Re: Train gedanken pitfall
- From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 22:16:42 +0200
kk <mr_kurt_kingston@xxxxxxxxx> aka Brian D. Jones, "CAD designer with expertise in Special Relativity"
and former reviewer of http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/info.htm
aka Dark Energy,
aka Forumodus of Halicarnassus,
aka TymBuk2, aka Cadwgan Gedrych, aka 2ndPostulateDude,
aka SRdude, aka Edward Travis, aka Ron Aikas, aka Roy Royce, aka John Reid, aka Martin Miller
aka Wings of Truth
aka delta-T
wrote in message
17c5fd6c-a2c6-446b-9ba9-c81db34caef5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 1, "Whoever" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:"kk" <mr_kurt_kings...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
[snip a load of crap]
SR did not momentously do away with absolute time.
There is no such thing in SR. So yes, it did.
Thought what makes you think there is such a thing
as absolute time in the first place is a mystery
That absolute time exists is easily proved by the two simple
facts that people in different inertial frames age differently,
and each person ages uniquely.
GASP!
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/ProofAbsoluteTime.html
Dirk Vdm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Train gedanken pitfall
- From: kk
- Re: Train gedanken pitfall
- References:
- Re: Train gedanken pitfall
- From: Whoever
- Re: Train gedanken pitfall
- From: kk
- Re: Train gedanken pitfall
- Prev by Date: Comments on Special Relativity (17 June 2009)
- Next by Date: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
- Previous by thread: Re: Train gedanken pitfall
- Next by thread: Re: Train gedanken pitfall
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|