Re: Only two possible transformations: lorentz and galilei.

On May 8, 6:21 pm, "Harlequin" <>
So fill the space between London and Stockholm with near-fields
and wire some of the prize money to your friends, faster than
light. :-)


You surely can come up with better arguments than resorting to silly

One argument is sufficient if it is effective and
I believe that one was. It not silly because I
offered it, The papers are silly because they allude
to the possibility.

There might be something very interesting to learn in discussing
this research.

The papers don't merit an argument because they
are based on misunderstandings. If two labs
performing the experiments produced different
results due to relative motion between the
labs, that would be a violation of the principle
of relativity.

Indeed there is something interesting to learn
about what *appers* to be an anomaly in the
experiments. But the effects are as old as
structures that match to the impedance of
free space and there is no shortage of reading
material on the subject.

Theory Near-Field and Far-Field
--Joachim Johansson and Urban Lundgren



Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Global Warming new spin
    ... over an area of science. ... Graduate students have written papers long before the 2000s. ... if only the famous people with established labs can publish ...
  • Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
    ... > He has yet to explain why his 'relative motion' always takes place in the ... > vertical direction. ... Reading his papers doesn't make it any clearer, ... horizontal direction of the light rays is different in different locations ...
  • Re: Anisotropy of space / Shnoll et al. results...
    ... Some papers are available on the arxiv, ... In fact they DID compare the experiments with (standard) theory: ... the hypothesis accordin to which the received alpha particles ... this looks like something thousands of labs are already set ...