Re: Androcles "mixem up his frades"
- From: Mike <eleatis@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 30, 10:46 pm, Uncle Ben <b...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John Parker, "Androcles",' has finally given us enough information to
be able to diagnosis his ridiculous assertion -- that Einstein in his
initial SR paper of 1905 derived a formula expressing the dilation of
a rigid rod's length because of its motion.
[snip to save abndwidth]
Adrobot is a freaking idiot and I do not expect him to understand what
you seem to also miss but may be able to understand.
STOP CONSIDERING 3-D OBjECTS IN RELATIVITY. YOU WILL GET INTO
CONTRADICTIONS. RELATIVITY HAS ONLY 4-D OBJECTS. THERE ARE NOT 3-D
OBJECTS IN RELATIVITY. ALL OBJECTS RELATIVITY COMMITS TO HAVE SPATIAL
AS WELL AS TEMPORAL PARTS.
When you understand the above you will understand a few things:
(1) Androbot is an ignorant crank
(2) You do not understand relativity
(3) Relativity is harder than you thought
Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Androcles "mixem up his frades"
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: Androcles "mixem up his frades"
- References:
- Androcles "mixem up his frades"
- From: Uncle Ben
- Androcles "mixem up his frades"
- Prev by Date: Re: De Sitter false premise in double star experiment
- Next by Date: Re: De Sitter false premise in double star experiment
- Previous by thread: Re: Androcles "mixem up his frades"
- Next by thread: Re: Androcles "mixem up his frades"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|