Re: g_uv = \eta_uv + h_uv

On May 24, 9:36 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 23, 8:35 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On May 23, 7:29 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On May 23, 5:00 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Well, since GP-B didn't null and binary systems decay exactly as if
gravitational radiation were real, and given the independent
confirmation of Frame Dragging in the LAGEOS I/II spacecraft

We've taken a $BILLION of taxpayer money and we
failed to confirm "FD" or "g-waves".

Uhhh, what?
http://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/status1.html

NONCONCLUSIVE, as NASA concluded.

Uhhhh, NO. Not even close to inconclusive.

Read the fucking page.


As for LIGO, we'll keep plugging at it till it works.

We had a visual Gamma Ray Burst go off, and LIGO
remained silent, get objective.

So?

What is the expected frequency and amplitude of the signal of such a
source and why? Was the source within the sensitivity of the detector?
What if our models for GRBs are wrong?

That last one had a nice paper on the subject published.


(Personally, I'm disappointed by the results
of GP-b and LIGO so far, but Mother Nature
doesn't give a rat's ass about my feelings,
I do the science as icy cold as possible, and
reported the results).

*Look again, there could be an alligator under
your bed*.
The null results of GP-b and LIGO are software
errors in understanding GToR, those effects are
imaginary artifacts, but those null experiments
confirm the upgrading of GToR.
Even with direct observation of frame dragging and indirect
observation of gravitational waves

In the BUSINESS of science, those are "intermittent"
observations, (something Eric knows nothing about),
like seeing a face on Mars.

Really? Intermittent you say?

There have been all of 3 missions that could have tested for frame
dragging.

LAGEOS I - confirmed to ~20%.
LAGEOS II - confirmed to ~10%
GP-B - confirmed to ~10%, subject to further analysis.

REAL science requires reproducability, to eliminate
spurious, noisy inputs, and subjectivity.

Classical GToR was superseded (obsoleted) 30
years ago, we now have proof.

 ONWARD =====> NEW & IMPROVED.
 Ken S. Tucker

.

Quantcast