Re: A To E must cover the boundary between physics and metaphysics.

On Aug 10, 2:22 pm, mpc755 <mpc...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 10, 3:16 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Aug 10, 2:14 pm, mpc755 <mpc...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Aug 10, 3:05 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You haven't defined what "scientific" or what "scientific explanation"
means to you.
All you do is sprinkle "not scientific" as a label on things you don't
believe.

But you can't explain the meaning of your label, and it isn't
documented anywhere you can point to.

What does "scientific" mean to you?
By what rule do you recognize when something is scientific and when it
is not?

Can't do it, can you?
Can't admit it to yourself, even, can you?
The more you ignore it, the more you look like an idiot.
You must not mind looking like an idiot, or you must be used to it.

I have been asking you to explain how the future dictates the past for
weeks now.

You've asked for a scientific explanation for weeks now. I asked you
what YOU mean by "scientific explanation" for weeks now. You have
refused to answer that question for weeks now.

You demand people to answer questions involving terms you haven't
defined and refuse to define. And what do you hope to accomplish by
repetition of that nonsense?

.

Relevant Pages