Re: Clear writing about relativity

On Jul 1, 1:07 am, doug <x...@xxxxxx> wrote:
mpc755 wrote:
On Jul 1, 12:39 am, doug <x...@xxxxxx> wrote:

Emitter theory has been shown to be wrong so you are just being
silly to follow it.

Of course you do not read the rest of the post.

There is no science content in what you are saying. You are just spewing
ignorant handwaving as you have on all your other "theories". You have
no idea what science is about or what it consists of.

Emitter theory has not been shown to be false. It has been shown that
light does not travel at c+v and c-v which my version of emitter
theory also supports.

Yes, your emitter theory has been shown to be false. Rational
people would look for something else to do.


No, it has not been shown to be false and in fact explains Einstein's
Train Thought Experiment where all of the lightning strikes are
determined to occur at the same time.

Light propagates outward from the source at 'c'.

You have no idea what a frame of reference is so you have no
ability to make any comments about them.

I am discussing something beyond frames of reference. Light is not
tied to any frame of reference. It propagates outward from a source at
'c'. When the light reaches its destination it has traveled from the
source to the destination at 'c'. It has traveled from where the
source *is* to where the destination *is*.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Hamiltons Rule is Xenos Paradox ( was Re: Underestimating
    ... > appropriate to science, ... I simply argue that any rational proposition must have a frame of reference ... > been caged so as to rule out preference. ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: transformation equations
    ... reference S' moving at v in x axis relative to frame of reference S (as ... anything can travel, and then have objects a and b moving in opposite ... special relativity that will actually work? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Zero Time Conundrum
    ... have rest mass do NOT travel at c ... then we'd see it stopped from out frame of reference. ... reference) see time in a frame of reference in which the photon is at rest. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Zero Time Conundrum
    ... have rest mass do NOT travel at c ... If it were possible to put a massless clock on a photon, and observe it, ... then we'd see it stopped from out frame of reference. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Zero Time Conundrum
    ... have rest mass do NOT travel at c ... then we'd see it stopped from out frame of reference. ... reference) see time in a frame of reference in which the photon is at rest. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast