John Kennaugh
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", PD
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", harry
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", xxein1
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", harry
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", John Kennaugh
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Sue...
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", John Kennaugh
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Sue...
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", John Kennaugh
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Androcles
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", John Kennaugh
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Androcles
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", John Kennaugh
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Androcles
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", John Kennaugh
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Androcles
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", doug
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", harry
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", John Kennaugh
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", doug
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Eric Gisse
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", xxein1
  • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Bill Hobba
    • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", maxwell
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Bill Hobba
    • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", harry
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Bill Hobba
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", harry
  • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", pmb
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Ohanian describes "Einstein's Mistakes", Eric Gisse
• Einstein Notation confuse Gravity!, edon
• Re: Gauge Relativity Theory, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: Gauge Relativity Theory, Androcles
• Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Androcles
  • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Dorn.Strich
    • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, doug
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, pmb
    • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, dlzc
    • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, sal
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Androcles
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, maxwell
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, mluttgens
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Dono
  • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, harry
    • Message not available
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Androcles
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Androcles
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Dorn.Strich
    • Message not available
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, PD
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Dorn.Strich
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, PD
    • Message not available
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, sal
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, koobee . wublee
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, koobee . wublee
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Eric Gisse
    • Message not available
      • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: Anti-relativists and Judaism, edon
• mass definition, marcofuics
• Re: Can the theory of relativity be proved?, harry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Can the theory of relativity be proved?, harry
    • Re: Can the theory of relativity be proved?, Androcles
    • Re: Can the theory of relativity be proved?, pmb
      • Re: Can the theory of relativity be proved?, harry
• Re: Simple four velocity question, Jonathan Doolin
  • Re: Simple four velocity question, Androcles
  • Re: Simple four velocity question, PD
    • Re: Simple four velocity question, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, PD
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Androcles
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, PD
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, jem
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, jem
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, PD
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, jem
      • Message not available
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, jem
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, PD
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, jem
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, jem
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, jem
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Androcles
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, jem
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Androcles
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, jem
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Androcles
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, jem
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, PD
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Jonathan Doolin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Simple four velocity question, Jonathan Doolin
    • Re: Simple four velocity question, Androcles
  • Re: Simple four velocity question, Jonathan Doolin
    • Re: Simple four velocity question, jem
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, jem
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, jem
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, jem
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, jem
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, Jonathan Doolin
      • Re: Simple four velocity question, jem
• Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Bruce Richmond
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Dr. Henri Wilson
    • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Dr. Henri Wilson
      • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX, Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: De Broglie Relations expressed through rapidity, the greatest contribution to QM ever, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: De Broglie Relations expressed through rapidity, the greatest contribution to QM ever, Dono
    • Re: De Broglie Relations expressed through rapidity, the greatest contribution to QM ever, Ken S. Tucker
• Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Peter Riedt
  • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Dono
  • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, harry
    • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, harry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Peter Riedt
    • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, doug
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, doug
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Bruce Richmond
    • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, harry
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, harry
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Darwin123
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Darwin123
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Darwin123
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Bruce Richmond
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Darwin123
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Bruce Richmond
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, doug
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Darwin123
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Bruce Richmond
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Darwin123
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Bruce Richmond
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Androcles
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Darwin123
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Bruce Richmond
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Darwin123
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Sue...
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Bruce Richmond
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, doug
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Bruce Richmond
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Bruce Richmond
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Dono
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Dono
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Cephalobus_alienus
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Peter Riedt
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, harry
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Darwin123
      • Re: MMX, Rotation and Lorentz, Darwin123
• ABOUT THE EQUALITY OF THE INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL MASS, Stamenin
  • Re: ABOUT THE EQUALITY OF THE INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL MASS, Dono
  • Re: ABOUT THE EQUALITY OF THE INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL MASS, xxein1
    • Re: ABOUT THE EQUALITY OF THE INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL MASS, Stamenin
  • Re: ABOUT THE EQUALITY OF THE INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL MASS, Surfer
    • Re: ABOUT THE EQUALITY OF THE INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL MASS, Dono
  • Re: ABOUT THE EQUALITY OF THE INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL MASS, Sue...
    • Re: ABOUT THE EQUALITY OF THE INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL MASS, Stamenin
      • Re: ABOUT THE EQUALITY OF THE INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL MASS, Sue...
      • Re: ABOUT THE EQUALITY OF THE INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL MASS, Stamenin
• The Meaning of "Acceleration" in Curved Space-Time, instbio
  • Re: The Meaning of "Acceleration" in Curved Space-Time, pmb
• Re: galilean transformation equations, Androcles
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: galilean transformation equations, Stamenin
    • Re: galilean transformation equations, Androcles
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, YBM
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
  • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
    • Re: galilean transformation equations, harry
  • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
    • Re: galilean transformation equations, pmb
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
  • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
    • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Sue...
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, YBM
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, YBM
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, YBM
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, YBM
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, doug
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, YBM
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, doug
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, doug
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, doug
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, YBM
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, YBM
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, YBM
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, YBM
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, YBM
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, YBM
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, PD
      • Re: galilean transformation equations, Sue...
  • Galilean Transformation Equations, YBM
    • Re: Galilean Transformation Equations, Eric Gisse
  • Galilean Transformation Equations, YBM
    • Re: Galilean Transformation Equations, Darwin123
      • Re: Galilean Transformation Equations, xxein1
      • Re: Galilean Transformation Equations, Sue...
      • Re: Galilean Transformation Equations, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
    • Re: Galilean Transformation Equations, Richard Hachel
      • Re: Galilean Transformation Equations, rbwinn
      • Re: Galilean Transformation Equations, YBM
• Re: Wait oh! - you mean? (was A flawlessly-designed MMX...), despicabilityhoho
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Wait oh! - you mean? (was A flawlessly-designed MMX...), despicabilityhoho

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

sci.tech-archive.net  > Archive  > sci.physics.relativity  > 2009-04