Re: Did Lorentz himself believe in the Lorentz Transform. ?
- From: Uncle Ben <ben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 28, 3:44 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
snip
If you took a course in kiddy algebra you'd fail it,
Uncle Bonehead Green Jr., stupid, stubborn, arrogant ignoramus, or SSAI.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, John, and I appreciate
it. (See end of the post above yours.)
Actually, I would get to the corner drugstore instantly, not never,
as
you say. Since clocks stop and length contracts, I would get there
before you could say "Androcles is a fool."
About your length dilation, I have finally come to the conclusioon,
not that you equated the wrong times, and not that you don't know
about principal axes of ellipses expressed as quadratic equations.
It
is just that you can't keep straight which frame has the primes and
which frame has naked variables.
I'm sorry to see you decline so rapidly, John. Soon you will have to
live in restraints to protect yourself and others, and you won't be
able to continue amusing us with your eccentric views, except for the
time that your handlers can find to let you loose under close
supervision to peck away at your computer keyboard.
Uncle Bonehead
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Clear writing about relativity
- Next by Date: Re: Clear writing about relativity
- Previous by thread: "Causality"
- Next by thread: AND NOW, THE KING OF POP BELONGS TO THE AGES !
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
