Re: Experiment in Light-Space-Time Travel - Next Generation Michelson-Morley Experiment

Dear Common World Inheritage Ambassador:

On May 6, 9:52 pm, Common World Inheritage Ambassador
<srivastava.su...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
... "equidistant" is the problem.  Distance
equates directly to c and time... nd guess
what, you get null MMX.

I know what you are saying..the basic rule
from SR...

No, this is how the meter is defined.

but humor me with this contraption..

Let ISP-A, ISP-B, ISP-C be the devices as
Probes in Space, ISP for Inter space Space
Probe.  The distances ISP-A, ISP-B, ISP-C
are taking different routes and at different
points in Space, say around Sun, but
equidistant, and they start reading a Signal,
from a common reference Start Pulsar PS-C,
C for Central.  Without changing their inter-
distances, they adjust their distance from a
Pulsar to be equal.

So they use light travelling through a space, to measure light
travelling through a space. Null result.

 The Distance ISD-A-to-ISD-B and all the
remaining 2 other sides of the Equilateral
are now equal distance from from the Pulsar
PC-C and perhaps this distance to PS-C is
much much larger in scale. Their position
is calculated by current Inter Planetary
Probes.

Using light travelling through this same space. Null result.

 They make sure they are in clear line of
sight.

Now they send the beam of light all the
times to each other, in synchronized
fashion, based on the Pulsar PS-C Signal,
and they being collaborated  with some
sophisticated Distributed Computing and
Distributed Clock Synchrony Protocol
(Distributed Clock is different than
Physical Clock but helps in synchronizing
Distributed Counters to decide which
synchronized value of counter to act on
which is based on Pulsar PS-C Signals).
 For doing this over long duration, we can
account for all issues involving Motions
around Central Galactic Stars, Central
Star Among Galaxies, Solar Storms, and
other kind of IS Disturbances.

They repeat modified MMX protocol, and
around the clock for an year or some
longer period, and have different ISP-EI-A,
ISP-EI-B, ISP-EI-C Electric Interference
 Creators and ISP-MI-A, ISP-MI-B, ISP-MI-C,
Magnetic Interference Creators in the middle
points of the distances between ISP-A, ISP-B,
ISP-C.

Doesn't matter. The fundamentals of the experiment, from either no-
aether or Lorentz aether, *must* yield a null result. You are using
light to establish length, and then using light to measure "change in
length".

Now in this experiment, what would one
expect with what all we know so far, in the
combination I mentioned, like EI and MI, and
rotations.

Null result *must* be obtained, with noise / uncertainty impressed by
the various contraptions.

What I feel, we would see some surprises than
what we know of..

Think again.

We know it can only behave one of three ways,
and agree with the MMX.

Please pardon my ignorance, but what are the
three ways?

1) No aether (SR and GR)
2) Lorentz aether (SR + the Earth propagates through the aether "just
like" light does)
3) a dragged aether (obviated by other experiments)

 I was saying the Space Field has this
"vibration" which is complex and beyond 2d
and 3D..so how can one expect the Space-Time
Fabric to be detecting a delta based on
Earth's Rotation vs the so called Ether (but
I call it Space).

Nature doesn't care what mental models we construct to "stand in" for
Reality. She will gladly break our legs or kill us if we guess
wrong. She provides "symptoms" that we can measure, and it is up to
use to diagnose the "disease" (underlying "physic" to quote xxein).

The only work I am familiar with of Dr. Hau's
involves light

From...

http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/1999/02.18/light.html

The stage is now set for slowing light. One laser
is shot across the width of the cloud of condensate.

Condensate is matter. Light passing through it at less than c is
*propagating* at the local rules of the medium, the "stuff".

....
Does not apply here.

What I can say what I am doing.. I am shifting
Energy from one Part to another part..

And I have precognitive dreams. It is not dpulicable by other
experimenters. It has nothing to do with MMX. Please keep your eye
on the ball. If you want to do Kirlian photography and such, there
are other newsgroups for this, populated by those that have an
appreciation for such esoteric subjects.

You are wasting your energy trying to push string.

David A. Smith
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
    ... Citation for aether theories that did account for MMX, ... Because Relativists constantly need to reinvent strawmen in order to dismiss ... >> positron before Dirac postulated their existence? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: MMX and Zeno
    ... >> overtake a target moving at a slower speed, ... >> Here we have a parallel with MMX. ... >> A and mirror B at the end of the parallel ... The source, the mirror, and "distance AB" (which is ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX
    ... In physics, one can never measure anything precisely, so we put errorbars on measured values. ... So it is true that the MMX did not have what one could call a "null result". ... Maxwell's wave in aether theory didn't. ... The belief in Maxwell's theory was so strong that it was assumed that both a/ and b/ are true and that the MMX showed that for some unexplained reason an observer is always stationary w.r.t the aether. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX
    ... null result of the MMX as the MMX predates relativity. ... Maxwell's wave in aether theory didn't. ... Two theories of light dominated physics. ... Propagates', or 'Light travels'. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Quick and earnest question about MMX
    ... null  result of the MMX as the MMX predates relativity. ... hear your prediction about who would win the game they watched on TV ... Maxwell's wave in aether theory didn't. ... Physics thought it had all the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)