Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP

On Apr 8, 11:36 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 8, 5:20 am, "Dorn.Strich" <strich.9...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On 8 Áðñ, 09:14, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 8, 4:55 am, mluttg...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On 8 avr, 14:43, mluttg...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On 7 avr, 17:18, Dono <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 7, 8:10 am, mluttg...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

As Vdm considers that a shift of 6.2 10^(-29) amounts
to zero,iow that the Einstein equivalence principle is
vindicated, he logically must also equal a distance of
5.5 * 10^-42 m to zero, and conclude that SRT is falsified!
But logic doesn't bother him overmuch!

Marcel Lattkes

Lattkes,

Some scientists took the trouble to verify EEP including the second
order effect:

B. Linet , P. Teyssandier, "Time transfer and frequency shift to the
order 1/c^4 in the field of an axisymmetric rotating body", Phys. Rev.
D, 66, 024045 (2002)

Now, scram, you have written enough imbecilities for 6 months.

Your buddy Vdm should have a look at your wonderful paperwww.savefile.com/files/2045250andexplainhowyougot
phi(e)^2 - phi(o)^2 from (phi(e)^2 - phi(o)^2).
His commentaries about your errors and simplifications are welcome.

Marcel Luttgens

Sorry for the typo:

Your buddy Vdm should have a look at your wonderful paperwww.savefile.com/files/2045250andexplainhowyou got
phi(e)^2 - phi(o)^2 from (phi(e)- phi(o))^2.

Are you seriously asking for him to move step by step through the
algebra?

Find a new hobby. Physics is clearly too difficult for you when you
can't even grasp simple algebra.

His commentaries about your errors and simplifications are welcome.

Marcel Luttgens- Áðüêñõøç êåéìÝíïõ óå ðáñÜèåóç -

- ÅìöÜíéóç êåéìÝíïõ óå ðáñÜèåóç -- Áðüêñõøç êåéìÝíïõ óå ðáñÜèåóç -

- ÅìöÜíéóç êåéìÝíïõ óå ðáñÜèåóç -

Find a new course. One that you can graduate on time with. Cooking
class perhaps?

Do you agree with Marcel's assertion that the algebra is wrong?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Do you agree that you need to find a new course?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP
    ... * 10^-42 m to zero, and conclude that SRT is falsified! ... can't even grasp simple algebra. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP
    ... he logically must also equal a distance of ... * 10^-42 m to zero, and conclude that SRT is falsified! ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP
    ... he logically must also equal a distance of ... * 10^-42 m to zero, and conclude that SRT is falsified! ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP
    ... * 10^-42 m to zero, and conclude that SRT is falsified! ... The idea is so stupid, and the proof is equally stupid. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Einstein elevator and the EEP
    ... * 10^-42 m to zero, and conclude that SRT is falsified! ... can't even grasp simple algebra. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)