Re: Experiment in Light-Space-Time Travel - Next Generation Michelson-Morley Experiment

... "equidistant" is the problem. Distance equates directly to c and
time... nd guess what, you get null MMX.

I know what you are saying..the basic rule from SR...but humor me with
this contraption..

Let ISP-A, ISP-B, ISP-C be the devices as Probes in Space, ISP for
Inter space Space Probe. The distances ISP-A, ISP-B, ISP-C are taking
different routes and at different points in Space, say around Sun, but
equidistant, and they start reading a Signal, from a common reference
Start Pulsar PS-C, C for Central. Without changing their inter-
distances, they adjust their distance from a Pulsar to be equal. The
Distance ISD-A-to-ISD-B and all the remaining 2 other sides of the
Equilateral are now equal distance from from the Pulsar PC-C and
perhaps this distance to PS-C is much much larger in scale. Their
position is calculated by current Inter Planetary Probes. They make
sure they are in clear line of sight.

Now they send the beam of light all the times to each other, in
synchronized fashion, based on the Pulsar PS-C Signal, and they being
collaborated with some sophisticated Distributed Computing and
Distributed Clock Synchrony Protocol (Distributed Clock is different
than Physical Clock but helps in synchronizing Distributed Counters to
decide which synchronized value of counter to act on which is based on
Pulsar PS-C Signals). For doing this over long duration, we can
account for all issues involving Motions around Central Galactic
Stars, Central Star Among Galaxies, Solar Storms, and other kind of IS
Disturbances.

They repeat modified MMX protocol, and around the clock for an year or
some longer period, and have different ISP-EI-A, ISP-EI-B, ISP-EI-C
Electric Interference Creators and ISP-MI-A, ISP-MI-B, ISP-MI-C,
Magnetic Interference Creators in the middle points of the distances
between ISP-A, ISP-B, ISP-C.

Now in this experiment, what would one expect with what all we know so
far, in the combination I mentioned, like EI and MI, and rotations.

What I feel, we would see some surprises than what we know of..


We know it can only behave one of three ways, and agree with the MMX.

Please pardon my ignorance, but what are the three ways? I was saying
the Space Field has this "vibration" which is complex and beyond 2d
and 3D..so how can one expect the Space-Time Fabric to be detecting a
delta based on Earth's Rotation vs the so called Ether (but I call it
Space).


The only work I am familiar with of Dr. Hau's involves light

From...

http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/1999/02.18/light.html

The stage is now set for slowing light. One laser is shot across the
width of the cloud of condensate. This controls the speed of a second
pulsed laser beam shot along the length of the cloud. The first laser
sets up a "quantum interference" such that the moving light beams of
the second laser interfere with each other. When everything is set up
just right, the light can be slowed by a factor of 20 million.

Does not apply here.

What I can say what I am doing.. I am shifting Energy from one Part to
another part..and that changes Space and Time around my Hands...or
Feet..and visibly to people they look of different Lenghts..even when
put together..where the fold marks once were at same spots and now
they are at 1CM apart...Docs and Phds Can not be fooled..

One can say I am somehow pumping more Blood and Mass.but how can I
increase the Bone and Vessels?

What I can say is that the underlying Space has changed, like a
Gravity Lensing effect..but here one 10-15 second Meditation does this
trick. So if my subtle Conscious Mind can bend that, around 1M Arm
Length, then how one can be sure that the Space in MMX is guaranteed
Homegoneousa nd Isotropic to rule out other parameters, and only
account for 3-D Space/Ether Wind Movement, which I feel again is
thinking that this Space Vibration or Movement in Additive in Axis of
Earth's Rotation but not in Transverse direction. What I feel is
that the Experiment is flawed because we assuming the "Grosser Earth"
to affect the "Subtle Space" in one direction only. I think it is like
saying the Gravitational Lens is going to only work in 1D in direction
of SPIN and the Transverse Direction Rays would not be bent by
Gravitional Lensing..

Yes, I am always learning, and open to learning, as well all should be
learning.. I need to read up all the updates on the URL you
pointed..and that would need time..

But this discussion would be useful to understand what others have to
say who have read the postings.

Sunil

On May 6, 3:25 pm, dlzc <dl...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Common World Inheritage Ambassador:

On May 6, 12:07 pm, Common World Inheritage Ambassador

<srivastava.su...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for your answer.

Such mechanism involves light, so will net a
null result, and you should realize.

Yes.  That is why I said some "hypothetical"
device which uses some out of band mechanism.
 Like three Inter Planetary Device in Space
which first throws light to an "equidistant

... "equidistant" is the problem.  Distance equates directly to c and
time... nd guess what, you get null MMX.



remote object (which is stationary and hard
to get,
...

Light is "EMF", and it does not in general
interact with other lgiht.

Yes.  What I meant Photons/Visiable Wavelength
EMF interacting with other Non Photonic EMF
Fields.

Checked.  No interaction.  they can control emission, but not
propagation / polarization.

...> > No.  No correlation, since MMX is essentially
a static test of light speed between different
orientations.  As to Sagnac, it is listed as
being in support of spacetime:

<snip link now broken by Google Groups.>



But depends on how you understand Aether (and
misunderstanding it to have a Vector like
Unidirectional Aether wind in 3D Space but may
be Omnidirectional in 3D) and Space may be
itself a field that we do not understand.

We know it can only behave one of three ways, and agree with the MMX.

I have an experiment where I modify Space -
in Flesh of Bones, Blood Vessals, Skin, Hand,
and Feet, Toes and Finger by 1 CM by a very
different principle but in agreement of GR.

Does not apply here.

Yes, this has been extensively studied.  The
light itself is unaffected by whatever EM
field you pass it through, as long as it
propagating through a vacuum.

In Lene Hau's experiment, they pass Transverse
Lasers as well to create some interference
pattern.  What is then that suppose to do?

The only work I am familiar with of Dr. Hau's involves light
propagation in supercold media.  Propagation in / through matter
involves (essentially) absorption and re-emission, to attain an index
of refraction of greater than unity.  So unless you are talking
vacuum, you are simply controlling allowable emission states.

David A. Smith

.

Relevant Pages