Re: Basis of SR?
- From: "Spirit of Truth" <juneharton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:02:18 -0700
"Tom Roberts" <tjroberts137@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:COt%l.772$lv5.492@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Spirit of Truth wrote:
If this is where it comes from [...]It doesn't. SR "comes from" a combination of the work of Lorentz,
Poincaré, and Einstein around the turn of the last century (a few others
contributed in lesser amounts). The MMX is NOT AT ALL the only
experimental support for SR -- see this link to learn how outrageously
wrong that notion is:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html
As I wrote elsewhere I'll examine later experiments later.
Certainly not at that time, and I will examine them in order. Right now MMX
was incorrect. Lorentz + MMX was not correct, and in 1905 Einstein
incorrectly determined from them SR, and used Lorentz math to justify it..
Do you deny this?
Spirit of Truth
While the MMX itself does not refute all other theories, the COMBINATION
of all those experiments does indeed refute all other theories, except for
those that are experimentally indistinguishable from SR (within its domain
of applicability).
Tom Roberts
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Basis of SR?
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: Basis of SR?
- From: Whoever
- Re: Basis of SR?
- References:
- Basis of SR?
- From: Spirit of Truth
- Re: Basis of SR?
- From: Spirit of Truth
- Re: Basis of SR?
- From: Tom Roberts
- Basis of SR?
- Prev by Date: Re: Basis of SR?
- Next by Date: Re: michelson morley experiment questions
- Previous by thread: Re: Basis of SR?
- Next by thread: Re: Basis of SR?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|