Re: galilean transformation equations

On Apr 23, 7:01 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 23, 9:35 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Apr 23, 4:02 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 22, 8:40 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Well, why don't you decide, PD? You seem to believe that all of your
decisions should be made by other people.
Robert B. Winn

You don't want to acknowledge and affirm the things you've said
yourself? Are you not willing to stand by what you say?
I believe you've said
- that scientists are trying to control the thoughts of everybody
- that scientists are trying to keep other people, including welders
like you, from being employed
- that the United States has been corrupt since less than a decade
after the ratification of the Constitution
- that your posting Galilean transformations and making comments about
a subject you know nothing about upsets people.
Is this not what you said?

As for what the truth is, I've always found it's better to find a way
to determine what the facts are, rather than deciding what I want them
to be. From what you've said, you much prefer to just make the
decisions about what the truth is on your own, and to hell with facts.

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, you are certainly welcome to your own opinion, PD. Why is it so
important to you that I be the one who decides what your opinion is?
Robert B. Winn

What it is that you said is not a matter of opinion, Bobby. It's a
matter of documented fact. It's straightforward for you to consult the
back posts in the thread to see if in fact that is what you said, if
you cannot rely on your memory about what you said and what you think.

It's either what you think or it's not. It's not a matter of my
opinion or yours whether that's what you think. It's a matter of fact.

So either you said it IN FACT but did not mean it IN FACT and so you
were lying IN FACT, or you said it IN FACT and you meant it IN FACT.

What are the facts, Bobby? Or do facts not really matter to you one
way or the other?

PD-

Well, here, PD.  I posted these equations right here in
sci.physics.relativity.

                x'=x-vt
                y'=y
                z'=z
                t'=t

Robert B. Winn

Yes, and you also posted those other statements I cited.
I think together, they make quite a resume for you.

PD
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: time dilation
    ... Robert B. Winn ... scientists will be dependent on public revenues. ... exceptions like Galileo and Newton. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: time dilation
    ... Robert B. Winn ... scientists will be dependent on public revenues. ... scientists are in charge of putting out forest fires, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Galilean transformation equations
    ... the same velocity. ... Robert B. Winn ... I think you do have the ability to bore scientists until they walk ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Galilean transformation equations
    ... the same velocity. ... Robert B. Winn ... I think you do have the ability to bore scientists until they walk ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Galilean transformation equations
    ... the same velocity. ... Robert B. Winn ... I think you do have the ability to bore scientists until they walk ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)