Re: How many mathematicians ...
- From: "Androcles" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:25:52 +0100
"Uncle Ben" <ben@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:40d80617-79b7-4d0d-965c-33158da745a2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 23, 1:29 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Uncle Ben" <b...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:b1448358-3ddc-42ca-99c6-277cd68c3f7f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 23, 11:25 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:>
"Uncle Ben" <b...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3e6bd23a-c795-429b-9098-e53fcf219548@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 22, 11:39 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
1/7 = 0.\142857\ + h
If we multiply both sides by 7, we get
1 = 0.\999999\ + 7h
QED.
...
So,
1 = 0.\99999\ + 7h
and earlier
1 = 0.\99999\ + h
Subtracting,
0 = 6h
============================
h/7 < h and see lemma 1 (which you agreed was fine), h cannot
be divided by 7 before multiplying by 6.
What are you talking about?
Who is trying to divide h by 7?
Not me. I multiplied it by 7.
======================================
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You multiplied 1h by 7 and got 6h for the answer. Well done, Bonehead,
and thanks for the laugh!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
No, I didn't. 7h - h = 6h.
=========================
Yes you did.
6 * (h/7) -> 5.9\9\ * h but (h/7) is an illegal operation as per my fine
lemma.
What are you talking about, Not thee, thou multipliest by 7?
Try the memory test, it's fun, and you appear to have forgotten you rested
your case:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theoneshow/consumer/2009/04/20/how_sharp_is_your_memory_take.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How many mathematicians ...
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: How many mathematicians ...
- References:
- Re: .9 repeating
- From: Androcles
- Re: .9 repeating
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: .9 repeating
- From: Androcles
- Re: .9 repeating
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: .9 repeating
- From: Androcles
- Re: .9 repeating
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: .9 repeating
- From: Androcles
- How many mathematicians ...
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: How many mathematicians ...
- From: Androcles
- Re: How many mathematicians ...
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: How many mathematicians ...
- From: Androcles
- Re: How many mathematicians ...
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: How many mathematicians ...
- From: Androcles
- Re: How many mathematicians ...
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: How many mathematicians ...
- From: Androcles
- Re: How many mathematicians ...
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: .9 repeating
- Prev by Date: Re: How many mathematicians ...
- Next by Date: Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?
- Previous by thread: Re: How many mathematicians ...
- Next by thread: Re: How many mathematicians ...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|