Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv

On May 23, 8:45 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 23, 7:20 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On May 22, 6:10 pm, "Juan R." González-Álvarez

<juanREM...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ken S. Tucker wrote on Fri, 22 May 2009 14:57:33 -0700:

Juan you are a charlatan.

Ken you are a pretender.

Thanks Juan, for your input to the Group,
you are excused, I can take it from here.
Ken

Donk on donk violence is a poker term which describes two clueless
poker players going at it with eachother with overall bad preflop and
postflop play.

On one hand, we have Ken who knows absolutely nothing about general
relativity but makes up for it with stubborn idiocy and baseless
personality attacks [still can't show how I plagarize, Ken?]. On the
other we have Juan R. who is significantly more educated but is
completely crippled by his tunnel vision regarding his pet theories
and ideas, who couldn't concede a point or argue honestly if his life
depended on it.

Hard to say who the favorite is here.

Your idiot reponses are more useless than Juan's.
In my books, you Eric and Juan are a pair of
fucking idiots, who have no clue about the way
GR has evolved in the last 30 years, pardon my
language but that's the truth.

GPoR now forms the foundation of Quantum Theory,
and EXPLAINS the Coulomb force strength effects
between charged particles.
I personally checked that, and independantly
verified those claims...for me it's simple stuff.

You people should stop wasting time, and if able,
use your mind and time to embrace this grand
universe.
Follow the "Unitious Fusion" process I posted to
formulate Unitivity, from Weyl, Einstein and Kaluza,
as a start, and figure it out for yourselves.

The math is simple, even for a pair of clowns
like Juan and Eric!!
Solve this,

S dS = X dX and S /\S = X /\X

permits a continuum and a quantized solution.

Next, the metricity of dS uses R_abcd =/=0,
but the metricity of dX uses R_abcd =0, with
an ACTION connection.

Have a look at Eq.(4)
http://physics.trak4.com/GR_Charge_Couple.pdf

and write it this way,
S^2 = X^2 + h , h = a*b ,
smooth as silk, see the Action connection, "h",
in accord with the EFE's.

Here's what QFT needs, Modern SpaceTime
http://physics.trak4.com/
Eliminates the imaginary "i", with a mere
transformation...back to reality.

The equations I find most useful, and set-forth,
predict a null result from both LIGO and GP-b,
experiments differing from classical GR predictions,
and are experimentally verified, as C-Dyn published
prior to the experimental results.

Nice stuff eh?
Ken S. Tucker




































Regards
Ken S. Tucker




.

Quantcast