Re: "The Einstein Hoax"

"BradGuth" <bradguth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:d0871c21-fd76-4163-b105-9d33a55d90ba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 23, 4:32 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
"BradGuth" <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:ad20f1d9-c78e-41dc-a309-1b271188d850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



> On Aug 23, 7:56 am, "Enilno" <eni...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> "The Einstein Hoax"

>> (See also our sister website reticsessays.com)

>> The Einstein Hoax was written to counter an intellectual "fast
>> shuffle"
>> which used Dr. Einstein's Special Relativity (which is easily seen to >> be
>> a
>> mathematical copy of the earlier Lorentz Transformations Aether >> Theory)
>> to
>> propagate the idea that our physical reality was too subtle to be
>> understood
>> by mortal men and could only be dealt with using sophisticated
>> mathematics.
>> This ploy served the academic community very well. The quote was made
>> that
>> Dr. Einstein's principle contribution was not Special Relativity but
>> rather
>> the showing that mathematics could used to make advances in the >> physical
>> sciences and "it was no longer necessary to wait for "the few great >> minds
>> that arise in each century" to make progress. Since the availability >> of
>> such
>> intelligent men could not be expanded but mathematics can be taught to
>> anyone, the approach not only made the physical sciences more >> mysterious,
>> but allowed an unlimited expansion of the contributing scientific
>> community.

>> The phenomena associated with both Special and General Relativity
>> seem,
>> to a large degree, to be incomprehensible and the conclusions
>> contradictory.
>> There is a simple reason for this. The explanations which are provided
>> lead
>> the mind to recognize inherent contradictions which are not apparent >> in
>> the
>> mathematics. Since the contradictions do not appear in the mathematics >> it
>> was considered obvious that did not exist! These contradictions have >> led
>> to
>> the continuous confusion appearing in the Newsgroups and elsewhere. >> The
>> reality is that, when an expert(s) cannot explain his(their) knowledge >> to
>> an
>> intelligent layman (laymen), there can only be one explanation. The
>> expert(s) do not actually understand their subject matter. IT IS NOT
>> BECAUSE
>> OF THE LIMITATIONJS OF THE LAYMEN.

>> "The Einstein Hoax",http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm, was written >> to
>> provide an understanding of our physical reality which is in agreement
>> with
>> all known physical observations and mathematical logic and , most
>> importantly, pass the "intelligent layman" test. The chapters of "The
>> Einstein Hoax" are listed below:

>> Chapter Titles

>> 1. - Introduction
>> 2. - Historical Background
>> 3. - The Nature of the Einstein Hoax
>> 4. - Does the Aether Exist?
>> 5. - The Resurrection of Absolute Velocity by Quantum Experiments
>> 6. - The Nature of Reality
>> 7. - Applying the Lorentz Transformations Properly
>> 8. - Generating the Gravity Transformations
>> 9. - Dr. Einstein's Error and the Introduction of Curved Space
>> 10. - Gravitational Contraction and Collapse
>> 11. - Gravitational Collapse and the Creation of a Universe
>> 12. - The Space Time Continuum
>> 13. - The Nature of Particles
>> 14. - Adding Quantum Effects to Our Understanding
>> 15. - Changing the Paradigms
>> 16. - What Can We Conclude?

>> There are 57,000 words and 53 illustrations.

>> The source material for this posting may be found
>> inhttp://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm(1997);http://einsteinhoax.com/gravit...
>> (1987); andhttp://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm(1997). EVERYTHING WHICH >> WE
>> ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE >> ACCEPTED
>> AS
>> TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
>> MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
>> REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP
>> FROM
>> THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

>> All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at
>> thehttp://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

>> Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not >> monitored
>> on
>> a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same
>> courtesy
>> as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our
>> parts,
>> please do not raise objections that are not related to material that >> you
>> have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

>> E-mail:- einsteinho...@xxxxxxxxxxxx If you wish a reply, be sure
>> that
>> your mail reception is not blocked.

>> The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over >> 8
>> years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF >> THE
>> MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
>> individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
>> questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot >> be
>> objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
>> Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with >> one
>> exception for which a correction was provided.

> The Einstein relativity notion that fast moving items (such as the SST
> jet aircraft or that of a bullet train) experience a dimensional loss
> of their length or “length contraction”, as supposedly having nothing
> to do with applied thrust or friction of making whatever headway, and
> otherwise experience no apparent loss of whatever width or height
> seems a bit unlikely.

Nature does not always do what is likely

> According to Einstein, an extremely fast moving star (rogue or
> otherwise) would have to become more pancake/disk like, as its axial
> dimension remains constant while the forward/backwards radial
> dimension becomes measurably shorter in relationship to a given amount
> of velocity. However, at least thus far we have not detected this
> kind of skewed physics

There is no skewed physics. The whole point is that the laws of physics
apply the same everywhere.

We have detected the results of time dilation. of course.

> with extremely fast moving cosmic/stellar
> items.

> RX J0822-4300 at 1500 km/sec (0.5 c) and only 6500 ly distant means
> that by rights we should have noticed this kind of shape deformation
> due to those GENERAL RELATIVITY and SPECIAL RELATIVITY *THEORIES*. At
> least thus far and from our terrestrial and satellite limited
> perspectives, RX J0822-4300 still looks perfectly round/spherical.
>http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2007/puppis/puppis_epoch_2.jpg

> In this following image each star seems as equally round/spherical,
> even though one is supposedly moving at roughly 0.5 c away from the
> other.

It doesn't matter what speed they move relative to each other .. it matters
what speed they move relative to us. Also visual images are subject to
optical illusions that Sr can predict (such as Terrel rotation etc).

Like I said, the best science thus far doesn't depict those space/time
distortions outside of our solar system and local gravity.

No. We have no evidence of relativity effect s not happening outside

It’s exactly as though photons do not represent zero mass.

No .. its not

Like those gravity/gravitons, perhaps there is no real ultimate
velocity limits as to that of photons, at least once outside of
whatever limits are imposed via dark matter or whatever dark energy
represents.

There is currently no reasons to think that is the case.

The perceived source of photons may actually become known as the focus
point of matter attracting and thus receiving photons, instead of
transmitting them.

Perhaps black holes are just many positrons and their surrounding
photons at rest, or utter lack of photons because only positrons
coexist within its event horizon.

If matter creates light and other measurable photons, then what
exactly does antimatter create?

Clearly you don't understand physics, and your opinions on the matter are uninformed.


.

Loading