Re: I am Trying To Learn Relativity

On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:56:06 GMT, 2+2=5 <two@.....> wrote:

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 07:27:11 -0700 (PDT), PD wrote:

On Jul 6, 11:27 pm, 2+2=5 <two@.....> wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 19:32:49 -0700 (PDT), Rock Brentwood wrote:


Logical except for your last claim. I don't see the connection.

Then perhaps you need to try to stop absorbing this material from
usenet and read something that takes things at a more leisurely pace
to explain.

I have been reading plenty of other articles about Einstein's theory and
none makes any sense to me. That's why I am trying to find a few answers
here.

You'll never make any sense of it because it is nonsense from start to finish.

What you get from usenet is going to automatically be a condensation
which will be hard to follow unless you are already familiar with the
subject matter.

I'm beginning to think I already know more about it than anyone here.
None of you can engage in an intelligent discussion. You keep repeating the
same old stuff.

Diaper is a moron and a member of the Einsteinian papal guard.
He has never contributed anything scientific here. Plonk him now or he will
waste a lot of your time and tell you nothing..



I don't see that this has anything to do with light speed.

I understand. That's because you're still back on square one, while
he's moved on to square 12.

I doubt if you can understand a word of it.

he cannot.


But you're looking for an explanation in the wrong place. It's like
trying to learn Arab culture by watching Fox News. If you really want
to understand relativity, then you will invest in a few good resources
that will provide more answers. If you don't want to invest in any
resources, then you're going to have to accept the fact that your
level of understanding of the subject will always be poor and at the
layperson, gee-whiz level.

If you know so much, tell me this. If two people are moving at different
speeds past a light source that emits a light flash when they are both next
to it, why should it appear to move spherically away from both of them?

Let's see if you can actually talk science rather than just preach
religion.

He cannot. Light is ballistic. It doesn't appear as a sphere in both their
frames as Einstein claimed.
The flash moves spherically away from the source at c wrt the source.


Henry Wilson...www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

.........putting Physics back into Phairyland...
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: I am Trying To Learn Relativity
    ... then you will invest in a few good resources ... If you don't want to invest in any ... layperson, gee-whiz level. ... speeds past a light source that emits a light flash when they are both next ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Sockets, writing data and shutdownOutput
    ... low defects) is produced before launching some library API into the big bad world. ... The only solution to this is to invest more time and resources in PREVENTING such bugs creeping in in the first place... ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: Thoughts on JPM Natural Resources Fund?
    ... fund - maybe invest it in a self-select ISA and pick some individual ... I invested in JPM Nat Resources a couple of years ago on the basis ... the environment e.g. who invests in wind turbines or mass heat ...
    (uk.finance)
  • Re: C++ pushback
    ... invest your effort where you feel it will do the most good, ... criticize others for doing the same with their own resources. ... Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth ...
    (Linux-Kernel)