Re: galilean transformation equations

On Apr 23, 7:02 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 23, 10:50 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 23, 3:52 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 22, 8:32 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 22, 6:05 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 22, 5:06 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 21, 7:44 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 21, 5:01 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 20, 9:54 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 20, 5:41 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 17, 9:06 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 17, 5:52 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 16, 6:25 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 16, 7:19 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 16, 3:55 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 15, 6:22 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 14, 6:16 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 14, 6:27 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 13, 10:14 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 13, 5:34 pm, PD <TheDraperFam....@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 13, 6:04 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 13, 6:15 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 12, 9:34 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 12, 6:05 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 12, 2:56 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Then what is Charles Darwin going backwards to, if he's dead?

He is going backwards toward whatever he put together for himself in
his mortal life. I would suspect that he is going backwards toward
his ideas about evolution..
Robert B. Winn

How does someone who is dead go backwards, Bobby?
Are you having difficulty connecting to reality?

PD

Do you think I am having difficulty connecting with reality? Why do
you think I am having difficulty connecting with reality.
Charles Darwin had no place to go when he died.

Except, according to you, backwards toward ideas.

Erasmus, his father,
had not gotten through to his son. Charles did not believe in God
even after listening to all of his father's preaching.

Whatever gave you that idea? Have you ever read a biography about
Darwin?

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I never have. I was never that interested in Darwin.

And that give you license to make up whatever you want about him, as
suits your whim?

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You seem to be claiming that I said something false about Charles
Darwin. What exactly was it you disagreed with?

You said that Charles did not believe in God. Wherever did you get
that idea?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I do not believe that Charles Darwin believed in God.

I think this was my point, Bobby. You believe what you want to
believe, even if you have to make up "facts" to support what you
believe. You do not seek to determine if what you believe is supported
by documented facts, and you are happy to stick with what you make up.
To you, this works fine, and it promotes your own happiness and
lifestyle.

However, scientists do not operate this way, and they find this way of
operating rather unfortunate and ill-advised.

You do not like how scientists operate. That's certainly your choice.

I do not like how scientists operate. Scientists refuse to discuss
the following equations simply because they discarded them a century
ago.

And they discarded them because of the other thing about how
scientists operate that you don't like -- reference to experimental
data. I understand that you just prefer to decide what you want to
believe, and make up "facts" to support what you want to believe. This
is going to continue to be the basic rift between you and scientists.

x'=x-vt
y'=y
z'=z
t'=t

They would rather impose a length contraction because it keeps them
in control of human thought

Do you think scientists are controlling your thoughts, Bobby?
Has anyone recommended medication to treat that?

Scientists are not controlling what I think. I do not believe what
scientists say.

I don't believe that scientists are controlling anybody's thoughts.
However, some people do believe what they say. It's possible, Bobby,
just possible, that those people believe what scientists say, and they
are right. You are free to believe what you want, but just because
they don't agree with you doesn't mean they're under mind control.

PD-

Well, of course, you are welcome to your own opinion, PD.

Is it your opinion that scientists are trying to control your
thoughts, Bobby?

Is it your opinion that people who don't agree with you are having
their thought controlled by scientists, Bobby?

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Scientists are trying to control the thoughts of all people, PD. That
is one of the goals of science. People in psychiatric science used to
give me a drug called thorazine because they were trying to control my
thoughts.

You don't suppose it had something to do with trying to remove the
delusion of scientists trying to control your thoughts?

I'm glad we're having this conversation, Bobby. I'm just trying to
determine much of a nutjob you are, exactly. I think anybody, and not
just psychiatrists, would do the same.

You spend hours and hours writing inane posts about
psychology in this newsgroup to me because you want me to stop using
the Galilean transformation equations.

I never said any such thing. Are you trying to tell me what I'm
thinking, Bobby? Doesn't that sound like what you think psychiatrists
were trying to do to you, Bobby? Don't you feel a little guilty acting
like a psychiatrist?

Why would I act, PD? Do you think that everyone is playing a part
because you are?

"Act" as in "behave in the manner of". You are what you do, Bobby.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh, that is right. You are upset because I posted the Galilean
transformation equations in sci.physics.relativity.

What on earth gives you the impression that anything you have ever
said would upset me? Are you making up stuff you want to believe
again?

PD-

Well, PD, you are obviously upset enough to try to influence me to
never post the Galilean transformation equations in
sci.physics.relativity.

I have told you several times, Bobby, that I have no intention of
influencing you to never post the Galilean transformations equations
again. I've told you that explicitly and in so many words. Somehow you
don't hear what people tell you. In fact, what I asked you is why you
think people care one way or the other whether you post Galilean
transformations. How you interpret that to mean that people are trying
to discourage you, is a mystery to me.

In fact, you seem to have dedicated your life
to this purpose. I do not think that a person who was not upset would
be posting after the manner of your posts for years.

I think you're mistaken. I'm highly amused by you. I make it a
persistent hobby to be amused by you. I know you don't intend to amuse
me, but you are highly amusing nevertheless. I don't know how you
could confuse amusement with being upset.

PD- Hide quoted text -

     Well, thank you for sharing, PD.

You're welcome, Bobby.
Is that what you say when you've decided that the contents of the
remarks are to be dispensed with, and replaced with your own thoughts
about what's going on?

PD

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: galilean transformation equations
    ... is going to continue to be the basic rift between you and scientists. ... It's possible, Bobby, ... they don't agree with you doesn't mean they're under mind control. ... the Galilean transformation equations. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: galilean transformation equations
    ... is going to continue to be the basic rift between you and scientists. ... It's possible, Bobby, ... they don't agree with you doesn't mean they're under mind control. ... the Galilean transformation equations. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: galilean transformation equations
    ... is going to continue to be the basic rift between you and scientists. ... It's possible, Bobby, ... they don't agree with you doesn't mean they're under mind control. ... the Galilean transformation equations. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: galilean transformation equations
    ... is going to continue to be the basic rift between you and scientists. ... It's possible, Bobby, ... they don't agree with you doesn't mean they're under mind control. ... Doesn't that sound like what you think psychiatrists ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Galilean transformation equations
    ... conceptual understanding of how things work. ... Galilean transformation equations after scientists have made their ... It was you who changed the subject, Bobby. ... I am still talking about the Galilean transformation equations. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)