Re: Basis of SR?

"Spirit of Truth" <juneharton@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:5BE%l.299$Dx2.120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Whoever" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:005aede5$0$9706$c3e8da3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Spirit of Truth" <juneharton@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:W7E%l.294$Dx2.162@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Tom Roberts" <tjroberts137@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:COt%l.772$lv5.492@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Spirit of Truth wrote:
If this is where it comes from [...]
It doesn't. SR "comes from" a combination of the work of Lorentz, Poincaré, and Einstein around the turn of the last century (a few others contributed in lesser amounts). The MMX is NOT AT ALL the only experimental support for SR -- see this link to learn how outrageously wrong that notion is:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html

As I wrote elsewhere I'll examine later experiments later.

Certainly not at that time

Doesn't matter. The theory came from postulates .. it explained experiments that had been made .. it made predictions that were later support experimentally. That is why it has gain acceptance as a theory (though always open to the possiblity of being refuted)

and I will examine them in order. Right now MMX
was incorrect.

No

Lorentz + MMX was not correct

No

and in 1905 Einstein
incorrectly determined from them SR,

No

and used Lorentz math to justify it..

No

Do you deny this?

Yes .. gee that was easy.

Well, you are incorrect in all your denials.

No .. I'm not.

The burden of proof is on you, as you are make outrageous claims against well supported theories and experiments. So far nothing from you to support your claims. So I'll deny your claims as they are incorrect.

Unless you can come up with something substantial, all they we need to do is deny your unsupported claims.

I'll see if you have anything worth responding to.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Soda, defintely OT
    ... Pointing out that Jack's incorrect - well, ... human rights or the civil rights of unpopular minorities is ... Look at the policies you support here at home, ... together a coherent position in which the various parts ...
    (rec.pets.dogs.behavior)
  • Re: VHDL syntax
    ... incorrect. ... I have an issue with a synthesiser and I'm not entirely sure of the ... response I recevied from the vendor's support team. ... Two other synthesisers (inc. Synplify) don't flag this as an error. ...
    (comp.lang.vhdl)
  • Re: Event 201 "no license was available" error message
    ... the registry setting for the number of licenses for ... MSExchangeIS is set to an incorrect value.NOTE: ... call Microsoft Technical Support for assistance. ... >> According to this article the number of licenses for MSExhangeIS is ...
    (microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz)
  • Re: MS Word and "Fortran"
    ... Support the Original G95 Project: http://www.g95.org ... Support the GNU GFortran Project: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html ... -- Henry Ford ... Yup...that is now incorrect. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Getting g_wszVBRQuality property
    ... The error code is just like if the parameter type is ... I don't think you can say it is a bug for g_wszVBRQuality because the call ... not that its type is incorrect. ... You can call MS Customer Support in your country if you think it's a bug. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsmedia.sdk)