Re: Clear writing about relativity

Mike <eleatis@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
56e85372-5def-4e1d-af54-f9c6cf22592e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 27, 11:23 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip]

Is this plot of tau against t linear? No.
Does x'/(c-v) = x'/(c+v) ? No.
Does tau[x'/(c-v)] = tau[x'/(c-v)]? No.
Does 1/2 tau[x'/(c-v) + x'/(c-v)] = tau[x'/(c-v)]? No.


Hi Androcles. I haven't been around for a long time because there are
cranks like Dirt of the Motel around. However, you are wrong on this
one.

The linearity is a property of the TRANFORMATION equations. If you
look at the tranformation equations for each point they are linear.
Tau as a function of t, or vice versa, need not, and should not be
linear because we are talking about a trajectory now, not a
transformation from one point to another. Your graph shows the
evolution of time t as a function of tau, or vice versa.

Think of it this way: Each point in K transforms linearly to a point
in k at each infinitesimally small instant of time. There is the
continuouus linear transformation taking place.


AS I have said before, do not try to find any problems in the math of
SR. You are just setting up starwman arguments and red herrings and
make it easy for cranks like Dirt Van de Brothel ridicule you and along
with you all sane people

All sane people like you, that is?
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Search/searchresult.html?sw=eleatis


opposed to the SR crap.

The problems of SR are deeply philosophical to the extend that no
scientist in the right mind can accept this theory in the context of
scientific realism but use it only in an instrumentalist sense. SR is
not even approximately a true description of how physical reality
operates but of course many people do not care as long as it does the
job for the moment. This is an indication though, according to the
Pessimistic Meta-Inducation principle, that it will be falsified,
sooner than later.

There has to be an absolute reference frame, it will only take time to
discover it. The new Galileo will be the person that will send SR, GR
and similar crap to the waste basket and all the books about them for
re-cycling and toilet paper production. Just realize what cosmological
conatnt GR predicts and what observations measure. These theories have
been already falsified but the establishment will fight it the same
way they fought Galileo. SR and GR are no more than religinos that
have long collapsed on their face. They survive only because of
reasons unrelated to science.

So long,

Mike

Imbecile.
Even Androfart will eat you alive over this drool.

Dirk Vdm
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Clear writing about relativity
    ... cranks like Dirt of the Motel around. ... look at the tranformation equations for each point they are linear. ... way they fought Galileo. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Simple Sagnac
    ... The only reply from you I've seen on the topic of Sagnac ... There is a train on the track of length x', ... those are the equations of transformation between coordinate ... it certainly is a linear transformation. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The Present.
    ... | Sorcerer wrote: ... |> "Given that the equations are linear", which they are not, the lying ... The Galilean transformation is correct when it comes to the y and z ... performing the transformations in three directions at once, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
    ... that "The Mapping Postulate and the Homogeneity postulate imply that the ... the transformation would not be one-to-one everywhere." ... delta-t are linear functions of delta-x' and delta-t'. ... other expressions involving x' and t. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Linear Algebra question: newbie
    ... This is not a direct MATLAB question but I am trying to use a C++ ... I have a linear algebra question that might be embarassingly trivial ... I have a linear transformation matrix that maps output pixel indices to ...
    (comp.soft-sys.matlab)