Re: Frank Wilczek's book Lightness of Being

On Apr 21, 1:09 pm, FLASH <flash.starwal...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The W, Z lepton & quark masses do not come directly from the SU3 color
condensate, but from the SU2 flavor condensate.http://www.fys.uio.no/forskning/drgrad/forskerskoler/irtg/Eigen/SM-3.pdfhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_mechanism
However, the latter may be a facet of the former.

Since the eight condensate strong tri-color force Goldstone phases
that give the emergent gravity tetrad & spin connection fields split
into 2 homogeneous Lorentz group 4-vectors, their two magnitudes (when
real) seem to be the degenerate vacuum manifold for the SU2 flavor
group of the weak force. The three internal rotations of SU2
correspond to 3 flavor condensate real vacuum order parameters with
two relative Goldstone phases.

Begin forwarded message:

From: JACK SARFATTI <sarfa...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: April 20, 2009 3:16:47 PM PDT
To: Sarfatti_Physics_Seminars
<Sarfatti_Physics_Semin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "SarfattiScienceSeminars@YahooGroups. com"
<SarfattiScienceSemin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Wilczek on Einstein's changing views on "aether" -
emergent gravity from QCD sigma condensate?

Look carefully at Tamara Davis's Figs 1.1 & 5.1 for large-scale
cosmological IR structure of universe.

Fig 1.1

Fig. 5.1

http://www.dark-cosmology.dk/press-releases/dark-cosmologist-returns-...

There are two simple geometrical constructions to note.

The hologram principle works for our spacelike separated event horizon
(intersection of thin blue horizontal "now" line with past light cone
of our future Omega Point.

i.e. Lp(t)* = (Lp^2L(t))^1/3   hologram equation

i.e. # hologram 2D pixels = # hologram image 3D voxels N

L(t)^2 ~ N(t)Lp^2

Lp*(t) = N(t)^1/6Lp

where L is square root of horizon area in this spacelike sense.

N(t) plotted in Fig 5.1

On the other hand,

 the present-day dark energy density ~ (area of horizon where our
future light cone intersects our event horizon)^-1

On Apr 20, 2009, at 1:54 PM, JACK SARFATTI wrote:

On Apr 20, 2009, at 12:22 PM, Paul Zielinski wrote:

"Vacuum", "ether", whatever you want to call it -- the point is that
inertia originates from an objective *local* interaction between
accelerating
masses and the physical vacuum. Gravity then alters the objective
conditions of inertial motion by acting on the same physical vacuum in
a manner
that can be described in terms of a 4D geometric model ("curved
spacetime").

Isn't that the whole point of the Higgs model for inertia?

RIP "Mach's principle"

Yes for the 19th century naive version - no for the 21 st century
retro-causal hologram version.

The more things change, the more they stay the same! Back to the
future!

More precisely

Back FROM the future.

----, 1973, "Regge Trajectories as Rotation Black Holes in Strong
Gravity", Collective Phenomena, H. Frohlich & F.W. Cummings, eds.
there were actually two papers there. In one I suggested a close
connection between the 8-fold way (hadronic physics back then) and
gravity. Very vague glimmer of today - a precognition remote viewing
in hindsight. Frohlich was very interested and invited me to
Liverpool. The idea was half-baked - too soon - no QCD et-al.

Higgs mechanism in QCD is origin of inertia, i.e. small rest masses of
leptons & quarks ~ 1 mev, supplemented by confined virtual gluon/quark
pair vacuum fluctuations to get to the 1Gev hadronic rest masses as
explained by Wilzcek.

But from Einstein & Wheeler's "Mass without mass" we also know that
inertia and gravity are also closely linked.

Remember, on a timelike geodesic in curved space-time (to a good
approximation) for the COM of a test particle - the inertia cancels
out!
That's part of the equivalence principle - no g-force on geodesics.

You only see inertia when a non-gravity force pushes the test particle
off-geodesic - g-force.

What we call (Newton's) "gravity force" is a misnomer - it's simply
the electrical reaction g-force in a static LNIF - when one exists
(outside event horizon).

How gravity emerges from the QCD color force.

The post-inflation sigma meson condensate, i.e. coherent macro-quantum
superpositions (Glauber states) of virtual off-mass-shell ? quark-
antiquark pairs has THE NINE (count them) real Higgs sigma field ODLRO
entangled-virtual quark-antiquark pair coherent order parameters!

(R1R2)   (R1G2)   (R1B2)

(G1R2)   (G1G2)   (B1G2)

(B1R2)   (G1B2)    (B1B2)

This is a 9-Dim degenerate vacuum manifold with my 8 Goldstone phases
inhttp://arxiv.org/abs/0902.0032

It has stable topological "brane" defects in a 9Dim spacelike
hypersurface consistent with the bosonic dimensions of superstring
theory.

Appropriate linear combinations of the above 9 matrix elements of the
order parameters must be taken to get the two Lorentz group 4-vectors
for the M-Matrix giving the emergent tetrads and spin-connections for
the gravitational field of curved spacetime (possible torsion as
well).

