Re: .9 repeating




"Uncle Ben" <ben@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d6385fe8-eb02-437d-8e52-d0e03dbb0e33@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Androcles, somebody is intercepting your posts and replacing them
with
things copied from your earlier posts. They are trying to make you
look like a spammer.


Thought you would want to know.


On March 6th 2009 Green uttered the following:

"Harry is right. And Androcles did indeed read Einstein's paper more
carefully than I did."
But Harry was confirming what Androcles had pointed out. The miserable
scumbag Green, instead of thanking Androcles for being shown Green's
error, decided to continue flaming Androcles; that makes the
hypocritical, arrogant, haughty and sanctimonious snob Green the
epitome of an internet troll and a prig, as previously established
by his ridiculous lectures on "closing speed" being different from
relative speed. His worthless paid-for degree has only served to weaken
his disgusting character.

You are a non-thinking fuckwit, Bonehead.

You failed the simple entrance exam. Do not post to any science newsgroup.

On March 7th 2009 Green uttered the following:

" 4. The speed of light is a constant c in any and all inertial frames.
About 4, we have it in Einstein's words in the derivation of the LT."

But we also have it in Einstein's words:

"Nun bewegt sich aber der Lichtstrahl relativ
zum Anfangspunkt von k im ruhenden System gemessen mit der
Geschwindigkeit V - v, so daß gilt: t = x'/(V-v)."

But we also have it in Einstein's words "if we assume" umpteen times.


SANITY WARNING (Bonehead Green)

On March 7th 2009
Bonehead Green claimed Einstein's first postulate: "relative motion"
implies that space and time is homogeneous and space is isotropic.

Einstein's 2nd postulate: "light is always propagated in empty space with
a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of
the emitting body" bears no resemblance whatsoever to Green's:
"Einstein's 2nd postulate of SR says that the speed of light is c in
every inertial frame."

Green makes no apology for misrepresenting Einstein, instead he
mumbles "I insist on using a modern form of the 2nd postulate."

Einstein himself says "Nun bewegt sich aber der Lichtstrahl relativ
zum Anfangspunkt von k im ruhenden System gemessen mit der
Geschwindigkeit V - v, so daß gilt: t = x'/(V-v)."

"But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k, when measured
in the stationary system, with the velocity c-v, so that t = x'/(c-v)."

Green cannot distinguish a postulate from a conclusion or realize
his assertion conflicts with Einstein's statement.

Green is guilty of lying and has lost all credibility by attempting to
excuse himself.
He is a cheat with zero integrity to be treated with contempt by all.
Even if what he says on other subjects were to be proven true he
cannot be trusted, one would always need to check the source for
verification or denial.

Green has been invited to sue for defamation of character but has
declined the offer to test the outcome. He has no defence.


.


Quantcast