Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- From: "Juan R." González-Álvarez <juanREMOVE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:10:51 +0000 (UTC)
Ken S. Tucker wrote on Fri, 22 May 2009 14:57:33 -0700:
Juan you are a charlatan.
Ken you are a pretender.
--
http://www.canonicalscience.org/
Usenet Guidelines:
http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/miscellaneouszone/guidelines.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- References:
- g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- From: Juan R.
- Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- From: Juan R.
- Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- From: Juan R.
- Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- From: Juan R.
- Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- From: Juan R.
- Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- Prev by Date: Re: Coupling intrinsic quantum spin to the classical kinematics of a particle
- Next by Date: Re: Curvature of spacetime
- Previous by thread: Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- Next by thread: Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv
- Index(es):