That's our universe in a nutshell. ;-)

JACK SARFATTI wrote:

"As the structure of the atom was patiently worked out in the
twentieth century, it became clear that the overwhelming majority of
the mass of atoms resides in a nucleus which makes up a minuscule
fraction of its volume, later that the nucleus is composed of protons
and neutrons, and still later that those particles were made up of
quarks and gluons, but still physicists were left with no explanation
for why these particles had the masses they did or, for that matter,
any mass at all. ...

In this compelling book, Nobel Physics laureate and extraordinarily
gifted writer Frank Wilczek describes how one of the greatest
intellectual edifices ever created by the human mind: the drably named
“standard model” of particle physics, combined with what is almost
certainly the largest scientific computation ever performed to date
(teraflop massively parallel computers running for several months on a
single problem), has finally produced a highly plausible explanation
for the origin of the mass of normal matter (ourselves and everything
we have observed in the universe), or at least about 95% of it—these
matters, and matter itself, always seems to have some more complexity
to tease out. ...

And what's the answer? Well, the origin of mass is the vacuum, and its
interaction with fields which fill all of the space in the universe.
The quantum vacuum is a highly dynamic medium, seething with
fluctuations and ephemeral virtual particles which come and go in
instants which make even the speed of present-day computers look like
geological time. The interaction of this vacuum with massless quarks
produces, through processes explained so lucidly here, around 95% of
the mass of the nucleus of atoms, and hence what you see when stepping
on the bathroom scale. Hey, if you aren't happy with that number, just
remember that 95% of it is just due to the boiling of the quantum
vacuum. Or, you could go on a diet.

...

everything we observe and the basis of all sciences from antiquity to
the present—makes up less than 5% of the total mass of the universe.
This discovery, and the conundrum of how the standard model can be
reconciled with the equally-tested yet entirely mathematically
incompatible theory of gravitation, general relativity, leads the
author into speculation on what may lie ahead, how what we presently
know (or think we know) may be a piece in a larger puzzle, and how
experimental tests expected within the next decade may provide clues
and open the door to these larger theories. All such speculation is
clearly labeled, but it is proffered in keeping with what he calls the
Jesuit Credo, “It is more blessed to ask forgiveness than permission.”

re:http://www.fourmilab.ch/fourmilog/archives/2009-03/001126.html

Puthoff's PV theory is not needed to explain the origin of inertia.
That is one of the implications of Wilczek's Nobel Prize.

The basic small rest mass of quarks comes via the Higgs mechanism from
the 8-parameter internal localized SU3 (x) anti-screening IR confined
UV free multi-colored (Jacob's Coat) macro-quantum coherent
superconducting post-inflation vacuum state with emergent gravityhttp://arxiv.org/abs/0902.0032
However, as mentioned above most of the ~ 1Gev hadronic rest mass
comes from the virtual quanta of the boiling vacuum.
What's wrong with Puthoff's model is that it uses only the U1(x) em
coupling and ignores the all-important SU3(x) coupling needed to
explain the actual hadronic jet data. Puthoff's model is simpler than
is possible.

Finding the free Higgs boson is not directly relevant to the above
because the basic coherent effect for the initial small quark rest
mass only involves macro-quantum superposition of off-mass-shell
virtual Higgs bosons not excited on-mass-shell outside the
superconducting vacuum.

How to have Puthoff's cake and eat it also! ;-)

PS With the tetrad formalism it seems to be easy to write U1xSU2xSU3
Feynman propagators in strong gravity fields as if they were still in
a fictitious Minkowski spacetime because

e^Iu(x) =  (constant) (4x4 identity matrix)^Iu + (variable) A^Iu(x)

is not perturbation theory, i.e. A^Iu(x) is not "small" relative to
first term on RHS.

A^Iu is the compensating spin 1 Lorentz group gauge potential from
localizing T4 spacetime displacement group.

A^Iu has a vacuum ODLRO macro-quantum c-number part + the micro-
quantum 2nd quantized creation/destruction piece

Search ResultsCalphysics Institute: Inertia Research
The Origin of Inertia. It is suggested that inertia is a
fundamental ... B. Haisch, A. Rueda and H. Puthoff published the
hypothesis that inertia may ...www.calphysics.org/inertia.html- 23k - Cached - Similar pages -
Calphysics Institute: Questions and Answers
Questions and Answers about the Origin of Inertia and the Zero-Point
Field .... Puthoffsuggested (as others had speculated previously as
well) that the ...www.calphysics.org/questions.html- 28k - Cached - Similar pages -
More results fromwww.calphysics.org»
Haisch-Puthoff SED ZPE origin of inertia violates Bohr-Rosenfeld ...
Haisch-Puthoff SED ZPE origin of inertia violates Bohr-Rosenfeld
Philosophy. ... The Haisch-Puthoff-Marshall ZPF SED origin of inertia
model violates the ...www.mombu.com/science/philosophy/t-haisch-puthoff-sed-zpe-origin-of-
inertia-violates-bohr-rosenfeld-1244795.html - 18k - Cached - Similar
pages -
sci.math: Brian Greene's Higgs Ocean and its implications for ...
Origin of Inertia is ~ MACRO QUANTUM COHERENT Higgs Field. not to the
RANDOM INCOHERENT transverse polarized virtual photons alone as
Haisch, Puthoff and ...
sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.math/2004-10/0482.html - 18k - Cached
- Similar pages -

.