Re: Evolution of GR.

On Apr 25, 9:50 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
Well, you're in good company. AE made the same mistake(s)
in 1911, with a 1/2 baked idea, so what, that's history,

Yes. With one ENORMOUS difference -- in the the next four years Einstein:
A) recognized his mistake
B) realized that it was based on his insufficient knowledge of math
C) found a friend to tutor him in the math he needed
D) used his new math skills to create a revolutionary new theory of
physics, GR

In more than twice that time, with history to guide him and excellent
textbooks on all the subjects involved, Ken has not even achieved (A).

Everybody makes mistakes; it how one responds to them and corrects them
that is the measure of a scientist.
Tom Roberts

I'm advised that only a dozen or so fella's on the
planet can understand GR, and those who cannot will
join the ranks of Juan/Tom (ilk) to become anti-GR.
I now think that's true.

I'll repeat, AE and his team tried to shoe-horn
SR into Newton, it failed miserably in AE's 1911,
defection of light. (I know alot about that).

In my OP, I introduced the concept of the relation
of the unified conservation of the Mass-Energy Law,
that was later to explain how that relates to the
relativity of acceleration, and then the expression
of M-E law in view of General Covariance, in stages.

After that, we can proceed to GR, EM and QT, but
you need to understand GR in stages, especially
the GPoR and then the ongoing evolution of GToR.

I'm rather appalled at the sight of the current
generation of GR theorists, trying to put GR into
a "nutshell", as if it can be mass-produced for
the unwashed masses.

Think of it this way, Apollo 11 used 5 stages to
return men from the moon, each based and consistent
with every other, and all coordinated.
GToR is like that.

I have made available some pablem (intro briefs)
at this site,
http://physics.trak4.com/
to show how the staging is basically done that
is the foundation of a new GToR, based on MST.
It's far from complete, but it sets forth an
attitude.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: inverse-square law through geometry
    ... On the math front, there was a time (first two years of undergraduate ... This incumbent received more votes *against* him than any in history. ... for the country and the world, but I feel vindicated in a lot of ways. ... > struggles between religious extremists is a valid as any other, ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: OT: US/Mexico wall would be "disgraceful" Fox
    ... I learned more other-peoiple's History than ours. ... Math is sort of a combination language and philosophy system. ... I'm just not a Union ... One of the reasons jobs are being transported out. ...
    (rec.motorcycles.dirt)
  • Re: The state of RAB
    ... I don't think the problem is RAB but Usenet in general. ... gossip about the math world in general, ... only in the history of math but the history of human thought in ...
    (rec.arts.books)
  • Re: A quest for two(irrational) numbers
    ... Those good in math. ... chemistry, history, whatever...). ... British history and was stuck. ... I was about to say the old punchline, ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)
  • Re: OT: US/Mexico wall would be "disgraceful" Fox
    ... >>Magna Carta - and that wasn't even MY American History, ... I'm afraid I also didn't care for/about the economic outcomes or ... >math is less sensitive to trends. ...
    (rec.motorcycles.dirt)