Re: Lorentz Contraction for the even dumber
- From: Dono <sa_ge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 17, 8:57 am, rotchm <rot...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There is nothing really wrong in what Ben wrote... just perahps not
explained as well as one would expect.
The x'=0, t=0, x=0 defines a unique event and,
x'=L, t=0 selects another event.
Another one who doesn't know what an event is either.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lorentz Contraction for the even dumber
- From: Whoever
- Re: Lorentz Contraction for the even dumber
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Lorentz Contraction for the even dumber
- From: rotchm
- Re: Lorentz Contraction for the even dumber
- References:
- Lorentz Contraction for the even dumber
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: Lorentz Contraction for the even dumber
- From: Dono
- Re: Lorentz Contraction for the even dumber
- From: rotchm
- Lorentz Contraction for the even dumber
- Prev by Date: Re: Einstein's Train Gedanken Re-visited
- Next by Date: Re: Lorentz Contraction for the even dumber
- Previous by thread: Re: Lorentz Contraction for the even dumber
- Next by thread: Re: Lorentz Contraction for the even dumber
- Index(es):