# Re: Only two possible transformations: lorentz and galilei.

*From*: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Fri, 8 May 2009 16:04:36 -0700 (PDT)

On May 8, 6:21 pm, "Harlequin" <phillosopher.st...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

wrote:

http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node108.htmlSo fill the space between London and Stockholm with near-fields

and wire some of the prize money to your friends, faster than

light. :-)

Sue...

You surely can come up with better arguments than resorting to silly

sarcasm.

One argument is sufficient if it is effective and

I believe that one was. It not silly because I

offered it, The papers are silly because they allude

to the possibility.

There might be something very interesting to learn in discussing

this research.

The papers don't merit an argument because they

are based on misunderstandings. If two labs

performing the experiments produced different

results due to relative motion between the

labs, that would be a violation of the principle

of relativity.

Indeed there is something interesting to learn

about what *appers* to be an anomaly in the

experiments. But the effects are as old as

structures that match to the impedance of

free space and there is no shortage of reading

material on the subject.

Theory Near-Field and Far-Field

--Joachim Johansson and Urban Lundgren

http://www.sm.luth.se/~urban/master/Theory/3.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_reactance

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evanescent_wave

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunneling

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_constant

Sue...

.

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Only two possible transformations: lorentz and galilei.***From:*Harlequin

**References**:**Only two possible transformations: lorentz and galilei.***From:*lundslaktare

**Re: Only two possible transformations: lorentz and galilei.***From:*Sue...

**Re: Only two possible transformations: lorentz and galilei.***From:*Harlequin

**Re: Only two possible transformations: lorentz and galilei.***From:*Sue...

**Re: Only two possible transformations: lorentz and galilei.***From:*Harlequin

**Re: Only two possible transformations: lorentz and galilei.***From:*Sue...

**Re: Only two possible transformations: lorentz and galilei.***From:*Harlequin

**Re: Only two possible transformations: lorentz and galilei.***From:*Sue...

**Re: Only two possible transformations: lorentz and galilei.***From:*Harlequin

**Re: Only two possible transformations: lorentz and galilei.***From:*Sue...

**Re: Only two possible transformations: lorentz and galilei.***From:*Harlequin

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?** - Next by Date:
**Re: Why Don't Einsteinians Search for their Aether?** - Previous by thread:
**Re: Only two possible transformations: lorentz and galilei.** - Next by thread:
**Re: Only two possible transformations: lorentz and galilei.** - Index(es):